CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06406959ERA-TAPPUpdated May 9, 2024

The Effect of Preemptive Regional Anesthesia (TAP-block) on Acute and Chronic Pain After Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP)

An interventional study of Transversus abdominal plane block (TAP block) in Primary Inguinal Hernia, sponsored by Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-09.

Sponsored by Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is devoted to the impact of preemptive regional Transversus abdominal plane block on the postoperative acute and chronic pain after elective Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.

Read the detailed description

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common elective interventions in general surgery. Approximately 20 million inguinal hernia repairs are performed worldwide every year. Laparo-endoscopic techniques provide faster recovery times, lower chronic pain risk and are cost effective compared to open one.

Nevertheless, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can result in moderate to severe pain in the early postoperative period, interfering the time of returning to normal activity in a substantial quantity of patients. To reduce pain and to accelerate recovery, local and regional anesthetics has been successfully implemented into the daily routine of abdominal surgeries.

Recent systematic reviews have shown that TAP block can reduce analgetic consumption and acute pain scores after inguinal hernia repair. However, most included studies were conducted on patients with open hernia surgery or total extra peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. Some studies showed the benefit of TAP block for early pain control following TAPP. Most of them were retrospective, some conducted with exclusion of obese or comorbid patients, some in mixed groups without separating patients with TAPP and TEP.

Thus, the evidence of TAP block efficiency prior to hernia repair in TAPP technique are of low quality.

Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) develops in up to 6% of patients after TAPP. Several studies have found that intense acute postoperative pain is a risk factor for CPIP after IHR. The investigators hypothesize, that preemptive TAP block temporary stops nociception and central sensitization from the surgical site thus reduce acute postoperative pain that theoretically provoke reducing the incidence of CPIP following IHR. Two studies suggest that TAP block may influence the incidence of CPIP after TAPP. Considering the retrospective study design of both and the insufficient sample size further randomized clinical trials are mandatory to estimate this hypothesis.

The aim of our study is to explore the possibilities of reducing acute and chronic pain after TAPP via implementation TAP block.

The sample size was calculated based on the randomized controlled trial data of patients after TEP IHR where postoperative VAS score at 4 h on coughing was 4.7±1.5 in the preemptive local anesthesia group and 6.1±1.9 in the control group. A sample size of 39 patients was required for each subgroup (total=78 patients) with a type I error rate α=0.05 and type II error rate β=0.1.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Inguinal Hernia

Keywords

  • transverse abdominis plane block
  • inguinal hernia
  • TAPP technique
  • chronic postoperative pain
  • acute pain
  • inguinal hernia surgery
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 699 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 78 is above the median of 60 across 2,160 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernia who are scheduled for elective Transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP)
  • Signed Informed consent to participation
  • ASA I-III
  • BMI ≤35 kg/m2

Non-inclusion Criteria:

  • Inguinoscrotal hernia (hernia passing through the entrance to the scrotum)
  • Previously diagnosed mental disorders
  • Patients receiving psychotropic drugs and drugs affecting adrenal cortex function (estrogens and systemic glucocorticoids)
  • Language barrier

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Deviations during the operation/anesthesia that required transfer to the intensive care unit or conversion to open surgery
  • Refusal to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
78 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TAP-block

    TAPP inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Patients receive unilateral US-guided TAP-block with 20 ml 0,375% Levobupivacaine before incision

    Procedure: Transversus abdominal plane block (TAP block)

  • No intervention
    Standard care

    TAPP inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation (without preemptive regional anesthesia) in accordance with actual standard of care.

Interventions

  • ProcedureTransversus abdominal plane block (TAP block)

    Unilateral US-guided TAP-block lateral approach with 20 ml 0,375% Levobupivacaine before incision

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute postoperative pain 4h

    Pain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) at rest and on coughing.

    Time frame: 4±1 hours postop

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acute postoperative pain 2h

    Pain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) at rest and on coughing.

    Time frame: 2±1 hours postop

  2. Acute postoperative pain 6h

    Pain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) at rest and on coughing.

    Time frame: 6±1 hours postop

  3. Number of Participants meeting discharge criteria

    Blood pressure ≥100/60 mm Hg; Activation within the department; Ability to oral medication (no postoperative nausea and vomiting); Pain (NRS) ≤3 points; No signs of complications (bleeding, early relapse)

    Time frame: 6±1 hours postop

  4. Analgetic consumption (dose quantity)

    At NRS score 4-6 at rest patients receive: 30mg Ketorolak IV no more than once every 8 hours or 1000mg Acetaminophen IV no more than once every 6 hours; At NRS score ≥7 at rest patients receive 100 mg Tramadol IV no more than once every 12 hours; The number of analgesic doses administered is counted.

    Time frame: 24 hours postop

  5. Concentration of serum cortisol

    nmol/L

    Time frame: At 8 am on the day of surgery, 4±1 hours postop

  6. Acute postoperative pain 24h

    Pain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) at rest and on coughing. Participants verbally requested to rate their pain: "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)". 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

    Time frame: 24±3 hours postop

  7. Length of stay

    Days

    Time frame: From date of hospitalization until the date of discharge

  8. Number of Participants with postoperative complications

    Number of Participants with postoperative complications, evaluated by Clavien-Dindo classification (telephone survey)

    Time frame: Postoperative 30 (±3) days

  9. Patient satisfaction score

    Patient satisfaction with treatment is assessed by telephone survey using the Linkert-type scale (1 - less satisfaction, 5 - more satisfaction)

    Time frame: Postoperative 30 (±3) days

  10. Number of Participants with chronic pain

    Pain score will be assessed by NRS (telephone survey). Participants verbally requested to rate their pain: "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)". 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

    Time frame: Postoperative 90 (±3) days

  11. Number of Participants with recurrence

    Participants undergo a telephone survey. Participants presenting with characteristic complaints are invited for examination and ultrasound scan.

    Time frame: After 90 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of faculty surgery №1 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
    Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aasvang EK, Gmaehle E, Hansen JB, Gmaehle B, Forman JL, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Kehlet H. Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain. Anesthesiology. 2010 Apr;112(4):957-69. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d31ff8. PubMed 20234307 ↗
  • Arora S, Chhabra A, Subramaniam R, Arora MK, Misra MC, Bansal VK. Transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.047. Epub 2016 May 28. PubMed 27555193 ↗
  • Chamzin A, Frountzas M, Gkiokas G, Kouskouni E, Xanthos T, Michalopoulos NV. The Effect of Intraoperative Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocking on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal (TAPP) Groin Hernia Repair. Front Surg. 2022 Feb 8;9:834050. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.834050. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35211504 ↗
  • Gao T, Zhang JJ, Xi FC, Shi JL, Lu Y, Tan SJ, Yu WK. Evaluation of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Hernia Surgery: A Meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2017 Apr;33(4):369-375. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000412. PubMed 27518492 ↗
  • Hosni M, Soulios, JP, Francart, D. Ultrasound transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local infiltration analgesia for acute and chronic postoperative pain control after laparoscopic bilateral hernia repair: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica. 2020; 71(4), 171-174. https://doi.org/10.56126/71.4.2
  • Hubbard G, Hubert C, Vudayagiri L, Tullington J, Merino K, Vaidya A, Gemma R. Transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a review. Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1059-1065. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02831-x. Epub 2023 Jul 3. PubMed 37395916 ↗
  • HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12. PubMed 29330835 ↗
  • Kim MG, Kim SI, Ok SY, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Park SY, Lee SM, Jung BI. The analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Sep;63(3):227-32. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.3.227. Epub 2012 Sep 14. PubMed 23060979 ↗
  • Paasch C, Fiebelkorn J, Berndt N, De Santo G, Aljedani N, Ortiz P, Gauger U, Boettge K, Anders S, Full H, Strik MW. The transversus abdominis plane block reduces the cumulative need of analgesic medication following inguinal hernia repair in TAPP technique: a retrospective single center analysis among 838 patients. Hernia. 2020 Dec;24(6):1371-1378. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02156-z. Epub 2020 Mar 13. Erratum In: Hernia. 2020 Dec;24(6):1419-1420. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02246-y. PubMed 32170456 ↗
  • Paasch C, Fiebelkorn J, De Santo G, Azarhoush S, Boettge K, Anders S, Gauger U, Strik M. The transversus abdominis plane block may reduce chronic postoperative pain one year after TAPP ingunial hernia repair. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 23;55:190-194. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.011. eCollection 2020 Jul. PubMed 32518639 ↗
  • Reinpold W. Risk factors of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review. Innov Surg Sci. 2017 May 12;2(2):61-68. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0017. eCollection 2017 Jun. PubMed 31579738 ↗
  • Takebayashi K, Matsumura M, Kawai Y, Hoashi T, Katsura N, Fukuda S, Shimizu K, Inada T, Sato M. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. Int Surg. 2015 Apr;100(4):666-71. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00193.1. PubMed 25875548 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06406959
Lead sponsor
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Responsible party
Taras V. Nechay (MD, Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 9, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 9, 2024

Study contacts

Taras Nechay, MD
Contact
tnechay@mail.ru
+79268146829

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion