ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT06400511Updated Jan 7, 2026

A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pimecrolimus 0.3% Ophthalmic Ointment

A Phase 3 interventional study of Pimecrolimus 0.3% Ophthalmic Ointment and Placebo Ophthalmic Ointment in Blepharitis, sponsored by Famy Life Sciences, a Viatris Company. Terminated at 29 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-07.

Sponsored by Famy Life Sciences, a Viatris Company (part of Viatris Inc.) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor Decision

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
477
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Pimecrolimus 0.3% (MR-139) Ophthalmic Ointment.

Read the detailed description

The study is designed to evaluate Pimecrolimus 0.3% Ophthalmic Ointment in subjects with blepharitis to complete resolution (score = 0 on grading scale of 0-4) for eyelid debris after BID use at Week 6 in the Study Eye.

02

Conditions studied

  • Blepharitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Blepharitis

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Blepharitis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 477 is above the median of 60 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Blepharitis.

Browse Blepharitis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Famy Life Sciences, a Viatris Company as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female subjects aged ≥ 2 years of age or older at Visit 1, with a diagnosis of blepharitis confirmed by the investigator.
  2. Subjects under 18 must able to be examined at the slit lamp (handheld) without systemic anesthesia.
  3. A self-reported history of at least 1 previous episode of blepharitis.
  4. Adult subjects have provided verbal and written . For subjects under 16 years of age, a parent or legal guardian of each subject must provide written informed consent and sign the HIPAA form (or equivalent, if applicable), approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethical Committee (EC). Whenever practical and appropriate per local requirements, a child's assent should also be sought before inclusion into the study.
  5. Subjects who have not responded adequately to lid hygiene in the past (self-reported).
  6. Have a Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) greater than or equal to 0.7 logMar in each eye, assessed with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Subjects may be refracted if needed.
  7. Subjects must be able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including the ability to self-administer or receive topical treatment twice a day to their eyelid margins.
  8. Be literate and able to complete questionnaires independently, or in the case of pediatric patients, can comprehend the questionnaires with the help of a parent/guardian or interviewer.
  9. Women of (WOCBP) must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 and must be willing to use an adequate method of throughout the study and 30 days from the last application of the study treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who have received a COVID vaccination or recovered from COVID-19 symptoms less than 1 week prior to baseline visit.
  2. Subjects with a history of, or active herpetic or neurotrophic keratitis.
  3. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, have abnormal eyelid anatomy (other than due to blepharitis) that might adversely affect clinical signs and symptoms, including but not limited to lagophthalmos, malposition of the eyelid or tumor(s) of the eyelid or eyelid margin.
  4. Subjects who have received other treatments for blepharitis within 30 days of Visit 1.
  5. Subjects with known to study medications, or to any diagnostic agents to be used in the study.
  6. Subjects who are currently enrolled in an drug or device study or have used an investigational drug or device within the 30 days prior to the baseline visit and during the treatment period.
  7. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, would be unable to adhere to the study protocol.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
477 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pimecrolimus 0.3% Ophthalmic Ointment

    Study Drug

    Drug: Pimecrolimus 0.3% Ophthalmic Ointment

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Ophthalmic Ointment

    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo Ophthalmic Ointment

Interventions

  • Pimecrolimus 0.3% Ophthalmic Ointment will be applied twice a day to both eyelid margins.

  • DrugPlacebo Ophthalmic Ointment

    Placebo will be applied twice a day to both eyelid margins.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Study Drug

    Complete Resolution (score =0 on grading scale 0-4) of eyelid debris. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ocular Discomfort Score

    Proportion with at least 50% reduction from baseline in ODS at Week 6. Ocular discomfort is assessed by visual analog scale on a scale from 0-100 where 0 indicates no discomfort and 100 indicates maximum. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Collarettes

    Proportion of complete resolution for collarettes (score =0 on grading scale 0-4) at Week 6. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Eyelid Redness

    Proportion of complete resolution (score =0 on grading scale 0-4) for eyelid redness (erythema) at Week 6. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Ocular Discomfort Score

    The mean change from baseline in ODS at Week 6. Ocular discomfort is assessed by visual analog scale on a scale from 0-100 where 0 indicates no discomfort and 100 indicates maximum. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. Blepharitis Symptom Measurement

    Proportion of complete resolution (score =0 on grading scale of 0-3) for the Eye Irritation Symptom on the BLISS at Week 6. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  6. Eyelid Meibum Character

    Proportion of complete resolution (score = 0 on grading scale 0-24 for upper lid; 0-15 for lower lid) for eyelid meibum character at Week 6. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

29 sites
  • Clinical Investigative Site
    Pheonix, Arizona 85032, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Garden Grove, California 92843, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Glendale, California 91204, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Inglewood, California 90301, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Petaluma, California 94954, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Rancho Cordova, California 95670, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Crystal River, Florida 34429, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Largo, Florida 33773, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Tampa, Florida 33603, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30339, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Morrow, Georgia 30260, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Pittsburg, Kansas 66762, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40206, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Havre de Grace, Maryland 21078, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Medina, Minnesota 55340, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Kansas City, Missouri 64154, United States
  • Investigative Site
    St Louis, Missouri 63131, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Washington, Missouri 63090, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Garner, North Carolina 27529, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Smyrna, Tennessee 37167, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Lakeway, Texas 78738, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Clinton, Utah 84015, United States
  • Clinical Investigator Site
    Lynchburg, Virginia 24502, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06400511
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2024
Start date
Apr 22, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 9, 2025
Completion
Oct 15, 2025
Last update
Jan 7, 2026

Study contacts

Marian Macsai, MD
study director · Viatris Eye Care Division

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Pimecrolimus

Start the discussion