ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06420687Updated Mar 14, 2025

GaMA Metric to Quantify Functional Importance of Various Upper Limb Prosthetic Devices

An interventional study of Clinically prescribed prosthesis and Experimental prosthesis - Wrist rotation + 1-DOF in Amputation, Amputation, Traumatic and Amputation; Traumatic, Hand, sponsored by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-14.

Sponsored by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
  • Registered 4 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2020, registered May 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to utilize the Gaze and Movement Assessment (GaMA) metric to assess the effect of different prosthetic components on compensatory movements used to complete activities of daily living.

Read the detailed description

Evaluating the benefit of new prosthetic components and control mechanisms can be challenging, as most validated outcome measures assess the time required to complete various tasks without assessing the quality of the movement or the specific DOF(s) activated to accomplish the task. There are no adequate methods to evaluate the impact of new technology. The functional outcome measures recommended by The Academy of Prosthetics and Orthotics Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures (ULPOM) committee, which provided recommendations for measuring functional effectiveness of prosthetic treatment, mainly focus on the time to complete the task rather than assessing the compensatory movements.

The Gaze and Movement Assessment (GaMA) is a new validated and standardized metric to quantify the functional characteristics of prosthesis use by quantifying motion (three dimensional angular kinematics), gaze behavior and performance during simulated real-world tasks. There are two tasks, the Cup Transfer Task and the Pasta Box Task, used with the GAMA testing hardware. The tasks require movements representing day-to-day functional requirements, while challenging typical prosthetic limitations such as reaching and transporting objects at varying heights and across the body and lack of wrist motion. Each task can be subdivided into specific phases of reaching, grasping, transporting and releasing objects. A performance aspect encourages the participant to work efficiently, and tasks are short to allow multiple repetitions within a reasonable testing time frame to assess performance consistency. By breaking down each task into movements (i.e., of the pasta box from one shelf to the next), and each movement into specific phases (reach, grasp, transport, and release), the investigators can examine these components individually. It is hypothesized that additional degrees-of-freedom (for example wrist flexion) may require more time but will reduce the compensatory movements required to complete the tasks.

The primary endpoint of the study is to quantify the effect of various prosthetics components on kinematics.

The secondary endpoint is to obtain normative data for the GaMA system and system validation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amputation
  • Amputation, Traumatic
  • Amputation; Traumatic, Hand
  • Amputation; Traumatic, Limb

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Upper Limb Prosthetic Users
03

In context

Amputation, Traumatic

112 studies on the registry are indexed under Amputation, Traumatic; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is above the median of 15 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Amputation, Traumatic.

Browse Amputation, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab is the lead sponsor of 180 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (40%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A unilateral upper limb amputation or absence below the elbow
  • Ability to use a myoelectric prosthesis
  • English Speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant new injury that would prevent use of a prosthesis: The ability to consistently wear a prosthesis and perform activities of daily living and specific performance tasks is necessary to evaluate the relative benefits of the interventions.
  • Cognitive impairment sufficient to adversely affect understanding of or compliance with study requirements, ability to communicate experiences, or ability to give : The ability to understand and comply with requirements of the study is essential in order for the study to generate useable, reliable data.
  • Significant other comorbidity: Any other medical issues or injuries that would preclude completion of the study, use of the prostheses, or that would otherwise prevent acquisition of useable data by researchers
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Able-bodied participants

    Participants without amputation were enrolled to collect normative data for system validation. Adhesive motion capture markers will be placed on both arms (upper arm, forearm, hand and finger tips), thoracic spine and sacrum. The participant wears a specialized headband/glasses with an attached camera for eye tracking. The participant will pick up and move objects of different shapes to and from various heights.

  • Active comparator
    Transradial amputee participants

    Individuals using their home prosthesis when available. Adhesive motion capture markers will be placed on both arms (upper arm, forearm, hand and finger tips), thoracic spine and sacrum. The participant will wear a headband with attached markers for eye tracking. The participant will pick up and move objects of different shapes to and from various heights.

    Device: Clinically prescribed prosthesis

  • Experimental
    Transradial amputee participants - Wrist rotation+1 dof hand

    Individuals with transradial amputation fit with experimental prosthesis consisting of wrist rotation and one degree of freedom hand. Adhesive motion capture markers will be placed on both arms (upper arm, forearm, hand and finger tips), thoracic spine and sacrum. The participant will wear a headband with attached markers for eye tracking. The participant will pick up and move objects of different shapes to and from various heights.

    Device: Experimental prosthesis - Wrist rotation + 1-DOF

  • Experimental
    Transradial amputee participants - Wrist rotation + wrist flexion +1 dof hand

    Individuals with transradial amputation fit with experimental prosthesis consisting of wrist rotation, wrist flexion and one degree of freedom hand. Adhesive motion capture markers will be placed on both arms (upper arm, forearm, hand and finger tips), thoracic spine and sacrum. The participant will wear a headband with attached markers for eye tracking. The participant will pick up and move objects of different shapes to and from various heights.

    Device: Experimental prosthesis - Wrist rotation + Wrist flexion +1-DOF

  • Experimental
    Transradial amputee participants - Wrist rotation + multi degree freedom hand

    Individuals with transradial amputation fit with experimental prosthesis consisting of wrist rotation and multi degree freedom hand. Adhesive motion capture markers will be placed on both arms (upper arm, forearm, hand and finger tips), thoracic spine and sacrum. The participant will wear a headband with attached markers for eye tracking. The participant will pick up and move objects of different shapes to and from various heights.

    Device: Experimental prosthesis - Wrist rotation + Multi DOF hand

  • Experimental
    Transradial amputee participants - Wrist rotation + wrist flexion + multi degree freedom hand

    Individuals with transradial amputation fit with experimental prosthesis consisting of wrist rotation, wrist flexion and multi degree freedom hand. Adhesive motion capture markers will be placed on both arms (upper arm, forearm, hand and finger tips), thoracic spine and sacrum. The participant will wear a headband with attached markers for eye tracking. The participant will pick up and move objects of different shapes to and from various heights.

    Device: Experimental prosthesis - Wrist rotation + wrist flexion + Multi DOF hand

Interventions

  • DeviceClinically prescribed prosthesis

    Clinically prescribed prosthesis:

  • DeviceExperimental prosthesis - Wrist rotation + 1-DOF

    1-DOF wrist rotation and1-DOF hand

  • DeviceExperimental prosthesis - Wrist rotation + Wrist flexion +1-DOF

    2-DOF wrist (rotation and flexion) and 1-DOF hand

  • DeviceExperimental prosthesis - Wrist rotation + Multi DOF hand

    1-DOF wrist rotation and multi-DOF hand

  • DeviceExperimental prosthesis - Wrist rotation + wrist flexion + Multi DOF hand

    2-DOF wrist (rotation and flexion) and multi-DOF hand

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Kinematics data while performing the Pasta Box Task

    Utilizes motion capture hardware during prosthesis use and collects three dimensional angular kinematics, gaze behavior and performance during simulated tasks. Participants move a pasta box from the target on a side cart at the right side of the body onto a mid-height shelf target in front of them. Then they move the box from the mid-height shelf target to the high shelf target on the opposite side. Finally, they pick up the pasta box from the high shelf target and return it to the initial position. Each task can be subdivided into specific phases of reaching, grasping, transporting and releasing objects. By breaking down each task into movements, and each movement into specific phases (reach, grasp, transport, and release), the investigators can examine these components individually.

    Time frame: After 6-week home trial

  2. Kinematics data while performing the Cup Transfer Task

    Utilizes motion capture hardware during prosthesis use and collects three dimensional angular kinematics, gaze behavior and performance during simulated tasks. The Cup transfer task consists of moving two cups filled with beads (simulating being filled with liquid) over a partition and back again for a total of four object movements. The cups are deformable and will spill beads if grabbed too hard. Like in the Pasta task, participants start each trial with their hand in the home position and their eyes fixated on a centered motion capture marker. Each task can be subdivided into specific phases of reaching, grasping, transporting and releasing objects. By breaking down each task into movements, and each movement into specific phases (reach, grasp, transport, and release), the investigators can examine these components individually.

    Time frame: After 6-week home trial

Secondary outcomes

  1. Eye gaze data while performing the Pasta Box Task

    Eye tracking hardware during prosthesis use the GAMA collects three dimensional gaze behavior and performance during simulated tasks.

    Time frame: After 6 week home trial

  2. Eye gaze data while performing the Cup Transfer Task

    Eye tracking hardware during prosthesis use the GAMA collects three dimensional gaze behavior and performance during simulated tasks.

    Time frame: After 6 week home trial

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06420687
Responsible party
Laura Miller (Team Scientist III, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 20, 2024
Start date
Apr 20, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 14, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion