CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06385769Updated Apr 26, 2024

Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Neurogenic Overactive Bladder After Stroke

An interventional study of Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and Sham Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) in Urinary Bladder, Overactive, sponsored by Pamukkale University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-26.

Sponsored by Pamukkale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study based on the placebo technique to evaluate the efficacy of TTNS versus placebo in patients with OAB after stroke.

The main questions aimed to be answered are:

What are the effects of Trans Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS) on incontinence-related clinical parameters and quality of life in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) after stroke compared to the placebo group? Participants (n:22) with post-stroke AAM who meet the exclusion and inclusion criteria will be divided into 2 groups using a randomization table. The first group will receive TTNS (n:11) and the second group will receive placebo TTNS (n:11). Measurements will be performed twice in total, before treatment and at the end of treatment (4th week).

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Keywords

  • Overactive bladder after stroke
  • Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation
  • Urinary incontinence
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

855 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 125 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 22 is below the median of 72 across 652 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Pamukkale University is the lead sponsor of 331 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 40 and above with stable ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
  • Patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity symptoms accompanied by urinary incontinence complaints and a urinary frequency of 9 or more.
  • Patients diagnosed with detrusor overactivity on urodynamic evaluation.
  • Patients with hemiplegia lasting between 30 days and 1 year.
  • Ability to understand procedures, benefits, and potential side effects.
  • Patients scoring 22 or above on the Mini Mental Test.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with post-stroke neurogenic detrusor overactivity receiving or previously received pharmacological treatment.
  • Patients using intermittent catheterization or permanent catheterization as a bladder emptying method.
  • Patients with a history of urinary incontinence and/or urinary retention before stroke.
  • History of past urogynecological surgery.
  • Presence of urinary tract infection, bladder tumor, or cardiac pacemaker.
  • Significant fluid infusion requirement affecting urination or use of medication affecting bladder function.
  • Patients who have received botulinum toxin injection for post-stroke neurogenic detrusor overactivity.
  • Patients with postvoid residual volume above 150 mL.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
22 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)

    In this study, one channel of the stimulation device will provide active stimulation to the patient, while the second channel will not be connected. The patient won't know which channel is active. Both channels will use continuous mode with a pulse frequency of 20 Hz and a pulse width of 200 ms. The intensity for the active channel will be adjusted based on comfort level and observed hallux reaction. Treatment includes 20 sessions of 30 minutes each, administered five times a week for four weeks.

    Other: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)

    In the placebo group, the same electrotherapy device and settings as the active group will be used. One channel will not be connected to the patient but will display treatment details on the screen. The other channel will be connected but deliver no stimulation. Intensity for the inactive channel is limited to 2-3 mA. Patients will be informed that exceeding this threshold is prevented. Treatment includes 20 sessions of 30 minutes each, administered twice a week for four weeks.

    Other: Sham Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)

Interventions

  • OtherTranscutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)

    The TTNS will be conducted unilaterally, with the patient in a supine position, using a surface electrode dual stimulation channel stimulation device. Two self-adhesive round surface electrodes will be positioned with the negative electrode 2 cm behind the medial malleolus and the positive electrode 10 cm proximal to it. The ground electrode will be placed on the ipsilateral limb. Channel 1 will provide active stimulation, while channel 2 will remain inactive.

  • OtherSham Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)

    Sham TTNS group will be stimulated using the same electrotherapy device, with patients positioned identically and electrodes placed in the same positions as in the TTNS group. The current characteristics (pulse frequency 20 Hz and pulse width 200 ms) will also remain consistent across both channels. The second channel of the stimulation device will be designated as the channel connected to the patient but without delivering stimulation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Decreased frequency of increased voiding

    The effectiveness of the treatment is evaluated based on the daily voiding frequency post-treatment compared to the daily voiding frequency pre-treatment. The expected outcome is a reduction in the frequency of increased voiding.

    Time frame: Change from baseline positive response rate at the 4th week after the treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency of voiding

    The frequency of voiding used will be calculated from the patient's 3-day voiding frequency.

    Time frame: Change from baseline Frequency of voiding, nocturia, number of pads at the 4th week after the treatment

  2. The Quality of Life

    The Quality of Life-Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ7) will be used to assess specific QoL related to incontinence

    Time frame: Change from baseline the Quality of Life at the 4th week after the treatment

  3. Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (ADL)

    The Barthel Index assesses activities of daily living (ADLs), documenting what a patient does daily without determining capabilities. The 10 items to score are: feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toileting, chair transfer, ambulation, and stair climbing. Scores reflect independence, with lower scores indicating less independence. A score above 60 typically denotes independence.

    Time frame: Change from baseline Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living at the 4th week after the treatment

  4. The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS)

    OABSS (Overactive Bladder Symptom Score), four questions assessing daytime frequency (OABSS-1), nocturia frequency (OABSS-2), urgency frequency (OABSS-3), and urgency urinary incontinence (OABSS-4). Severity is rated on a Likert scale from 0-2, 0-3, 0-5, and 0-5, respectively. The total score ranges from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Change from baseline The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score at the 4th week after the treatment

  5. Treatment Satisfaction Level

    At the end of the treatment, participants will be asked to evaluate their satisfaction level with the administered treatment using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (5=very satisfied, 4=satisfied, 3=neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 2=dissatisfied, 1=very dissatisfied).

    Time frame: Change from baseline Treatment Satisfaction Level at the 4th week after the treatment

  6. Cystometric value

    Cystometric value are useful in defining the voiding characteristics of patients.

    Time frame: Change from baseline Cystometric value at the 4th week after the treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pamukkale University
    Denizli, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Thomas LH, Watkins CL, French B, Sutton C, Forshaw D, Cheater F, Roe B, Leathley MJ, Burton C, McColl E, Booth J; ICONS Project Team; ICONS Patient, Public and Carer Involvement Group. Study protocol: ICONS: identifying continence options after stroke: a randomised trial. Trials. 2011 May 20;12:131. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-131. PubMed 21599945 ↗
  • Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Natural history and effects on 2-year outcomes of urinary incontinence after stroke. Stroke. 2001 Jan;32(1):122-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.1.122. PubMed 11136926 ↗
  • Gross T, Schneider MP, Bachmann LM, Blok BF, Groen J, Hoen LA, Castro-Diaz D, Padilla Fernandez B, Del Popolo G, Musco S, Hamid R, Ecclestone H, Karsenty G, Phe V, Pannek J, Kessler TM. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Treating Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 29. PubMed 26831506 ↗
  • Parittotokkaporn S, Varghese C, O'Grady G, Svirskis D, Subramanian S, O'Carroll SJ. Non-invasive neuromodulation for bowel, bladder and sexual restoration following spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;194:105822. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105822. Epub 2020 Apr 12. PubMed 32334284 ↗
  • Hagerty JA, Richards I, Kaplan WE. Intravesical electrotherapy for neurogenic bladder dysfunction: a 22-year experience. J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 2):1680-3; discussion 1683. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.188. Epub 2007 Aug 17. PubMed 17707024 ↗
  • Nardone R, Versace V, Sebastianelli L, Brigo F, Golaszewski S, Christova M, Saltuari L, Trinka E. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and bladder function: A systematic review. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Nov;130(11):2032-2037. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.08.020. Epub 2019 Sep 3. PubMed 31541980 ↗
  • Araujo TG, Schmidt AP, Sanches PRS, Silva Junior DP, Rieder CRM, Ramos JGL. Transcutaneous tibial nerve home stimulation for overactive bladder in women with Parkinson's disease: A randomized clinical trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Jan;40(1):538-548. doi: 10.1002/nau.24595. Epub 2020 Dec 16. PubMed 33326648 ↗
  • Perissinotto MC, D'Ancona CA, Lucio A, Campos RM, Abreu A. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms and its impact on health-related quality of life in patients with Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2015 Jan-Feb;42(1):94-9. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000078. PubMed 25549314 ↗
  • Gaspard L, Tombal B, Opsomer RJ, Castille Y, Van Pesch V, Detrembleur C. [Physiotherapy and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients: a randomized controlled trial]. Prog Urol. 2014 Sep;24(11):697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 19. French. PubMed 25214451 ↗
  • Zonic-Imamovic M, Imamovic S, Cickusic A, Delalic A, Hodzic R, Imamovic M. Effects of Treating an Overactive Urinary Bladder in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Acta Med Acad. 2019 Dec;48(3):271-277. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.267. PubMed 32124625 ↗
  • Eftekhar T, Teimoory N, Miri E, Nikfallah A, Naeimi M, Ghajarzadeh M. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation for treating neurologic bladder in women: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Med Iran. 2014;52(11):816-21. PubMed 25415813 ↗
  • Monteiro ES, de Carvalho LB, Fukujima MM, Lora MI, do Prado GF. Electrical stimulation of the posterior tibialis nerve improves symptoms of poststroke neurogenic overactive bladder in men: a randomized controlled trial. Urology. 2014 Sep;84(3):509-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.031. PubMed 25168524 ↗
  • Liu Y, Xu G, Luo M, Teng HF. Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation at Two Frequencies on Urinary Incontinence in Poststroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Mar;95(3):183-93. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000360. PubMed 26259053 ↗
  • Erden E, Ersoz M, Erden E, Tiftik T. Urodynamic findings and therapeutic approaches for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with thoracic spinal cord injury. Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Oct;192(5):2513-2520. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03239-9. Epub 2022 Dec 1. PubMed 36454536 ↗
  • Booth J, Hagen S, McClurg D, Norton C, MacInnes C, Collins B, Donaldson C, Tolson D. A feasibility study of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for bladder and bowel dysfunction in elderly adults in residential care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Apr;14(4):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.10.021. Epub 2012 Nov 30. PubMed 23206722 ↗
  • Schreiner L, dos Santos TG, Knorst MR, da Silva Filho IG. Randomized trial of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation to treat urge urinary incontinence in older women. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Sep;21(9):1065-70. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1165-6. Epub 2010 May 11. PubMed 20458465 ↗
  • Ozerdogan N, Beji NK, Yalcin O. Urinary incontinence: its prevalence, risk factors and effects on the quality of life of women living in a region of Turkey. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2004;58(3):145-50. doi: 10.1159/000079422. Epub 2004 Jun 29. PubMed 15237249 ↗
  • Kucukdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Tennant A, Suldur N, Sonel B, Arasil T. Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey. Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000 Jun;32(2):87-92. PubMed 10853723 ↗
  • Culha MG, Degirmentepe RB, Ozbir S, Cakir SS, Homma Y. Turkish validation of the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) and evaluation of mirabegron treatment response. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Dec;30(12):2121-2126. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04054-0. Epub 2019 Jul 22. PubMed 31332467 ↗
  • Kim SJ, Choi HW, Cho HJ, Hwang TK, Kim JC. The influence of preoperative bladder outlet obstruction on continence and satisfaction in patients with stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling. Int Neurourol J. 2010 Dec;14(4):267-71. doi: 10.5213/inj.2010.14.4.267. Epub 2010 Dec 31. PubMed 21253340 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06385769
Lead sponsor
Pamukkale University
Responsible party
Necmettin Yildiz (Professor Doctor, Pamukkale University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 26, 2024
Start date
Apr 22, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 26, 2024

Study contacts

Emre Bezmez, M.D.
Contact
emrebezmez@gmail.com
+905319902220
Necmettin Yıldız, Prof.
study director · Pamukkale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion