CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06367816BRAVEUpdated Mar 10, 2026

Brain Recovery With Automated VEntilation

An observational study in Brain Injuries, Acute, Respiration, Artificial and Automation, sponsored by University of Genova. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 105 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-10.

Sponsored by University of Genova · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 105 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Thus far, the closed-loop ventilation mode INTELLiVENT-ASV has been extensively tested in various groups of critically ill patients, and has been shown to be effective and safe in various groups of ventilated patients, including those at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), patients with ARDS, and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Some of these studies included acute brain injury (ABI) patients, but the effectiveness, efficacy and safety of INTELLiVENT-ASV has never been thoroughly tested in these patients. The current study will investigate the effectiveness in providing both brain- and lung protective ventilation, the safety and the efficacy of a closed-loop ventilation mode (INTELLiVENT-ASV) in acute brain injury patients, using breath-by-breath data.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Closed-loop ventilation has been proven effective in lung-protective ventilation but its effectiveness, safety and efficacy in providing both lung- and brain-protective ventilation in patients with acute brain injury has not been investigated.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness, efficacy and safety of INTELLiVENT-ASV with respect to brain- and lung-protective ventilation in ABI patients

Hypothesis: We hypothesize that INTELLiVENT-ASV is effective with regard to brain- and lung-protective ventilation (that is achieving brain- and lung- protective targets), efficacious (that is improving outcomes), and that INTELLiVENT-ASV is safe in invasively ventilated ABI patients.

Study design: Single-center, crossover trial.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, breath-by-breath ventilation data will be available from before and after the switch to closed-loop ventilation with INTELLiVENT-ASV, wherein the decision to switch is determined by the attending healthcare worker, i.e., not protocolized and only for clinical/organizational reasons. High granular data are collected both before and after this switch, limited to three hours for conventional and three hours for closed-loop ventilation. Neuromonitoring is part of current clinical practice and data will be collected only when available.

Study population: Invasively ventilated patients diagnosed with acute brain injury Methods: When the ventilator is switched upon the caregivers decision, data will be collected from three hours before the switch and three hours after the switch.

Study endpoints: The primary composite endpoint is the proportion of breaths and proportion of time within predefined zones of ventilation (based on VT and airway pressures, saturation of peripheral O2 (SpO2) and end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2).

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Injuries, Acute
  • Respiration, Artificial
  • Automation
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 100 across 690 observational studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Genova is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 105 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Invasively ventilated acute brain injury (ABI) patients admitted to the ICU of the Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genova, Italy

Inclusion criteria

  • aged ≥ 18 years;
  • intubated and receiving invasive ventilation for ABI;
  • admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- receiving ventilation with a ventilator that does not allow INTELLiVENT-ASV

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • ProcedureINTELLiVENT

    Closed-loop mode of ventilation

  • ProcedureConventional ventilation

    Mode of ventilation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of breaths in predefined zones of ventilation

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  2. Proportion of time in predefined zones of ventilation

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intracerebral changes assessed by multimodal neuromonitoring available

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  2. Changes on Electrical Impedence Tomography when available

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  3. Effectiveness in primary ABI patients vs non primary ABI patients

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  4. Episodes and time of high maximum airway pressure

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  5. Episodes and time of high respiratory rate

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  6. Incidence of severe hypoxemia

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  7. Incidence of severe hypercapnia

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  8. Discontinuation of ventilatory mode (yes or no)

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  9. Percentage of breaths in the predefined 'critical' ventilation zone

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  10. Incidence of pneumothorax

    Time frame: 8 hours from baseline

  11. Efficacy on glascow coma scale

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  12. Duration of ventilation in survivors

    Time frame: 90 days

  13. Ventilator free days

    Time frame: 90 days

  14. Intensive care unit length of stay

    Time frame: 90 days

  15. Hospital length of stay

    Time frame: 90 days

  16. 28-day mortality

    Time frame: 90 days

  17. 90-day mortality

    Time frame: 90 days

  18. Number of alarms

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

  19. Number of manual adjustments

    Time frame: 7 hours from baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UO Clinica Anestesiologica e Terapia Intensiva, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
    Genova, GE 16132, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Goossen RL, Gavinelli S, Dragoni S, van Meenen DMP, Paulus F, Schultz MJ, Ball L, Patroniti NA, Robba C. Brain protective ventilation in acute brain injury patients with use of fully automated ventilation (BRAVE): A cross-over clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2026 Mar 1;43(3):235-244. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002253. Epub 2025 Aug 22. PubMed 40855946 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06367816
Lead sponsor
University of Genova
Responsible party
Lorenzo Ball (Clinical Professor, University of Genova) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 16, 2024
Start date
Apr 11, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Mar 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion