CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06399926Updated May 6, 2024

Efficacy and Safety of Intraventricule Pemetrexed Disodium Administered Via Ommaya Reservoir

An observational study in Leptomeningeal Metastasis and Lung Cancer, sponsored by Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-06.

Sponsored by Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a open-label, multi-center prospective observation study for the efficacy and safety of intraventricle pemetrexed disodium via ommaya reservoir in the treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis with lung cancer who have failed at least one targeted therapy. In detail: At least the treatment failure was after third-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated lung cancer; or at least the treatment failure was after second-generation ALK-TKIs in ALK-mutated lung cancer; or at least the treatment failure was after one-line of targeted-TKIs in ROS1-mutated non-squamous non-small lung cancer.

Read the detailed description

Participants were randomizedly assigned in cohort 1 who will be given pemetrexed 20mg every 24 hours for 72 hours every 2 weeks,or in cohort 2 will be given pemetrexed 30mg once a week.

It was designed for two stages on treatment course. Induction therapy: Efficacy evaluation every 2 cycles, and confirm the efficacy at the next cycle. If at the next cycle, the efficacy result changed (such as SD or PR after initial PD; or PD after initial SD or PR; the second time of efficacy assess was required). If the CSF cytology at the time of the efficacy evaluation was negative, one more cycle was required to confirm the CSF cytology.

Consolidation: If the efficacy is remission(including complete remission, obvious remission, or partial remission) or stable disease for initial timepoint and the timepoint of the confirmed evaluation; then the patient will be advanced to the stage of consolidation treatment. Participants in cohort 1 who will be given pemetrexed 20mg every 24 hours for 72 hours every 3 weeks. Participants in cohort 2 will be given pemetrexed 30mg every 3 weeks. Until the toxicity is intolerable, or disease progression.

Cross over: Compared the first 4 enrolled cases in each group; the comprehensive evaluation(including efficacy, cytology negative, toxicity) in better group(50% higher efficacy or 50% less toxicity) will be the following cohort, to which the other one will crossover.

02

Conditions studied

  • Leptomeningeal Metastasis
  • Lung Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Leptomeningeal Metastasis
  • Ommaya reservoir
  • Pemetrexed
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

3,517 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 885 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 64 is below the median of 121 across 594 observational studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Xiangya Hospital of Central South University is the lead sponsor of 170 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with oncogene-driven and failed at least one-line of targeted therepy ( EGFR/ALK/ROS1); At least failure after third-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated lung cancer. At least failure after second-generation ALK-TKIs in ALK-mutated lung cancer. At least failure after one line of targeted-TKIs in ROS1-mutated non-squamous non-small lung cancer.

Inclusion criteria

  1. confirmed pathologic diagnosis (histologic type of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in the primary lesion or metastatic lesion) with definitely genetic testing results (EGFR/ALK/ROS1);
  2. In accordance with the CSCO Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Central Nervous System Tumors, and the EANO-ESMO diagnostic criteria: a diagnosis of type I meningeal metastatic carcinoma is made when cerebrospinal fluid cytology testing reveals anisocytosis (3 consecutive tests are required if the cerebrospinal fluid cytology testing is initially negative for the patient) (one study showed that the specificity of anisocytosis in diagnosing meningeal metastases in patients with solid tumors was 100%) or meningeal lesions Biopsy confirms the diagnosis. (Type IIA-C meningeal metastases: negative or atypical cerebrospinal fluid cytology, MRI showing linear or/and nodular meningeal enhancement\^ with typical clinical symptoms*).

    • MRI: at least 1.5T; demonstrates sulcal, smear, or linear ventricular enhancement, cranial nerve root enhancement or nodular meningeal enhancement, or cauda equina spinal enhancement; control enhancement T1-weighted sequences and Flair sequences; nodularity is defined as foci of ≥ 5x10mm enhancement; sequences of choice: cranial planar enhancement + T2Flair (enhancement) or and total spinal planar enhancement (when suspicion of spinal involvement); 3D T1 enhancement (involved cranial nerves - optional); cerebrospinal fluid flow imaging (functional or anatomic).

      • Typical clinical manifestations: headache, nausea, vomiting; epilepsy; mental changes, gait difficulties; cranial nerve damage (diplopia, visual abnormalities, hearing abnormalities, facial nerve palsy, difficulty chewing, difficulty swallowing, choking, etc.); neurogenic signs (cauda equina symptoms, mainly perineal numbness, tingling, defecation and urination disturbances, weakness or incomplete paralysis of both lower limbs); sensorimotor defects of the limbs; cervical back Radicular pain; be careful to differentiate from signs and symptoms of brain parenchymal metastases, extracranial disease, treatment-related adverse effects, and non-tumor comorbidities.

        1. Based on the guideline-driven first-line choice of TKI agents for gene-positive patients, enrolment would therefore require: failure of at least three generations of EGFR-TKIs for patients with EGFR mutations; failure of at least second-generation ALK inhibitors for ALK mutations; and failure of at least one ROS1 inhibitor for ROS1 mutations.
        1. No contraindication to Ommaya capsule implantation. 5. Female subjects who are capable of becoming pregnant must agree to use reliable contraception throughout the trial; male subjects whose female partner is capable of becoming pregnant must agree to use reliable contraception throughout the trial.
        1. patients must sign an informed consent form and must be willing and able to comply with visits, treatment regimens, laboratory tests and other requirements as specified in the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. HBsAg-positive patients may be enrolled, but patients with higher than normal viral copy number or HBcAb-positive patients should receive effective anti-HBV treatment until 6 months after the end of the trial. HCV RNA carriers may be enrolled, but need to receive effective anti-HCV treatment throughout the trial, and continue to receive effective anti-HCV treatment until 6 months after the end of the trial.
  2. human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  3. significant extracranial lesion progression or extensive extracranial lesions causing severe symptoms that cannot be effectively treated.
  4. patients with extreme emaciation or cachexia.
  5. Extensive parenchymal brain lesions with severe symptoms that cannot be effectively treated.
  6. patients with other malignant tumors that are currently undergoing treatment.
  7. have received or will receive a live vaccine within 30 days prior to signing the informed consent form.
  8. other conditions that, in the judgment of the investigator, may affect subject safety or trial compliance, including symptomatic heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, active infections (including tuberculosis infections) requiring systemic therapy; or severe organ dysfunction, with creatinine clearance \<45 ml/min calculated from glomerular filtration rate by the Cockcroft-Gault formula or by the Tc99m-DPTA serum clearance method; an absolute neutrophil count \<0.5 x 109/L; a platelet count \<25 x 109/L, or in patients with severe active visceral bleeding; or severe Abnormal liver function (bilirubin greater than 3.0 times upper limit of normal; AST and ALT greater than 5.0 times upper limit of normal).
  9. patients with known hypersensitivity to pemetrexed with a history of serious adverse reactions, and patients with potentially life-threatening conditions for reuse.
  10. pregnant or lactating women.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Pemetrexed 20mg

    Pemetrexed 20mg every 24 hours for 72 hours every 2 weeks until efficacy evaluated remission or stable ; change to every 3 weeks.

    Drug: Pemetrexed injection · Drug: Pemetrexed

  • Pemetrexed 30mg

    Pemetrexed 30mg D1 every week until efficacy evaluated remission or stable ; change to every 3 weeks.

    Drug: Pemetrexed injection · Drug: Pemetrexed

Interventions

  • DrugPemetrexed injection

    Group 1(20mg):induction stage is 20 mg per 24 hours for 72 hours, every 2 weeks; consolidation stage is 20mg per 24 hours for 72 hours, every 3 weeks.

    Also known as: Alimta

  • DrugPemetrexed

    Group 2(30mg):induction stage is 30 mg D1,every week.Consolidation stage is 30 mg D1,every 3 weeks.

    Also known as: Alimta

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Objective response rate,ORR

    ORR is the ratio of the patients who achieve the complete remission(CR), obvious remission(OR), or partial remission(PR) to the included patients eligible for efficacy assessment. complete remission(one of the following items): normal RANO;normal Glasgow Coma Scale;KPS≥90. obvious remission(one of the following items): the improvement of at least 70% items on the RNAO examinations; Glasgow Coma Scale≥12 or at lease 3 scores increase compared to baseline; KPS≥70 or at lease 30 scores increase compared to baseline. partial remission(one of the following items):the improvement of at least 50% items on the RNAO examinations; Glasgow Coma Scale≥9 or at lease 2 scores increase compared to baseline; KPS 50-70 or at lease 20 scores increase compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disease control rate,DCR

    DCR is the ratio of the patients who achieve the CR, OR, PR,or SD to the included patients eligible for efficacy assessment. complete remission(one of the following items): normal RANO;normal Glasgow Coma Scale;KPS≥90. obvious remission(one of the following items): the improvement of at least 70% items on the RNAO examinations; Glasgow Coma Scale≥12 or at lease 3 scores increase compared to baseline; KPS≥70 or at lease 30 scores increase compared to baseline. partial remission(one of the following items):the improvement of at least 50% items on the RNAO examinations; Glasgow Coma Scale≥9 or at lease 2 scores increase compared to baseline; KPS 50-70 or at lease 20 scores increase compared to baseline. stable disease (one of the following items ):the improved items on the RNAO examinations less than 50%; the change of Glasgow Coma Scale within 1 score compared to baseline; the change of KPS within 10 scores.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. progression-free survival,PFS

    time to the progression of disease. Progression of disease(one of the following items): The deterioration of at least 25% items on the RNAO examinations; the drop of Glasgow Coma Scale more than 1 score compared to baseline; the drop of KPS score more than 10 scores.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. overall survival,OS

    time to the death or loss of follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. CSF cytology clearance

    negative results using glass slide centrifugation accompanied with staining

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Adverse effect(AE) and severe Adverse effect(SAE)

    number of participants with treatment-related adverse events or severe adverse effect as assessed by CTCAE 5.0

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Xiangya Hospital Central South University
    Changsha, Hunan 410008, China
    • bin li, doctor · Contact · 13467713587
    • xiangping li, pharmacist · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Maynard A, McCoach CE, Rotow JK, Harris L, Haderk F, Kerr DL, Yu EA, Schenk EL, Tan W, Zee A, Tan M, Gui P, Lea T, Wu W, Urisman A, Jones K, Sit R, Kolli PK, Seeley E, Gesthalter Y, Le DD, Yamauchi KA, Naeger DM, Bandyopadhyay S, Shah K, Cech L, Thomas NJ, Gupta A, Gonzalez M, Do H, Tan L, Bacaltos B, Gomez-Sjoberg R, Gubens M, Jahan T, Kratz JR, Jablons D, Neff N, Doebele RC, Weissman J, Blakely CM, Darmanis S, Bivona TG. Therapy-Induced Evolution of Human Lung Cancer Revealed by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing. Cell. 2020 Sep 3;182(5):1232-1251.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.017. Epub 2020 Aug 20. PubMed 32822576 ↗
  • Thakkar JP, Kumthekar P, Dixit KS, Stupp R, Lukas RV. Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors. J Neurol Sci. 2020 Apr 15;411:116706. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116706. Epub 2020 Jan 23. PubMed 32007755 ↗
  • Mack F, Baumert BG, Schafer N, Hattingen E, Scheffler B, Herrlinger U, Glas M. Therapy of leptomeningeal metastasis in solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Feb;43:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 24. PubMed 26827696 ↗
  • Ommaya AK. Subcutaneous reservoir and pump for sterile access to ventricular cerebrospinal fluid. Lancet. 1963 Nov 9;2(7315):983-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)90681-0. No abstract available. PubMed 14059058 ↗
  • Montes de Oca Delgado M, Cacho Diaz B, Santos Zambrano J, Guerrero Juarez V, Lopez Martinez MS, Castro Martinez E, Avendano Mendez-Padilla J, Mejia Perez S, Reyes Moreno I, Gutierrez Aceves A, Gonzalez Aguilar A. The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis. Front Oncol. 2018 Nov 20;8:509. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00509. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30524956 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — we will share the some dates to the website:http://www.medresman.org.cn/login.aspx or publication of results of clinical trials in the form of papers

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06399926
Lead sponsor
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Collaborators
First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Xiangtan Central Hospital
Responsible party
Bin Li, MD (Associated professor, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 6, 2024
Start date
Oct 30, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 6, 2024

Study contacts

bin Li, doctor
Contact
bincsuxy@csu.edu.cn
13467713587
xiangping Li, pharmacist
Contact
xylxping@126.com
13873181829
bin Li, doctor
principal investigator · Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion