ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07339384SIGNAL-EMC 101Updated Jun 17, 2026

Signatera Assessment in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer

An interventional study of Signatera Genome ultra-sensitive ctDNA blood test in Endometrial Cancer, sponsored by Natera, Inc.. Not yet recruiting at 12 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-17.

Sponsored by Natera, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,010
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess if circulating tumor DNA can guide adjuvant selection in high-intermediate risk early-stage endometrial cancer. The main question it aims to answer is:

  • To evaluate if 3-year recurrence-free survival among women with Stage I, high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer who are ctDNA negative after receiving ctDNA-guided observation is non-inferior to adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (an internal radiation therapy) Researchers will compare high-risk intermediate ctDNA negative participants who are observed to those who receive vaginal brachytherapy to see if they have similar outcomes.

Participants will be asked to:

  • Receive serial ctDNA testing
  • Visit their study doctor per their standard of care visits about every 3 months for 2 years
  • Answer a questionnaire about their well-being
Read the detailed description

This includes a randomized, multi-center, non-inferiority trial for a biomarker-defined subgroup, alongside two parallel, non-randomized exploratory cohorts. The study utilizes a biomarker-stratified design to formally test a treatment de-escalation strategy in patients with HIR endometrial cancer.

Following surgery, patients in the HIR cohort will be stratified based on post-operative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status, as determined by the Signatera Genome assay. ctDNA-negative HIR Patients, based on the first valid post-operative ctDNA result within the baseline window, will be randomized (1:1) to either:

  • Arm A: Observation unless ctDNA positivity within baseline window (\<12 weeks), with serial ctDNA monitoring.
  • Arm B: Vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) with serial ctDNA monitoring.

Following the initial baseline test, providers will be blinded to subsequent ctDNA results unless ctDNA positive within the first 12 weeks in Arm A [in which case, the provider will be notified and treatment of physician's choice (TPC) will be initiated. Initiation of TPC following ctDNA conversion is considered part of the ctDNA-guided treatment strategy, not a protocol deviation or cross-over, and such patients remain in the intent-to-treat population in Arm A]. Providers treating patients in Arm B will remain blinded to all ctDNA results after randomization. Post-operative ctDNA-Positive HIR patients will not be randomized and will continue serial testing while receiving TPC, which may include observation, radiation and/or chemotherapy. Providers and patients will be unblinded to the initial ctDNA result and blinded to ctDNA results thereafter.

The study will also include early stage low-risk (LR) and high-risk (HR) cohorts. Patients in these cohorts will not be randomized. They will continue serial ctDNA testing while receiving TPC, which may include observation, radiation and/or chemotherapy, and during surveillance. Providers and patients will be blinded to ctDNA results during the post-operative, TPC and surveillance period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

  • ctDNA
  • Endometrial Cancer
  • circulating tumor
  • Signatera
  • Molecular Residual Disease
  • MRD
  • biomarker-guided therapy
  • Vaginal Brachytherapy
  • VBT
  • High-Intermediate Risk Endometrial Cancer
  • Adjuvant Therapy
  • Tumor-informed assay
03

In context

Endometrial Neoplasms

1,425 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms; 473 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,010 is above the median of 71 across 1,026 interventional studies indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms.

Browse Endometrial Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Natera, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

General inclusion criteria includes the following selection criteria to be eligible for inclusion in any aspect of the study. Eligibility will be assessed by the investigator:

1. Signed and dated form (ICF) obtained prior to any trial-specific enrollment procedure.

2. Patient is ≥ 18 years-old at the time of ICF signature. 3. Able to submit sufficient residual tissue obtained per standard of care procedures.

HIR patients must meet all the following selection criteria to be eligible for the randomization cohort in the study. Eligibility will be assessed by the investigator:

  1. FIGO 2009 Stage I after hysterectomy and lymph node assessment by bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy or SLND

    1. If para-aortic lymph nodes are not pathologically assessed, documentation of surgical assessment or imaging is recommended.
  2. Stage I patients with endometrioid histology:

    1. Age 70 years or older with one uterine risk factor,
    2. Age 50-69 years with two risk factors,
    3. Age 18 - 49 years with three risk factors.

Uterine risk factors include:

  • Grade 2 or 3 tumor.
  • Outer half depth of invasion.
  • Lymphovascular invasion. Note: peritoneal cytology must be negative if performed.

Patients must meet all the following selection criteria to be eligible for the observation arms of the study. Eligibility will be assessed by the investigator following hysterectomy and lymph node assessment by bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy or SLND:

1. High risk cohort

a. FIGO 2009 Stage I with high risk histology i. Defined as serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, or mixed histology.

  1. Negative peritoneal cytology, where performed (recommended)
  2. If para-aortic lymph nodes are not pathologically assessed, imaging is required b. FIGO 2009 Stage II Endometrioid

2. Low risk cohort

a. FIGO 2009 Stage I patients at low risk of recurrence i. Endometriod histology ii. Absent uterine risk factors, or present but insufficient to meet HIR criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients are not eligible for the study if they meet any of the following criteria, as assessed by the investigator:

  1. Undifferentiated or dedifferentiated histology
  2. Uterine sarcoma
  3. Prior pelvic radiation therapy
  4. Positive pelvic washings
  5. Pelvic lymph node assessment was not performed
  6. Isolated Tumor Cells (ITC) identified in the lymph node(s)
  7. Prior therapy for endometrial cancer (including hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy)

    a. or other hormonal management for endometrial intraepithelial hyperplasia is allowed

  8. Patients with a history of other invasive , with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer, are excluded if there is any evidence of active malignancy within the last five years.

    a. Patients are also excluded if their previous cancer treatment contraindicates this protocol therapy.

  9. Patients with a history of serious comorbid illness or uncontrolled illnesses that would preclude protocol therapy.
  10. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or uncontrolled arrhythmia within 3 months from enrollment.
  11. Previous diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis.
  12. Patient is currently receiving, or plans to receive, commercial ctDNA/MRD assay for disease monitoring, excluding Signatera. Patients must agree to forego testing with assays other than Signatera Genome upon enrollment until end of study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
1,010 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Observation

    Participants will be monitored by their study physician and will not receive treatment

    Device: Signatera Genome ultra-sensitive ctDNA blood test

  • Active comparator
    Vaginal Brachytherapy (VBT)

    Participants will receive standard-of-care vaginal brachytherapy

    Device: Signatera Genome ultra-sensitive ctDNA blood test

Interventions

  • DeviceSignatera Genome ultra-sensitive ctDNA blood test

    Signatera Genome is intended for use as a post-surgical risk stratification tool for patients with early-stage HIR endometrial cancer. The test is used to identify patients with no evidence of MRD following definitive surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence Free Survival (RFS)

    The primary objective of this study is to evaluate if recurrence free survival (RFS) is non-inferior among women with stage I high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer who are ctDNA-negative after surgery and managed with ctDNA-guided observation versus adjuvant VBT.

    Time frame: 3 years from randomization to the first occurrence of disease recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurs first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survial

    Comparison of overall survival (OS) among all high-intermediate risk (HIR) patients and recurrence free survival (RFS) across treatment groups and assess whether ctDNA-guided de-escalation group is non-inferior to adjuvant VBT.

    Time frame: From enrollment to Year 3 and enrollment to Year 5

  2. ctDNA Clearance Rate

    Estimate the ctDNA clearance rate among high-intermediate risk ctDNA positive participants.

    Time frame: From enrollment until first surveillance visit at 12 weeks

  3. Clinicopathologic and Molecular Risk Factors

    Assess the primary and secondary objectives by clinicopathologic and molecular (e.g. POLE, MMR-D, p53 aberrant, p53 wild type) risk factors, and ethnic/racial groups among high-intermediate risk patients.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years from enrollment

Other outcomes

  1. Lead time of ctDNA positivity

    Examine differences in lead time of ctDNA positivity relative to clinical or radiologic diagnosis of recurrence across different ctDNA dynamic groups (e.g. clearance, persistent negative) among LR, HIR, and HR patients.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years from enrollment

  2. Disease-specific recurrence

    Determine disease-specific recurrence among high-intermediate risk patients.

    Time frame: At 3 years and 5 years.

  3. ctDNA positivity rate

    Assess ctDNA positivity rate, defined as proportion of patients, among all HIR, HR, and LR patients with evaluable ctDNA results

    Time frame: From randomization to 3 years and 5 years

  4. ctDNA negativity rate

    ctDNA negativity rate, defined as proportion of patients with a negative ctDNA, among all HIR, HR, and LR patients with evaluable ctDNA results.

    Time frame: From randomization to 3 years and 5 years

  5. ctDNA clearance rate

    Assess the ctDNA clearance rate of ctDNA from HIR, HR, and LR participants.

    Time frame: From enrollment up to 5 years

  6. ctDNA negative persistence rate

    Assess proportion of HIR, HR, and LR participants who remain ctDNA-negative throughout the surveillance period among participants who were ctDNA-negative post-operatively or post-adjuvant treatment.

    Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment and up to 5 years.

  7. Mean Tumor Molecules (MTM)

    Assess mean tumor molecules (MTM) presence change over time in HIR, HR, and LR participants.

    Time frame: From enrollment to up to 5 years

  8. Variant Allele Frequencies (VAF)

    Assess variant allele frequencies (VAF) changes over time in HIR, HR, and LR participants.

    Time frame: From enrollment up to 5 years

  9. Cost-effectiveness of ctDNA guided care

    Compare the ctDNA cost for High-Risk Intermediate endometrial cancer participants who were randomized to the observation cohort to those that received standard of care (VBT) treatment

    Time frame: Up to 5 years from enrollment

  10. Quality of Life Outcomes

    Compare Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes between the Observation and Vaginal Brachytherapy (VBT) treatment arms among HIR patients, utilizing the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptoms Version 4 (FACT-ES) patient-reported outcome (PRO).

    Time frame: Up to 5 years from enrollment

07

Study locations

12 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27-38
  • Mahdi H, Elshaikh MA, DeBenardo R, Munkarah A, Isrow D, Singh S, Waggoner S, Ali-Fehmi R, Morris RT, Harding J, Moslemi-Kebria M. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and pelvic radiation on pattern of recurrence and outcome in stage I non-invasive uterine papillary serous carcinoma. A multi-institution study. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 May;137(2):239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.544. Epub 2015 Jan 29. PubMed 25641568 ↗
  • Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, van den Bergh AC, de Winter KA, Koper PC, Lybeert ML, Slot A, Lutgens LC, Stenfert Kroese MC, Beerman H, van Lent M; postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma Trial. Outcome of high-risk stage IC, grade 3, compared with stage I endometrial carcinoma patients: the Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Apr 1;22(7):1234-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.159. PubMed 15051771 ↗
  • Hamilton CA, Cheung MK, Osann K, Chen L, Teng NN, Longacre TA, Powell MA, Hendrickson MR, Kapp DS, Chan JK. Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers. Br J Cancer. 2006 Mar 13;94(5):642-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603012. PubMed 16495918 ↗
  • Siegenthaler F, Lindemann K, Epstein E, Rau TT, Nastic D, Ghaderi M, Rydberg F, Mueller MD, Carlson J, Imboden S. Time to first recurrence, pattern of recurrence, and survival after recurrence in endometrial cancer according to the molecular classification. Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;165(2):230-238. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.024. Epub 2022 Mar 8. PubMed 35277281 ↗
  • Feng W, Jia N, Jiao H, Chen J, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhu M, Zhu C, Shen L, Long W. Circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic marker in high-risk endometrial cancer. J Transl Med. 2021 Feb 3;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02722-8. PubMed 33536036 ↗
  • Makker V, MacKay H, Ray-Coquard I, Levine DA, Westin SN, Aoki D, Oaknin A. Endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Dec 9;7(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00324-8. PubMed 34887451 ↗
  • Kalampokas E, Giannis G, Kalampokas T, Papathanasiou AA, Mitsopoulou D, Tsironi E, Triantafyllidou O, Gurumurthy M, Parkin DE, Cairns M, Vlahos NF. Current Approaches to the Management of Patients with Endometrial Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 16;14(18):4500. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184500. PubMed 36139659 ↗
  • Clarke MA, Devesa SS, Harvey SV, Wentzensen N. Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Incidence Trends and Differences in Relative Survival Reveal Racial Disparities and Rising Rates of Nonendometrioid Cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1895-1908. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00151. Epub 2019 May 22. PubMed 31116674 ↗
  • Giaquinto AN, Broaddus RR, Jemal A, Siegel RL. The Changing Landscape of Gynecologic Cancer Mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar 1;139(3):440-442. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004676. PubMed 35115431 ↗
  • https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2018/
  • Sohaib SA, Houghton SL, Meroni R, Rockall AG, Blake P, Reznek RH. Recurrent endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrent disease and assessment of prognosis. Clin Radiol. 2007 Jan;62(1):28-34; discussion 35-6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.06.015. PubMed 17145260 ↗
  • Howlader N, N.A., Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds), SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2017. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD
  • Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Jan-Feb;75(1):10-45. doi: 10.3322/caac.21871. Epub 2025 Jan 16. PubMed 39817679 ↗
  • van den Heerik ASVM, Horeweg N, Creutzberg CL, Nout RA. Vaginal brachytherapy management of stage I and II endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Mar;32(3):304-310. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002493. PubMed 35256416 ↗
  • Kako TD, Kamal MZ, Dholakia J, Scalise CB, Arend RC. High-intermediate risk endometrial cancer: moving toward a molecularly based risk assessment profile. Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;27(2):323-331. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02089-2. Epub 2022 Jan 17. PubMed 35038071 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07339384
Lead sponsor
Natera, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 14, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2034 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 17, 2026

Study contacts

Brooke Cormane, MBS
Contact
bcormane@natera.com
844-778-4700
Adam ElNaggar, MD
study director · Natera, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion