ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06414603ACES-EMBUpdated Feb 27, 2026

A Comparative Effectiveness Study in Heart Transplant Patients of Rejection Surveillance With Cell-free DNA Versus Endomyocardial Biopsy

An interventional study of The Prospera™ Test in Heart Transplant Failure and Rejection, sponsored by Natera, Inc.. Active, not recruiting at 16 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Sponsored by Natera, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an open label Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) study in which patients will be randomized at the site level to Prospera surveillance or EMB surveillance in a 2:1 ratio (Prospera to EMB) at each site.

Subjects will be enrolled into the study while under evaluation for heart transplantation or on the transplant waiting list prior to heart transplantation. All subjects will follow the center's standard of care surveillance schedule from transplant through 4 weeks post-transplantation. EMB during this phase is expected to occur roughly weekly or bi-weekly.

Study group assignment will take place at randomization. Subjects will be randomized 30 days (± 10 days) post-transplant to Prospera surveillance versus EMB surveillance in a 2:1 ratio. Rejection surveillance (Prospera Group and EMB Group) will be performed at times corresponding to the institutional standard of care schedule for rejection surveillance.

Read the detailed description

All subjects will undergo standard of care assessments for rejection monitoring in addition to Prospera testing and/or EMB in accordance with each site's clinical care protocols and at the discretion of the treating clinician. Quality of life questionnaires will be completed at week 4, month 6 and month 12 post-transplant.

Study Group: Prospera (dd-cfDNA) Surveillance Group Subjects are required to undergo Prospera testing at times corresponding to the institution's graft surveillance schedule. Prospera test results will be provided to the clinical team. Prospera cfDNA level \< 0.15% will be interpreted as low risk for acute rejection (AR). Prospera cfDNA ≥ 0.15% will be interpreted as increased risk for AR and may be followed by EMB to rule out AR at the discretion of the treating clinicians. All other standard of care modalities for assessing AR can be used at the discretion of the treating clinicians at any time throughout the study. As per standard of care, in subjects with clinical signs or symptoms of rejection, a for cause EMB can be done per the clinical team's discretion at any time during the study.

Control Group: EMB Surveillance Group Subjects will undergo surveillance EMB per the institution's standard clinical care. Biopsy interpretation will be per the institutional pathologist using international guidelines for grading of acute cellular or antibody-mediated rejection. Subjects will also have Prospera testing performed at the time of surveillance EMB for the purpose of measuring concordance between dd-cfDNA surveillance testing and surveillance EMB; Prospera results will not be returned to investigators for subjects in the EMB surveillance group.

Subjects in both the Prospera and EMB Surveillance Groups will have Prospera blood draws performed at the time of any for cause EMB. Results of Prospera testing performed in conjunction with for cause EMB will not be returned to investigators or subjects.

Blood samples for exploratory mechanistic endpoints (miRNA) will be obtained at the time of each Prospera or EMB surveillance visit and at the time of any for cause EMB.

The study period will be during the first 12 months post-transplant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Transplant Failure and Rejection

Keywords

  • Heart Transplant
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Natera, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18 years or older at the time of signing .
  2. Undergoing transplant evaluation or currently on the heart transplant waiting list and expected to receive a heart transplant.
  3. Able to read, understand and provide written informed consent. If the patient is unable to sign informed consent, a legally authorized representative (LAR) can consent on behalf of the patient.
  4. Able and willing to comply with the study visit schedule, study procedures and study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Concurrent multiple solid organ or tissue transplants.
  2. Prior history of any organ or cellular transplantation.
  3. Planned use of other commercially available or cfDNA or gene expression profile assays for rejection surveillance.
  4. Pregnant.
  5. Hemodynamically unstable or other serious medical condition that may adversely affect the subject's ability to participate in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prospera Surveillance Cohort

    Subjects are required to undergo Prospera testing at times corresponding to the institution's graft surveillance schedule. Prospera test results will be provided to the clinical team. Prospera cfDNA level \< 0.15% will be interpreted as low risk for acute rejection (AR). Prospera cfDNA ≥ 0.15% will be interpreted as increased risk for AR and may be followed by EMB to rule out AR at the discretion of the treating clinicians. All other standard of care modalities for assessing AR can be used at the discretion of the treating clinicians at any time throughout the study. As per standard of care, in subjects with clinical signs or symptoms of rejection, a for cause EMB can be done per the clinical team's discretion at any time during the study.

    Diagnostic Test: The Prospera™ Test

  • No intervention
    Endomyocardial Biopsy Surveillance Cohort

    Subjects will undergo surveillance EMB per the institution's standard clinical care. Biopsy interpretation will be per the institutional pathologist using international guidelines for grading of acute cellular or antibody-mediated rejection. Subjects will also have Prospera testing performed at the time of surveillance EMB for the purpose of measuring concordance between dd-cfDNA surveillance testing and surveillance EMB; Prospera results will not be returned to investigators for subjects in the EMB surveillance group.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testThe Prospera™ Test

    The Prospera™ test is a non-invasive test intended to detect and quantify the fraction of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) to supplement management and surveillance of allograft rejection in patients who have undergone organ transplantation. It employs Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), which is performed on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) that is extracted from the patient's plasma to discriminate between the patient's DNA and the solid organ-allograft DNA. In study 23-069-TRP, the Prospera test is indicated for heart allograft rejection surveillance in lieu of surveillance endomyocardial biopsy. Prospera results should be considered together with clinical evaluations and other diagnostic testing or imaging results. Prospera will be run as a centralized laboratory developed test that is developed and validated under Design Controls. The test will be run within Natera's CLIA-certified and CAP-accredited laboratory.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Clinical Endpoint

    Incidence of the composite endpoint defined as the first occurrence of treated rejection with graft dysfunction\*, treated rejection without graft dysfunction, graft dysfunction, retransplantation, and/or death. Clinical endpoints are defined as follows: 1. Rejection: ISHLT ACR Grade ≥ 2R or AMR Grade ≥ pAMR1 2. Graft dysfunction: LVEF decline ≥ 10% from baseline and \< 50% absolute LVEF by echocardiography 3. Retransplantation: being listed for re-transplant or being re-transplanted * Treated rejection with graft dysfunction and/or graft dysfunction requiring treatment with pulse dose steroids, monoclonal antibodies, plasmapheresis, and/or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg).

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

16 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kim H, Cusi V, McLenon M, Rodriguez JBC, Bui QM, Chak J, Urey MA, Cole J, Fielding-Miller R, Kim PJ. Perspectives of Heart Transplant Patients and Providers on Acute Rejection Surveillance: A Mixed-Methods Study. Clin Transplant. 2026 Jan;40(1):e70438. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70438. PubMed 41492943 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 32 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 2, 2024
First posted
May 16, 2024
StartActual
Jun 10, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 2027
Last update
Feb 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06414603
Lead sponsor
Natera, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 16, 2024
Start date
Jun 10, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Study contacts

Michael Olymbios, MD
study director · Natera, Inc.
Josef Stehlik, MD
study chair · University of Utah
Palak Shah, MD
study chair · Inova Schar Heart and Vascular

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion