ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06400342REVIVE-TAVRUpdated Jan 24, 2025

Randomized Evaluation for Failed TAVR

An interventional study of TAVR-explant and Redo-TAVR in Symptomatic Patients Who Have Had Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) Failure, Prosthetic Valve Malfunction and Prosthesis Failure, sponsored by Medstar Health Research Institute. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-24.

Sponsored by Medstar Health Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
264
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

REVIVE TAVR is an acronym for the Randomized Evaluation of Valve-In-Valve versus Explantation for failed TAVR. This is a prospective, multicenter, global randomized trial investigating the safety and efficacy of reintervention for transcatheter heart valve (THV) failure by comparing redo-TAVR (TAV-in-TAV) with TAVR surgical explantation (TAVR-explant) in subjects who are suitable for both options in a real-world clinical setting

02

Conditions studied

  • Symptomatic Patients Who Have Had Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) Failure
  • Prosthetic Valve Malfunction
  • Prosthesis Failure

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prosthesis Failure

119 studies on the registry are indexed under Prosthesis Failure; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 264 is above the median of 36 across 69 interventional studies indexed under Prosthesis Failure.

Browse Prosthesis Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Medstar Health Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 161 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Heart Team has confirmed eligibility for both TAVR-explant and redo-TAVR for failed THV
  • Subject is symptomatic from their failed THV, as demonstrated by Functional Class ≥II
  • Subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits
  • Subject meets the legal minimum age to provide based on local regulatory requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis;
  • Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide for the trial/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits);
  • Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the Investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams;
  • Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant for the next 12 months;

Coronary obstruction risk:

  • Patients at risk of coronary obstruction may be enrolled into the randomized cohort if the operators determine that redo-TAVR can be safely accomplished with leaflet modification or other coronary protection strategies.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
264 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    TAVR-explant

    TAVR surgical explantation

    Procedure: TAVR-explant

  • Active comparator
    Redo-TAVR

    TAV-in-TAV

    Device: Redo-TAVR

Interventions

  • ProcedureTAVR-explant

    Surgical explantation of failed THV followed by surgical aortic valve replacement and any other cardiac surgeries deemed necessary.

  • DeviceRedo-TAVR

    Repeat transcatheter aortic valve implantation within a failed THV.

    Also known as: Valve-in-Valve, TAV-in-TAV

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite: All-cause mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization for cardiovascular causes

    Time to first event of any components of the composite endpoint.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Composite: All-cause mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization for cardiovascular causes

    Time to first event of any components of the composite endpoint.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality

    Cardiovascular mortality, Valve-related mortality, Non-cardiovascular mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. All-cause mortality

    Cardiovascular mortality, Valve-related mortality, Non-cardiovascular mortality

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Stroke

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Stroke

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Rehospitalization for cardiovascular causes

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Rehospitalization for cardiovascular causes

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Reintervention hospital length of stay (days)

    Time frame: 30 days

  8. Cardiovascular mortality

    Death meeting one of the following criteria: * related to heart failure, cardiogenic shock, bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, myocardial infarction, stroke, thromboembolism, bleeding, tamponade, vascular complication, arrhythmia or conduction system disturbances, cardiovascular infection (e.g. mediastinitis, endocarditis), or other clear cardiovascular cause * Intraprocedural death * Sudden death * Death of unknown cause Valve-related mortality - Death presumed to be related to bioprosthetic valve dysfunction

    Time frame: 30 days

  9. Cardiovascular mortality

    Death meeting one of the following criteria: * related to heart failure, cardiogenic shock, bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, myocardial infarction, stroke, thromboembolism, bleeding, tamponade, vascular complication, arrhythmia or conduction system disturbances, cardiovascular infection (e.g. mediastinitis, endocarditis), or other clear cardiovascular cause * Intraprocedural death * Sudden death * Death of unknown cause Valve-related mortality - Death presumed to be related to bioprosthetic valve dysfunction

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. VARC-3 bleeding

    Time frame: 30 days

  11. VARC-3 bleeding

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Vascular and access-related complications

    Time frame: 30 days

  13. Vascular and access-related complications

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. Cardiac structural complications

    Time frame: 30 days

  15. Cardiac structural complications

    Time frame: 12 months

  16. Other acute procedural and technical valve-related complications

    Time frame: 30 days

  17. Other acute procedural and technical valve-related complications

    Time frame: 12 months

  18. Conduction disturbance requiring permanent pacemaker implantation

    Time frame: 30 days

  19. Conduction disturbance requiring permanent pacemaker implantation

    Time frame: 12 months

  20. Acute kidney injury

    Time frame: 30 days

  21. Acute kidney injury

    Time frame: 12 months

  22. Myocardial infarction (adapted from 4th Universal, SCAI, and ARC-2 definitions)

    Time frame: 30 days

  23. Myocardial infarction (adapted from 4th Universal, SCAI, and ARC-2 definitions)

    Time frame: 12 months

  24. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) and failure (BVF) as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 Criteria.

    Time frame: 30 days

  25. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) and failure (BVF) as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 Criteria.

    Time frame: 12 months

  26. Echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic valve performance

    Time frame: 30 days

  27. Echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic valve performance

    Time frame: 12 months

  28. Change in NYHA class from Baseline

    Time frame: 30 days

  29. Change in NYHA class from Baseline

    Time frame: 12 months

  30. Change in Quality of life (KCCQ) from Baseline

    The KCCQ has a 0-100-point scale, where lower scores represent more severe symptoms and/or limitations and scores of 100 indicate no symptoms, no limitations, and excellent quality of life.

    Time frame: 30 days

  31. Change in Quality of life (KCCQ) from Baseline

    The KCCQ has a 0-100-point scale, where lower scores represent more severe symptoms and/or limitations and scores of 100 indicate no symptoms, no limitations, and excellent quality of life.

    Time frame: 12 months

  32. Technical Success

    * Freedom from mortality * Successful access, delivery of the device and retrieval of the delivery system * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication

    Time frame: 30 days

  33. Device Success (for Redo-TAVR)

    * Technical success * Freedom from mortality * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication * Intended performance of the valve

    Time frame: 30 days

  34. Safety Composite Endpoints

    * Early safety, which includes freedom from all-cause mortality, all stroke, VARC type 2-4 bleeding, major vascular, access-related or cardiac structural complication, acute kidney injury stage 3 or 4, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, new permanent pacemaker due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities and surgery or intervention related to the device. * Clinical efficacy * Valve-related long-term clinical efficacy

    Time frame: 30 days

  35. Technical Success

    Same as above (Technical Success outcome 34)

    Time frame: 12 months

  36. Device Success (for Redo-TAVR)

    Same as above (Device Success (for Redo-TAVR) outcome 35)

    Time frame: 12 months

  37. Safety Composite Endpoints

    Same as above (Safety Composite Endpoints outcome 36)

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06400342
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 1, 2034 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2036 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 24, 2025

Study contacts

Kassandra Lopez
Contact
kassandra.lopez@medstar.net
202-877-2452
Jake Sutton
Contact
Joseph.A.Sutton@medstar.net
202-877-6624
Ron Waksman, MD
principal investigator · MedStar Health Research Organization
Toby Rogers, MD
study chair · MedStar Health Research Organization
Thomas MacGillivray, MD
study chair · MedStar Health Research Organization
Michael Reardon, MD
study chair · MedStar Health Research Organization
Kalyan Chitturi, DO
study chair · MedStar Health Research Organization

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion