CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06403150Updated Oct 7, 2026

The Efficacy and Safety of Levetiracetam Versus Fosphenytoin in Convulsive Status Epilepticus

A Phase 4 interventional study of Levetiracetam Injection and Fosphenytoin Injection in Status Epilepticus, sponsored by Dhaka Medical College. Completed at 1 site in Bangladesh. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.

Sponsored by Dhaka Medical College · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2023, registered Feb 2024).
Updated Oct 7, 2026Now CompletedStudy completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Status epilepticus (SE) is an emergency, life-threatening medical condition that may cause irreversible cerebral damage. Therefore, the rapid and secure cessation of seizures and resuscitation is crucial. Potent gamma-aminobutyric acid agonists, including benzodiazepines, are recommended as first-line treatments. For the complete cessation of SE and prevention of recurrence, long-acting antiepileptic drugs (e.g.- FPHT) are also required as second-line treatments along with short-acting benzodiazepines. Intravenous fosphenytoin (FPHT) is associated with fewer adverse events such as life-threatening arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, hypotension, and allergic reactions. Levetiracetam (LEV), is considered to be effective for SE with less serious adverse events including dizziness, somnolence, headache, and transient agitation, but there have been no reports of arrhythmias, hypotension, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or hepatotoxicity. Preceding studies show that levetiracetam is similarly effective and associated with fewer adverse effects than those of fosphenytoin. Few trials have compared the effectiveness and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) and fosphenytoin (FHP) for status epilepticus worldwide. Moreover, genetic variation is likely to play a crucial role in the development of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including drug resistance. By far, no study has yet been conducted addressing the issue of efficacy and safety between levetiracetam (LEV) and fosphenytoin (FHP) in status epilepticus in the context of the Bangladeshi population. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) and fosphenytoin (FHP) will be expected to give more confidence for the use of the drug. Considering this the study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) and fosphenytoin (FHP) in status epilepticus. This study finding has an implication in the treatment protocol which will be beneficial for the patients and physicians as well. Furthermore, it will give input to the policymaker for developing new guidelines regarding status epilepticus management and also encourage future research.

Read the detailed description

A randomized control trial will be conducted in the Department of Neurology, DMCH. Ethical approval will be obtained from the DMCH ethical review board before the study. After the selection of the subjects, the nature, purpose, and benefit of the study will be explained to each subject \& their legal attendants in detail. They will be encouraged for voluntary participation. Informed written consent will be taken from the participants or their legal attendants. Diagnosis of Status epilepticus will be made according to the criteria of the ILAE task force on classification of status epilepticus (2015). The history of previous disease and habits as well as demographics, the type of SE, seizure duration before treatment, the cause of SE and family history will be recorded. In both groups, height and body weight were estimated from body habitus, family information, or patient records. Blood pressure will be measured. BMI will be calculated as weight (kg)height (m)2. In all patients, neurological assessment will be conducted routinely. Randomized sampling methods will be applied for selecting study subjects. Randomization will be carried out into two groups. After that group A will be treated with FHP and group B will be treated with LEV. Resuscitation and stabilization will be simultaneously performed to ensure airway patency, oxygen inhalation to prevent cerebral hypoxia, securing intravenous access \& maintenance of blood pressure. Routine laboratory investigations (full blood count, blood glucose, electrolytes, calcium, magnesium, liver function test \& renal function test) will be done. EEG will be done in all patients.

At first, Diazepam will be intravenously administered at 10 mg to all patients. Then, if SE (Status Epilepticus) is not controlled within 20 minutes from Diazepam needle time, study participants will be rapidly randomized and allocated to the FPHT and LEV groups.

In the FPHT group, FPHT at 20 mg/kg (Phenytoin equivalent dose of 15 mg/kg) will be intravenously administered in 100mL of normal saline at an administration rate not exceeding 3mg/kg/min or 150 mg/min.

In the LEV group, LEV at 60 mg/kg (max dose 4500 mg) will be intravenously administered in 100mL of normal saline at an administration rate of 2-5mg/kg/min or over 10 minutes.

Then, after 30 minutes following FPHT/LEV needle time reassessment of the patient will be done to determine the outcomes.

If seizures continue after 30 minutes following FPHT/LEV needle time then, other injectable agents ( e.g- if FPHT given previously, can give LEV intravenously at 60 mg/kg [max dose 4500 mg] or if LEV given previously, can give FPHT intravenously at 20 mg/kg [Phenytoin equivalent dose of 15 mg/kg] ) will be given to the patient.

If seizures still continue after 30 minutes patient will be transferred to intensive care and the standard of care will be given according to intensive care unit protocol.

Once status controlled commence maintenance therapy with Levetiracetam 1000-1500 mg IV twice daily in case of Group-A patient or with FPHT 400 mg/day IV in case of Group-B patient. Subsequent anti-seizure medications will be given based on seizure semiology, etiology, electroencephalography (EEG) correlates, and age of the patient.

After the cessation of seizures, electroencephalography (EEG), neuroimaging (CT / MRI brain), CSF study \& other necessary investigations will be performed as needed. FPHT or LEV will be randomized only for the first administration after diazepam and their subsequent administration will be not regulated. The primary outcome will be the seizure cessation rate within 30 minutes of starting administration of the study drug. Secondary outcomes will be the seizure recurrence rate within 24 hours, which will be confirmed by an apparent seizure or non-convulsive seizure detected by EEG; the serious adverse event rate throughout the observational period potentially induced by the study drugs, such as cardiac arrest, life-threatening arrhythmia, respiratory arrest and hypotension and the intubation rate within 24hours. All the information will be recorded in a structured data collection sheet.

Patients will be followed up at 30 minutes, 24 hours, and at discharge after receiving medication and the following outcomes will be assessed: seizure cessation rate, seizure recurrence rate, intubation rate, all-cause in-hospital mortality, adverse effects of drugs, and mRS at discharge. All data will be collected, tabulated, and analyzed statistically using a personal computer and the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 26 (IBM, Chicago, Illinois, USA).

02

Conditions studied

  • Status Epilepticus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Status Epilepticus
  • Levetiracetam
  • Fosphenytoin
03

In context

Status Epilepticus

126 studies on the registry are indexed under Status Epilepticus; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is below the median of 70 across 74 interventional studies indexed under Status Epilepticus.

Browse Status Epilepticus studies →

Lead sponsor

Dhaka Medical College is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >18 years
  • Patients with convulsive status epilepticus
  • Both male and female
  • Willing to give consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with convulsive status epilepticus already intubated before treatment
  • Acute precipitant of seizure was major trauma, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, cardiac arrest, or post-anoxia
  • Known allergic to FPHT or LEV
  • Pregnant patient
  • Liver disease or severe renal impairment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Levetiracetam

    Levetiracetam at 60 mg/kg (max dose 4500 mg) will be intravenously administered in 100mL of normal saline at an administration rate of 2-5mg/kg/min or over 10 minutes.

    Drug: Levetiracetam Injection

  • Active comparator
    Fosphenytoin

    Fosphenytoin at 20 mg/kg (Phenytoin equivalent dose of 15 mg/kg) will be intravenously administered in 100mL of normal saline at an administration rate not exceeding 3mg/kg/min or 150 mg/min.

    Drug: Fosphenytoin Injection

Interventions

  • DrugLevetiracetam Injection

    Levetiracetam at 60 mg/kg (max dose 4500 mg) will be intravenously administered in 100mL of normal saline at an administration rate of 2-5mg/kg/min or over 10 minutes. After 30 minutes following Levetiracetam needle time reassessment of the patient will be done to determine the outcomes.

    Also known as: Iracet Injection, Neurocet Injection

  • DrugFosphenytoin Injection

    Fosphenytoin at 20 mg/kg (Phenytoin equivalent dose of 15 mg/kg) will be intravenously administered in 100mL of normal saline at an administration rate not exceeding 3mg/kg/min or 150 mg/min. After 30 minutes following the Fosphenytoin needle time reassessment of the patient will be done to determine the outcomes.

    Also known as: Fosfen Injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine the efficacy and safety between Levetiracetam and Fosphenytoin in adult convulsive status epilepticus.

    The measurement of a medicine desire effect under ideal conditions, such as clinical trial ( European medicine agency). It is measured as percentage in reduction of seizure frequency from the time of drug initiation and also measure the Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.

    Time frame: At 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Seizure cessation rate

    Seizure cessation rate was calculated by the ratio between number of patients admitted with status epilepticus and number of patient free from convulsion after administration of intervention drug

    Time frame: Thirty minutes

  2. Seizure recurrence rate within 24 hours

    seizure recurrence rate within 24 hours, which was confirmed by an apparent seizure or non-convulsive seizure detected by EEG

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Observe and compare the serious adverse event rate

    Any noxious, unintended and undesired effect (including an abnormal laboratory finding) of a drug which occurs at a dose used in humans for prophylactic, diagnostic or therapeutic purpose (WHO)

    Time frame: At 30 minutes, at 24 hours and at Hospital discharge

  4. Intubation rate within 24hours

    Patient need intubation and mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: 24 hours

  5. All-cause in-hospital mortality among patients

    Death during hospital admission period from all causes

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score

    The Modified Rankin Score (mRS) is a 6 point disability scale with possible scores ranging from 0 to 5. A separate category of 6 is usually added for patients who expire. mRS score '0' means patient has no residual symptoms and score '6' means patient has expired

    Time frame: At 30 minutes, at 24 hours and at Hospital discharge

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dhaka Medical College Hospital
    Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Demographic variables, Primary and Secondary outcomes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Enrolling by invitation→Completed
changed Oct 7, 2026
Study completion
Oct 2024→Aug 31, 2024 (actual)
Oct 7, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 7, 2026
    Enrolling by invitation→Completed
    Study completion Oct 2024→Aug 31, 2024 (now actual)
    + 3 other changes: verification date, secondary outcomes and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06403150
Lead sponsor
Dhaka Medical College
Responsible party
Dr. Reaz Mahmud (Assistant Professor, Dhaka Medical College) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2024
Start date
May 15, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2024
Completion
Aug 31, 2024
Last update
Oct 7, 2026

Study contacts

Dr Md Amirul Islam, MBBS
principal investigator · MD (Neurology) Phase B Resident
Professor Dr Kazi Gias Uddin Ahmed, MD
study chair · Professor of Neurology, Dhaka Medical College
Dr Reaz Mahmud, MD
study director · Assistant Professor of Neurology, Dhaka Medical College

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion