CClinicalTrials.gg
Sign In
RecruitingNCT06417788Updated May 22, 2024

Dynamic Guided Implant Surgery VS Static Guided Surgery.

An interventional study of Dental implant placement and Static guided implant placement in Partially Edentulous Patients, Bone Crest of at Least 10 mm Length and 6 mm Width and Patients of at Least 18 Years Old, sponsored by Universitat Internacional de Catalunya. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-22.

Sponsored by Universitat Internacional de Catalunya · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate if dynamic-guided surgery is an accurate system for placing dental implants.

Researchers will assess the dental implant accuracy of the dynamic guided system compared to the static pilot guide.

Participants will:

  • Receive implant treatment that will be placed by a dynamic or static pilot drill guided system.
  • Receive post-operative radiological exam for comparative (on the same appointment).
02

Conditions studied

  • Partially Edentulous Patients
  • Bone Crest of at Least 10 mm Length and 6 mm Width
  • Patients of at Least 18 Years Old

Browse trials for

03

In context

Mouth, Edentulous

244 studies on the registry are indexed under Mouth, Edentulous; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 30 across 187 interventional studies indexed under Mouth, Edentulous.

Browse Mouth, Edentulous studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya is the lead sponsor of 144 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older,
  • ASA type 1 or 2,
  • Full mouth plaque scores up to 25% (O'LEARY TJ. The plaque control record 1972;43:38), -Partially edentulous with at least one missing tooth
  • Having a bone crest of at least 10mm in length and 6mm in width.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medical conditions contraindicating surgery,
  • untreated periodontal disease or caries
  • the need for bone augmentation
  • acute local infections
  • history of head/neck radiation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Test group or Dynamic guided group

    in this arm, the position and angulation of the implant in the patient's mouth will be guided by a dynamic guided system.

    Device: Dental implant placement

  • Active comparator
    Control group or Static guided group

    In this arm, the position and angulation of the implant in the patient's mouth will be guided by a stereolitographic pilot drill guide.

    Procedure: Static guided implant placement

Interventions

  • DeviceDental implant placement

    Dental implant placement guided by Navident® (ClaroNav Inc., Toronto, Canada)

    Also known as: dynamic guided implant placement

  • ProcedureStatic guided implant placement

    Dental implant placement guided by a stereolithographic pilot drill guide.

    Also known as: control group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Implant placement accuracy at the implant platform level

    Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm.

    Time frame: The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes.

  2. Implant placement accuracy at the implant apex level

    Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm.

    Time frame: The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes.

  3. Implant placement accuracy at an angular evel

    Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in degrees.

    Time frame: The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes.

  4. Implant placement accuracy at the vertical plane.

    Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm.

    Time frame: The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
    Sant Cugat Del Vallès, Barcelona 08195, Spain
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Somogyi-Ganss E, Holmes HI, Jokstad A. Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Aug;26(8):882-890. doi: 10.1111/clr.12414. Epub 2014 May 19. PubMed 24837492 ↗
  • Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:112-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x. PubMed 23062136 ↗
  • Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:124-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02545.x. PubMed 23062137 ↗
  • Block MS, Emery RW, Lank K, Ryan J. Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):92-99. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5004. Epub 2016 Sep 19. PubMed 27643585 ↗
  • D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):121-133. doi: 10.1111/prd.12175. PubMed 28000275 ↗
  • Sun TM, Lan TH, Pan CY, Lee HE. Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Jan;34(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Dec 8. PubMed 29310817 ↗
  • Block MS, Emery RW. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;74(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 30. PubMed 26452429 ↗
  • O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38. No abstract available. PubMed 4500182 ↗
  • Hendrix JM, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. 2025 Feb 11. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441940/ PubMed 28722969 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Plan to publish the IPD.

Supporting information: Sap, Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06417788
Lead sponsor
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Responsible party
Jordi Marquès Guasch (Jordi marques Guasch, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 16, 2024
Start date
May 30, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
May 22, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Other studies in this condition

Mouth, Edentulous→

Other studies from this sponsor

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Start the discussion