CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06406712Updated May 7, 2026

Retroclavicular Block in Vascular Surgey

An interventional study of retroclavicular block in Pain Management, sponsored by New Valley University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-07.

Sponsored by New Valley University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The retroclavicular (coracoid) approach for brachial plexus anesthesia is recognized for its facility and simplicity to perform .

The block has been well described in the anesthesia community since it was first introduced by Hebbard and Royse in 2007 . In 2017, Luftig . first described the block's use in the ED setting for a variety of indications . Because of its different needle entry point, the retro clavicular (RCB) approach offers an almost perpendicular needle-ultrasound (US) beam angle.

Read the detailed description

Regional anesthesia (RA) offers several advantages over general anesthesia (GA) for upper limb orthopedic surgery. One of the advantages is the improvement in postoperative pain, which leads to decreased use of postoperative opioids needs and reduces the recovery time for patients . A variety of approaches for regional blockade for upper extremity surgery have been described.

Dexamethasone is a corticosteroid drug that has been used as an adjuvant to reduce postoperative pain.

The use of peri neural dexamethasone (i.e. dexamethasone added to the local anesthesia solution) as an adjuvant to peripheral nerve block to improve analgesia provided by local anesthetic alone . Peri neural dexamethasone, as an adjuvant to peripheral nerve block, has been associated with faster onset of anesthesia , longer duration of anesthesia/analgesia decreased postoperative pain intensity and decreased postoperative analgesia requirements compared with local anaesthetic alone . The exact mechanism by which dexamethasone reduces pain is not known. The decrease in pain intensity and the prolonged analgesia attained with the use of perineural dexamethasone may be the result of a local, or systemic action, or both . Dexamethasone may act locally on glucocorticosteroid receptors to induce vasoconstriction, thereby decreasing systemic absorption of local anaesthetics . Other potential mechanisms of action include suppression of C-fibre transmission of pain signals and direct action on the nerve cell to reduce neural discharge . Dexamethasone may act systemically by reducing the inflammatory response caused by surgical tissue injury .

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain Management

Browse trials for

03

In context

Agnosia

1,190 studies on the registry are indexed under Agnosia; 508 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is close to the median of 78 across 1,024 interventional studies indexed under Agnosia.

Browse Agnosia studies →

Lead sponsor

New Valley University is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing upper limb vascular surgey .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Contraindications to regional block (coagulopathy, infection at the needle insertion site, or diaphragmatic paralysis).
  • Altered conscious level.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Body mass index (BMI > 35).
  • Patients who have difficulty understanding the study protocol.
  • Patients who have any known contraindication to study medications.
  • Patient refusal.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    dexamethasone with bupivacaine in retroclavicular block

    40patients received 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%(in total 100 mg)+1 ml of dexamethasone)

    Other: retroclavicular block

  • Active comparator
    bupivacaine in retroclavicular block (control group)

    : 40patients received. 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%(in total 100 mg)+1 ml saline

    Other: retroclavicular block

Interventions

  • Otherretroclavicular block

    regional anesthesia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. sensory and motor duration of block

    efficacy of block

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Faculty of Medicine
    Asyut, Egypt
    • hassan abdel lataif, prof · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06406712
Lead sponsor
New Valley University
Responsible party
Ahmed Ismail Abdelsabour (lecture of anesthesia and ICU, New Valley University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 9, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2026

Study contacts

ahmed ismail, lecture
Contact
ahmed_ismail87@med.nvu.edu.eg
01097845491
ahmed ismail, lecture
principal investigator · faculty of medicine , new valley university

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion