ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06366503Updated Aug 3, 2025

Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Post-Procedure Cream Versus a Comparator in Patients Treated With Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser for Facial Rejuvenation

An interventional study of Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser and Facial Cleanser in Photoaging, Wrinkle and Skin Laxity, sponsored by Revision Skincare. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 35 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-03.

Sponsored by Revision Skincare · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Dec 2023, 2 years 10 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2023, registered Apr 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This randomized, single-center, double-blinded, split-face, controlled clinical trial was conducted to investigate the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of a post-procedure cream when used immediately after fractional ablative CO2 laser treatment and for 14 days post-procedure with three times daily application in healthy female subjects aged 35 to 65 with moderate to severe global facial overall photodamage (score of 4 to 9 out of the 10-point Modified Griffiths' scale). Furthermore, this clinical trial compared the active post-procedure cream to a comparator anhydrous formulation often paired with skin rejuvenation procedures. This is a cosmetic study with a FDA-regulated device.

A total of 22 healthy female subjects completed the study.

Read the detailed description

This randomized, single-center, double-blinded, split-face, controlled clinical trial was conducted to investigate the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of a post-procedure cream when used immediately after fractional ablative CO2 laser treatment and for 14 days post-procedure with three times daily application in healthy female subjects aged 35 to 65 with moderate to severe global facial overall photodamage (score of 4 to 9 out of the 10-point Modified Griffiths' scale). The ability of the post-procedure cream to soothe skin and improve patient downtime post-procedure was investigated by evaluating tolerability parameters (erythema, edema, dryness, burning, itching, stinging) and pain over the course of the study. Furthermore, this clinical trial compared the active post-procedure cream to a comparator anhydrous formulation often paired with skin rejuvenation procedures.

A 14-day washout period was required of all subjects prior to CO2 laser treatment. Tolerability (investigator: erythema, edema, dryness; subject: burning, itching, stinging) and safety were assessed through grading at screening, pre-procedure, post-procedure, post-procedure/post-product application, and days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 post-procedure. Pain evaluations were completed by subjects using the 11-point Wong Baker Faces® Pain Rating scale post-procedure, post-procedure/post-product application, and days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 post-procedure.

In addition, efficacy evaluation using the Modified Griffiths' scale was performed at screening, pre-procedure, and days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 post-procedure. Self-assessment questionnaires were completed by subjects post-procedure/post-product application and days 1, 3, and 14 post-procedure. Clinical photography was completed at all timepoints (screening to day 14 post-procedure).

A total of 22 subjects completed study participation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Photoaging
  • Wrinkle
  • Skin Laxity

Keywords

  • post-procedure
  • Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Revision Skincare is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy female subjects 35-65 years of age
  • Fitzpatrick Skin Type I to III
  • Any race or ethnicity
  • Moderate to Severe Overall Photodamage (global face) (score of 4 to 9 out of the 10-point Modified Griffiths' scale, where 0 = none and 9 = severe)
  • No known medical conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, may interfere with study participation.
  • Willing to discontinue all active topical facial products and only use the assigned test products for the duration of the study.
  • Female subjects of must be willing to use a form of during the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nursing, pregnant, or planning a pregnancy during this study.
  • Having undergone a chemical peel, microdermabrasion, hydro dermabrasion or anti-aging facial within 1 month; non-ablative laser (including IPL) or non-ablative fractional laser resurfacing of the face within 6 months; ablative laser resurfacing of the face within 12 months.
  • Not willing to discontinue active topical facial products for 14 days prior to the Baseline Visit
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Split-Face Application of Active (Experimental)

    Active (Experimental) Post-Procedure Cream Dosage Form: reverse emulsion (water in oil) cream containing bioactive ingredients, botanical actives, peptides, and antioxidants. Frequency of Dosage: Three times daily (morning, afternoon, and evening). Subjects were asked to apply face (including upper eyelid), jawline, and neck. The product was labelled with Right or Left depending on split-face randomization. Study duration: 28 days. Active Post-Procedure Cream duration 14-days.

    Procedure: Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser · Other: Facial Cleanser · Other: Facial Moisturizer · Other: Sunscreen

  • Active comparator
    Split-Face Application of Comparator

    COMPARATOR: Dosage Form: anhydrous formulation. Comparator Anhydrous Formulation Frequency of Dosage: Three times daily (morning, afternoon, and evening). Subjects were asked to apply on the face (including upper eyelid), jawline, and neck. The product was labelled with Right or Left depending on split-face randomization. Study duration: 28 days. Comparator duration 14-days.

    Procedure: Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser · Other: Facial Cleanser · Other: Facial Moisturizer · Other: Sunscreen · Other: Basic Ointment

Interventions

  • ProcedureFractional Ablative CO2 Laser

    A fractional ablative DEKA SmartXide Tetra CO2 laser treatment was performed after a 14-day washout period. Subjects were numbed for 1 hour prior to procedure with topical numbing cream (lidocaine 23%, tetracaine 7%). The global face was treated with a single pass. Treatment parameters include power 20 W, spacing 500 um (13% density), Dwell time 1200 us DEKA pulse mode, spray mode on.

    Also known as: DEKA SmartXide Tetra CO2 laser treatment

  • OtherFacial Cleanser

    Facial cleanser was to be used by subjects twice daily during the 14-day washout period and three times daily during the 14-day post-procedure timeline.

    Also known as: Gentle Foaming Cleanser, Revision Skincare

  • OtherFacial Moisturizer

    A bland facial moisturizer was to be used by subjects twice daily during the 14-day washout period and three times daily between day 3 and 14 post-procedure. Two pumps were to be applied to the face (avoiding the upper eyelid) after applying the active and comparator.

  • OtherSunscreen

    During the 14-day washout period, a bland sunscreen was to be used by subjects in the morning after cleansing and facial moisturizer application with reapplications as needed throughout the day per FDA recommendations. For days 3-14 post-procedure, the bland sunscreen was to be used daily by subjects in the morning and afternoon after cleansing, split-face application of the active post-procedure cream and comparator anhydrous formulation, and facial moisturizer application.

    Also known as: Neutrogena Sheer Zinc SPF 50

  • OtherBasic Ointment

    The basic ointment was used only on the comparator side for three days (72 hours) post-procedure. This was a requirement of the comparator anhydrous formulation.

    Also known as: Vanicream Moisturizing Ointment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Investigator Tolerability

    The primary tolerability endpoint will be Investigator Tolerability Assessment of erythema, edema, and dryness. A change in score or lack of significant change post product application, Day 1 (24 hours), Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, and Day 14 in comparison to baseline (immediately post-procedure) indicates tolerability / safety of the test material. A four-point scale will be used with a lower score indicating a better outcome: 0 = None 1. = Mild 2. = Moderate 3. = Severe

    Time frame: 14 days

  2. Incidence of Adverse Events

    The primary safety endpoint will be determined by the incidence and severity of adverse events in healthy subjects, including immediately post-procedure and throughout the length of the study.

    Time frame: 14-days

  3. Subject Tolerability

    The subject tolerability endpoint will be Subject Tolerability Assessment of burning, itching, and stinging. A change in score or lack of significant change post product application, Day 1 (24 hours), Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, and Day 14 in comparison to baseline (immediately post-procedure) indicates tolerability / safety of the test material. A four-point scale will be used with a lower score indicating a better outcome: 0 = None 1. = Mild 2. = Moderate 3. = Severe

    Time frame: 14 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-Assessment Questionnaire

    A change in response values at Day 1 (24 hours), Day 3, and Day 14 compared to post-procedure/post-product application response values indicates an improvement. Baseline responses will be set to post-procedure/post-product application. Subjects are asked to rate based on a scoring system of the following: from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement / question being asked.

    Time frame: 14 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Dermatology Group
    Blue Ash, Ohio 45242, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Weir NM, Burns AJ, Kononov T, Zahr AS. A Novel Neurocosmetic Postprocedure Cream for Optimal Recovery and Tolerability From Energy-Based Devices. Lasers Surg Med. 2025 Dec;57(10):788-798. doi: 10.1002/lsm.70078. Epub 2025 Nov 24. PubMed 41286587 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06366503
Lead sponsor
Revision Skincare
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 16, 2024
Start date
Oct 3, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 29, 2023
Completion
Dec 29, 2023
Last update
Aug 3, 2025

Study contacts

Nathan Weir, MD, PhD
principal investigator · The Dermatology Group

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion