ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06391892LIQUIPANCUpdated Nov 3, 2026

Liquid Biopsy (ctDNA) Guided Treatment in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Neoadjuvant CTX vs. Upfront Surgery

A Phase 2 interventional study of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgery and Upfront surgery in Pancreatic Cancer, Circulating Tumor Cell and Predictive Cancer Model, sponsored by Elisabethinen Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Elisabethinen Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered Apr 2024).
Updated Nov 3, 2026Now Active, not recruitingPrimary completion moved+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the clinical prognostic impact (on DFS and OS) of liquid biopsy guided treatment vs. standard of care (physicians choice) in localized pancreatic cancer (CA 19-9 levels \<500, no vessel contact and recommended by multidisciplinary tumor board). ctDNA positive patients are randomized to either receive neoadjvuant chemotherapy at current gold standard physicians choice vs. upfront surgery because of assumed high biological risk for early recurrence of ctDNA+. ctDNA- will receive upfront surgery in adherence to local guidelines.

Read the detailed description

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by high recurrence rates and poor long-term survival, even following potentially curative surgical resection and modern multimodal treatment. Despite improvements in surgical techniques, perioperative management, and systemic chemotherapy, a substantial proportion of patients with anatomically resectable PDAC experience early disease recurrence, suggesting the presence of occult systemic disease that cannot be adequately identified by conventional staging methods.

Current treatment decisions are primarily based on radiological resectability, clinical performance status, and established biomarkers such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). However, these parameters provide limited information about individual tumor biology and the risk of early recurrence. Consequently, patients with apparently favorable anatomical characteristics may still harbor biologically aggressive disease.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive biomarker for assessing tumor biology, monitoring treatment response, and predicting oncological outcomes. In previous studies, the investigators demonstrated that an early decrease in ctDNA levels of at least 42% after two weeks of systemic chemotherapy could predict subsequent radiological treatment response with high sensitivity and specificity, substantially earlier than conventional imaging (Kirchweger et al., Frontiers in Oncology, 2022). Furthermore, pretherapeutic ctDNA positivity in patients with localized PDAC was associated with significantly shorter disease-free survival (3.3 vs. 18.1 months), despite the absence of radiological evidence of advanced or metastatic disease (Kirchweger et al., European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2021).

These findings suggest that pretherapeutic ctDNA detection may identify patients at increased risk of early recurrence who could potentially benefit from neoadjuvant systemic treatment, even when conventional clinical and radiological criteria favor upfront surgery.

However, a universal neoadjuvant treatment approach for all patients with anatomically resectable PDAC remains controversial. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy may provide early systemic disease control and reveal aggressive tumor biology, it also exposes patients to treatment-related toxicity, potential deterioration in quality of life, and the risk of losing the opportunity for surgical resection due to disease progression or treatment intolerance. Therefore, a more individualized treatment strategy incorporating biological risk assessment may help optimize treatment sequencing.

The LIQUIPANC study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial investigating the prognostic and potential clinical utility of ctDNA-guided treatment strategies in patients with anatomically resectable PDAC.

Eligible patients have localized PDAC without radiological vessel involvement, CA19-9 levels below 500 U/mL, and a multidisciplinary tumor board recommendation for upfront surgical resection based on conventional staging.

Following informed consent, approximately 30 mL of peripheral blood is collected before the initiation of oncological treatment. Plasma-derived ctDNA is analyzed using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), primarily targeting KRAS G12/G13 mutations, with additional KRAS Q61 testing if the initial analysis is negative.

Treatment allocation is determined as follows:

ctDNA-positive patients: Patients with detectable ctDNA are randomized to one of two treatment strategies:

Neoadjuvant treatment arm: Patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to current standards of care and the treating physician's choice, followed by surgical resection when clinically feasible and subsequent treatment according to local guidelines.

Standard-of-care arm: Patients undergo upfront surgical resection, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and further treatment according to current local guidelines and the treating physician's choice.

ctDNA-negative patients: Patients without detectable ctDNA are not randomized and undergo upfront surgical resection in accordance with the multidisciplinary tumor board recommendation and current local standards of care, followed by adjuvant treatment as indicated.

The randomized comparison among ctDNA-positive patients aims to investigate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared with upfront surgery, improves oncological outcomes in patients with potentially unfavorable tumor biology.

The overall study population will additionally be evaluated to investigate the prognostic significance of baseline ctDNA status and its association with disease recurrence and survival.

The primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS) and the prognostic value of ctDNA detection are evaluated as additional outcomes.

LIQUIPANC aims to provide prospective clinical evidence regarding the feasibility and potential value of incorporating liquid biopsy into treatment decision-making for anatomically resectable PDAC. Ultimately, the study seeks to support a more personalized approach to treatment sequencing by identifying patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant systemic therapy while avoiding potentially unnecessary treatment delays and toxicity in others.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Circulating Tumor Cell
  • Predictive Cancer Model
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,896 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 1,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 47 across 2,932 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Elisabethinen Hospital is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • >18 years old
  • localized pancreatic cancer to go for upfront surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • synchronous secondary
  • pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ctDNA+ _ctDNA guided

    All patients enrolled in the study have anatomically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), without radiological vessel involvement and with CA19-9 levels below 500 U/mL, and have been recommended for upfront surgical resection by a multidisciplinary tumor board. Patients with detectable pretherapeutic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are considered at increased biological risk for early disease recurrence and are randomized 1:1 to either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or upfront surgery. Patients allocated to this experimental arm receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to current standards of care and the treating physician's choice, followed by surgical resection when clinically feasible and subsequent treatment according to local guidelines.

    Procedure: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgery

  • Other
    Standard of care

    Patients assigned to this arm undergo upfront surgical resection as recommended by the multidisciplinary tumor board, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent treatment according to current standards of care and the treating physician's choice. This arm includes two prespecified patient subgroups: ctDNA-positive patients randomized to upfront surgery as part of the randomized comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ctDNA-negative patients assigned to upfront surgery without randomization, in accordance with standard treatment recommendations. The primary randomized treatment comparison is restricted to ctDNA-positive patients. The ctDNA-negative subgroup is evaluated separately for exploratory analyses of the prognostic significance of baseline ctDNA status and oncological outcomes.

    Procedure: Upfront surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureNeoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgery

    All patients included into the study are recommended to go for upfront surgery (CT and CA19-9) by tumor board. If preoperative ctDNA is positive, the investigators assume high risk for early recurrence (because of systemic tumor burden) and apply neoadjuvant chemotherapy at physicians choice instead. * Apart from blood collection (within the scope of clinical routine), there is no additional diagnostic intervention performed on the patient. * The respective neoadjuvant chemotherapeutical drug will be selected and applied by the treating medical oncologist at physicians choice (unaffected by study participation), usually mFOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/nabPaclitaxel at standardized dosage recommended by NCCN and local guidelines. FOLFIRONOX: Folinic acid (also known as leucovorin), F - Fluorouracil (5-FU), IRIN - Irinotecan, OX - Oxaliplatin.

    Also known as: Experimental

  • ProcedureUpfront surgery

    Standard of care as recommended by tumor board (not affected by study conditions).

    Also known as: Standard of care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. DFS

    Disease free survival

    Time frame: After 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. OS

    Overall survival

    Time frame: After 12 months

  2. ctDNA detection rate

    Detection rate of ctDNA in peripheral blood using a cost-effective and clinical applicable small spectrum ddPCR analysis in order to enable immediate clinical implementation

    Time frame: Preoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2024 to primary completion in Jun 2026, 28 months.

Of 324 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Pancreatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 60 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 36 and three quarters within 80. This study's 28 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 393 studies reached it within 57 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 80.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Nov 3, 2026: primary completion Dec 2025 → Jun 2026 and completion Dec 2026 → Jun 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 20, 2024
First posted
Apr 30, 2024
StartActual
Jan 11, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jun 1, 2026was Dec 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2027was Dec 2026
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Nov 3, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025→Jun 1, 2026 (actual)
Nov 3, 2026
Study completion
Dec 31, 2026→Jun 1, 2027
Nov 3, 2026
Interventions
Arm changed ctDNA guided→ctDNA+ _ctDNA guided
Nov 3, 2026
Design
Phase 3→Phase 2
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    Primary completion Dec 31, 2025→Jun 1, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Dec 31, 2026→Jun 1, 2027
    Interventions Arm changed ctDNA guided→ctDNA+ _ctDNA guided
    Design Phase 3→Phase 2
    + 5 other changes: verification date, description, contact details, site details and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06391892
Lead sponsor
Elisabethinen Hospital
Responsible party
Patrick Kirchweger (Principal Investigator, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Schwestern Linz) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 30, 2024
Start date
Jan 11, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Patrick Kirchweger, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Ordensklinikum Linz, Department of Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion