CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06420037Updated Nov 18, 2025

The Influence of the Individual Auditory-cognitive Need on the Aided Benefit Using Different Feature Settings

An interventional study of Hearing aid feature adjustment (frequency compression) of the following hearing aids: Phonak Audéo Paradise/Lumity 70 and Hearing aid feature adjustment (noise reduction) of the following hearing aids: Phonak Audéo Paradise/Lumity 70 in Speech Intelligibility and Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, sponsored by University Ghent. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-18.

Sponsored by University Ghent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2023, registered Apr 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
45 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to optimize hearing aid benefit based on the individual auditory-cognitive need using different hearing aid features in first-time hearing aid users between 45-80 years old with bilateral Phonak Audéo Paradise/Lumity 70/90 hearing aids. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does cognitive functioning affect hearing aid benefit? How can hearing aid fitting be optimized based on the individual auditory-cognitive profile?

The hypothesis posits that cognitive abilities influence the effectiveness of hearing aids, alongside hearing status. Furthermore, if features of hearing aids improve speech understanding and listening effort, it is proposed that individuals with lower cognitive functioning will experience heightened benefits from hearing aids.

The study will consist of three groups: one control group and two groups where one different feature will be modified.

Participants will be tested at baseline measurement, including:

  • screening tests
  • audiological tests
  • questionnaires
  • cognitive tests
  • real-ear-measurement

Following this, participants will be divided in one of the three groups, after which speech audiometry will be repeated. After a 4-week acclimatization period, the second measurement will take place, repeating speech audiometry and questionnaires. Subsequently, the hearing aid settings will be restored to their initial configuration.

02

Conditions studied

  • Speech Intelligibility
  • Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
03

In context

Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

371 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; 111 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is close to the median of 32 across 264 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss, Sensorineural.

Browse Hearing Loss, Sensorineural studies →

Lead sponsor

University Ghent is the lead sponsor of 345 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Dutch-speaking individuals aged between 45-80 years old
  • individuals with normal vision (with glasses or lenses if needed)
  • individuals with age-related hearing loss
  • individuals with bilateral hearing aids (Phonak Audéo Paradise/Lumity 70)
  • individuals who are capable to give consent to participate in the study themselves

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • user of cochlear implants
  • use of influencing medication (for example: Rilatin and antidepressants)
  • learning disabilities (for example: dyslexia and dyscalculia)
  • (history of) neurological problems (brain tumor, epilepsy, history of stroke, ...)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Individuals between 45-80 years with bilateral hearing aids (control group)

    Within this control group, no changes will be made to the hearing aid settings. However, they undergo all other tests of the test protocol.

    Behavioral: Cognitive screening and vision screening · Behavioral: Audiological Assessment · Behavioral: Questionnaires · Behavioral: Cognition · Other: Real ear measurement

  • Experimental
    Individuals between 45-80 years with bilateral hearing aids (frequency compression)

    Within this experimental group, a slight modification (which differs between groups) will be made to the basic hearing aid setting.

    Device: Hearing aid feature adjustment (frequency compression) of the following hearing aids: Phonak Audéo Paradise/Lumity 70 · Behavioral: Cognitive screening and vision screening · Behavioral: Audiological Assessment · Behavioral: Questionnaires · Behavioral: Cognition · Other: Real ear measurement

  • Experimental
    Individuals between 45-80 years with bilateral hearing aids (noise reduction)

    Within this experimental group, a slight modification (which differs between groups) will be made to the basic hearing aid setting.

    Device: Hearing aid feature adjustment (noise reduction) of the following hearing aids: Phonak Audéo Paradise/Lumity 70 · Behavioral: Cognitive screening and vision screening · Behavioral: Audiological Assessment · Behavioral: Questionnaires · Behavioral: Cognition · Other: Real ear measurement

Interventions

  • DeviceHearing aid feature adjustment (frequency compression) of the following hearing aids: Phonak Audéo Paradise/Lumity 70

    Upon enrollment, each participant will be allocated to one of three research groups and participants will remain unaware of their group assignment. This groups will undergo a slight modification, namely frequency compression turned off, to the basic setting.

  • DeviceHearing aid feature adjustment (noise reduction) of the following hearing aids: Phonak Audéo Paradise/Lumity 70

    Upon enrollment, each participant will be allocated to one of three research groups and participants will remain unaware of their group assignment. This groups will undergo a slight modification, namely noise reduction turned off, to the basic setting.

  • BehavioralCognitive screening and vision screening

    The Dutch Montreal Cognitive Assessment will be assessed. The Snellen Eye Test will be used to screen for normal or corrected-to-normal vision.

  • BehavioralAudiological Assessment

    Three audiological tests are included: 1) Tympanometry to assess the middle ear status, 2) Pure-tone audiometry with headphone to evaluate the hearing thresholds, 3) Speech audiometry in free field to assess the ability to understand spoken sentences in quiet and in the presence of background noise.

  • BehavioralQuestionnaires

    Three questionnaires are included: 1. The HAVICOP questionnaire to assess the hearing-related quality of life (Ceuleers, D., Baudonck, N., Keppler, H., Kestens, K., Dhooge, I., \& Degeest, S. (2023). Development of the hearing-related quality of life questionnaire for auditory-visual, cognitive and psychosocial functioning (hAVICOP). Journal of communication disorders, 101, 106291.) 2. the FAS (fatigue assessment scale) to assess how you usually feel 3. the EEAS (extended effort assessment scale) to assess how you experience listening in everyday life.

  • BehavioralCognition

    Four cognitive functions, important for speech understanding, will be assessed both audibly and visually: divided attention, working memory, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility and inhibition.

  • OtherReal ear measurement

    This test will give an objective assessment of the hearing aids' configuration.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Speech reception threshold

    Based on the results of the speech understanding task, the speech reception threshold will give an indication of the ability to understand spoken sentences in quiet and noise.

    Time frame: This outcome measure will be assessed twice during the initial measurement (both +/- 10 minutes) and once during the second measurement (+/- 10 minutes).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hearing related quality of life

    Thirty-five sentences should be responded using a VAS (0-100). Mean scores will be calculated for each subdomain separately (auditory-visual, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning) as well as combined within a total score; the worse one's hearing-related quality of life, the lower the score.

    Time frame: This outcome parameter will be assessed twice: once during the initial measurement and once during the subsequent measurement (both +/- 10 minutes).

  2. Fatigue assessment

    Ten sentences should be responded based on five categories, ranging from Never to Always: 1 = Never; 2 = Sometimes; 3 = Frequently; 4 = Often; and 5 = Always.

    Time frame: This outcome parameter will be assessed twice: once during the initial measurement and once during the subsequent measurement (both +/- 5 minutes).

  3. Effort assessment

    Ten sentences should be responded using a VAS (0-100). Mean scores will be calculated for each sentence. The lower the score, the lower the effort.

    Time frame: This outcome parameter will be assessed twice: once during the initial measurement and once during the subsequent measurement (both +/- 5 minutes).

  4. Cognitive functioning (auditory and visual)

    Cognitive functions such as 'divided attention', 'working memory', 'processing speed', and 'flexibility and inhibition' will be assessed both audibly and visually. Mean scores and average reaction times will be computed.

    Time frame: These outcome measures will be assessed once during the first measurement (+/- 55 minutes).

  5. Real ear measurement

    Test to obtain an objective understanding of the current settings of the hearing aids.

    Time frame: This outcome measure will be assessed once during the first measurement (+/- 15-20 minutes).

  6. Screening of mild cognitive impairment (MoCA) and vision

    The result (max 30) on the MoCA will be calculated.

    Time frame: This outcome measure will be assessed once during the first measurement (+/- 5-10 minutes).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Ghent
    Ghent, East-Flanders 9000, Belgium
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06420037
Lead sponsor
University Ghent
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 17, 2024
Start date
Nov 1, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 4, 2024
Completion
Oct 4, 2024
Last update
Nov 18, 2025

Study contacts

Hannah Keppler, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · University Ghent

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion