CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06397456iPREP-RRTUpdated Nov 14, 2025

Intensive Patient Referral and Education Program Prior to Renal Replacement Therapy

An interventional study of In-Person Patient Education and Commitment to Change in Chronic Kidney Disease and Hypertension, sponsored by University of Chicago. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-14.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intensive Patient Referral and Education Program prior to Renal Replacement Therapy (iPREP-RRT) is a 12-week intervention that identifies hospitalized African Americans with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and provides them with hospital- and community-based education, navigation and self-management support. Participants will be randomized to the iPREP-RRT intervention versus enhanced usual care.

Read the detailed description

The Intensive Patient Referral and Education Program prior to Renal Replacement Therapy (iPREP-RRT) will determine the efficacy of the hospital-based patient intervention (HPI) in improving patient knowledge, self-efficacy, and intent for chronic kidney disease (CKD) self-management and renal replacement therapy (RRT) planning; and 2) determine the efficacy of the community-based patient intervention (CPI) during a 12 week outpatient follow-up program that combines outpatient follow-up with multiple modes of communication (in-person session, phone calls and personalized text messaging) and navigation in increasing participants' initiation and maintenance of CKD self-management and RRT planning, compared to enhanced usual care (attention controls).

The goal is to improve knowledge and outcomes for African American patients with advanced CKD through the iPREP-RRT. To accomplish this goal, investigators will 1) determine the efficacy of the hospital-based patient intervention (HPI) in improving participant knowledge, self-efficacy, and intent for CKD self-management and RRT planning; and 2) determine the efficacy of the community-based patient intervention (CPI) during a 12 week outpatient program that combines outpatient follow-up with multiple modes of communication (in-person session, phone calls and personalized text messaging) and navigation in increasing initiation and maintenance of CKD self-management and RRT planning, compared to enhanced usual care. To that end, investigators will conduct a one-site randomized controlled trial, where participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either the intervention (iPREP-RRT) or control groups (enhanced usual care). The randomization will be stratified by baseline blood pressure (controlled or uncontrolled). Participants will receive 2 in-person education sessions (during hospitalization and week 12), phone sessions at weeks 4 and 8, and weekly personalized text message contact. The duration of the intervention will be 12 weeks, and participants and controls will be assessed pre-intervention, immediately post-hospital based intervention, at 4 ,8 and 12 weeks during community-based intervention and 4 weeks post-intervention (16 weeks).

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Hypertension

Keywords

  • Hospitalized Patients
  • African American
  • Motivational Interviewing
03

In context

Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

3,144 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; 704 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 74 across 2,176 interventional studies indexed under Renal Insufficiency, Chronic.

Browse Renal Insufficiency, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 907 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 99 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 68 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over the age of 18 and under 70
  • Admitted to the University of Chicago inpatient general medicine service
  • Likely hospital stay greater than 48 hours
  • Diagnosis of advanced CKD (Stage 3B or above, as determine by problem list, ICD- 10 codes or eGFR\<45 during admission and from previous medical encounters)
  • Self-identify as Black or African American

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking
  • Unable to communicate due to current medical status
  • Unable to consent due to mental status
  • Expected hospital stay less than 24 hour
  • Current admission in ICU
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intensive Intervention (iPREP RRT)

    The intervention is administered by a patient educator (PE), a culturally concordant health educator. S/he will review the CKD and RRT education materials on a tablet device with the participant, answer any questions they have, and using motivational interviewing techniques get a commitment for future action. The participant and the patient educator will work together to decide on potential CKD self-management and RRT options and/or next steps. The PE will teach the participant how to use the home blood pressure monitor and will leave it with the participant. The patient educator will check in with the participant through text messages and follow-up phone calls.

    Behavioral: In-Person Patient Education · Behavioral: Commitment to Change · Behavioral: Blood pressure monitoring · Behavioral: Text-based reinforcement for CKD self-management · Behavioral: Community-based education session, reinforcement for self-management

  • Placebo comparator
    Enhanced Usual Care

    The enhanced usual care is administered by a patient educator (PE), a culturally concordant health educator. The PE will drop off written general health education materials. The patient educator will check in with the participant through text messages.

    Behavioral: Written Patient Education · Behavioral: Text-based reinforcement for general health self-management

Interventions

  • BehavioralIn-Person Patient Education

    In-person patient education about CKD, CKD risk factor management and renal replacement therapy options.

  • BehavioralCommitment to Change

    Motivational interviewing to assist participants in committing to change in CKD management or RRT selection.

  • BehavioralBlood pressure monitoring

    Participants will learn how to check their blood pressure and will receive a blood pressure cuff for home.

  • BehavioralWritten Patient Education

    Written patient education booklet about general health care management including taking medications, having a primary care doctor, weight management and exercise.

  • BehavioralText-based reinforcement for CKD self-management

    Patient educator will use text messages based on social cognitive theory to remind participants about and reinforce goals set around CKD self-management, blood pressure control and RRT selection

  • BehavioralCommunity-based education session, reinforcement for self-management

    Patient educator will use provide a "booster" session based on social cognitive theory to remind participants about and reinforce goals set around CKD self-management, blood pressure control and RRT selection

  • BehavioralText-based reinforcement for general health self-management

    Patient educator will use text messages to send general health management messages

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Kidney Disease Knowledge Questionnaire (KIKS)

    The Kidney Disease Knowledge Questionnaire (KIKS) is a validated instrument that assesses CKD knowledge. Scores range from 0 (no knowledge)-28 (full knowledge). Change =Post intervention-Baseline scores, and Follow-up (Week 4, Week 12, Week 16)-Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day Post Brief Intervention, Week 4, Week 12, Week 16

  2. ESRD Knowledge

    The Kidney Failure Treatment Knowledge is an investigator developed tool that assesses knowledge of 6 ESKD treatment options using a Likert scale (0=no knowledge and 4=a great deal of knowledge). Possible scores range from 0-24. Change =Post intervention-Baseline scores, and Follow-up (Week 4, Week 12, Week 16)-Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day Post Brief Intervention, Week 4, Week 12, Week 16

  3. Blood Pressure Knowledge

    Blood Pressure Knowledge Scale (BPKS, revised) is an 11-item scale; a summed score is computed. Scores range from 7 to 77 and higher scores indicate greater knowledge. Change =Post intervention-Baseline scores, and Follow-up (Week 4, Week 12, Week 16)-Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day Post Brief Intervention, Week 4, Week 12, Week 16

  4. CKD Self-Management

    The CKD Self-Management Knowledge Toolkit (CKD-SMKT) is a validated 10 item survey to assess participants CKD self-management behaviors. The survey consists of 2 true /false questions for each of the 10 self-care domains and can be scored from 0 (no self-care) to 20 (full self-care). Change is Follow-up Score (Week 8, Week 12, Week 16)-Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. CKD Self-Efficacy

    CKD Self-Efficacy Scale (CKD-SE), 25-item CKD-SE instrument can be used for the early identification of patients with low self-efficacy. The scale is from 0 to 10 points, and a larger number indicates a higher level of confidence regarding the management activity. The total score on the scale ranges between 25 and 250. The total score can be classified into three categories: low self-efficacy (score less than 30), moderate (scores between 30 to 70), and high self-efficacy (score more than 70). Change is Follow-up Score (Week 8, Week 12, Week 16)-Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day Post Brief Intervention, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

  2. CKD Health Intent

    The Health Intent Survey is an investigator-developed tool to measure participants stated intent to make healthy lifestyle changes. There are 12 questions each scored on a 5 point scale from 1=extremely unlikely to 5=extremely likely (60 total possible points with higher scores better). Change=Follow-up (1 day post-intervention, Wk4, wk 8, wk 12, wk16) - baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day Post-Brief Intervention, Week 4

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Chicago Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Will share de-identified, aggregate data with other researchers. Additional sharing not permitted by current IRB permission.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06397456
Lead sponsor
University of Chicago
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 3, 2024
Start date
Sep 4, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 14, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion