ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07879456Updated Oct 16, 2026

Enhancing the Durability of Thread-Assisted Brow Suspension Through Upper Blepharoplasty-Assisted Ligament Release

An interventional study of Upper Blepharoplasty and Barbed Thread Brow Suspension in Brow Ptosis, Dermatochalasis and Periorbital Aging, sponsored by Muhammed Mustafa Demirok. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Muhammed Mustafa Demirok · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 16, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
20 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective clinical study aims to investigate whether combining upper blepharoplasty with limited release of the lateral brow-retaining ligaments improves the long-term effectiveness of barbed thread brow suspension.

Lateral eyebrow drooping can contribute to an aged or tired appearance around the eyes. Although thread-based brow lifting can improve eyebrow position, the lifting effect may decrease over time. The researchers aim to determine whether releasing the tissue attachments that restrict eyebrow movement can help maintain the lifting effect.

The study plans to enroll 90 adults aged 20-70 years, divided into three groups of approximately 30 participants each:

  1. Standard upper blepharoplasty alone.
  2. Standard barbed thread brow suspension alone.
  3. Upper blepharoplasty combined with lateral retaining ligament release and barbed thread brow suspension.

Treatment selection will be based on each participant's anatomical characteristics and clinical indications, without random assignment.

Participants will be evaluated before surgery and at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Standardized photographs will be analyzed to measure changes in lateral eyebrow height. Eyebrow symmetry, complications, adverse events, and the need for revision surgery will also be assessed.

The study aims to determine whether the combined surgical approach provides more durable lateral brow elevation without increasing postoperative complications.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-center, controlled, non-randomized, three-group comparative clinical study designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a hybrid surgical technique for lateral brow elevation.

**Background**

Lateral brow ptosis and age-related periorbital soft-tissue changes are common aesthetic concerns. Barbed thread suspension provides a minimally invasive method of brow elevation; however, the durability of its lifting effect may be limited by resistance from the lateral brow-retaining ligaments and surrounding soft-tissue attachments.

Limited release of these attachments through an upper blepharoplasty incision may facilitate superior mobilization of the lateral eyebrow and improve the long-term effectiveness of thread suspension.

**Study Objective**

The primary objective is to compare the durability of lateral brow elevation achieved with upper blepharoplasty-assisted lateral retaining ligament release combined with barbed thread suspension against standard barbed thread suspension alone.

Secondary objectives include assessing eyebrow symmetry, postoperative complications, adverse events, and the need for revision surgery.

**Study Population and Design**

The study will be conducted at Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

A total of 90 adults aged 20-70 years with lateral brow ptosis, eyebrow descent, or age-related periorbital soft-tissue changes are planned for enrollment.

Participants will be allocated to three treatment groups according to clinical examination findings, anatomical characteristics, and treatment requirements. No randomization will be performed.

**Treatment Groups**

Group 1: Standard Upper Blepharoplasty

Participants will undergo conventional upper blepharoplasty without an additional brow-elevating procedure.

Group 2: Standard Barbed Thread Brow Suspension

Participants will undergo lateral brow suspension using CE-marked, double-needle, barbed poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) (PLACL) threads, without surgical release of the lateral retaining ligaments.

Group 3: Hybrid Brow Elevation

Participants will undergo upper blepharoplasty with limited release of the lateral retaining ligaments and associated soft-tissue attachments, followed by lateral brow suspension using barbed PLACL threads.

**Follow-up and Outcome Assessment**

All participants will undergo standardized clinical and photographic evaluations at baseline and at postoperative week 1 and months 1, 3, 6, and 12.

The primary outcome is the change in lateral eyebrow height at 12 months compared with baseline, assessed using standardized digital photogrammetry and ImageJ software.

Secondary outcomes include changes in right and left lateral brow height, eyebrow symmetry, early and late postoperative complications, treatment-related adverse events, and the requirement for revision procedures.

**Study Hypothesis**

The investigators hypothesize that limited lateral retaining ligament release combined with barbed thread suspension will provide more sustained lateral brow elevation than standard thread suspension alone, without a clinically significant increase in complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brow Ptosis
  • Dermatochalasis
  • Periorbital Aging

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Thread Suspension
  • Upper Blepharoplasty
  • PLACL Threads
  • Brow Lift
  • Hybrid Brow Lift
03

In context

Cutis Laxa

151 studies on the registry are indexed under Cutis Laxa; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 30 across 133 interventional studies indexed under Cutis Laxa.

Browse Cutis Laxa studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Muhammed Mustafa Demirok as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

**Inclusion Criteria:**

  • Adults aged 20 to 70 years.
  • Patients presenting to the Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Department for upper blepharoplasty, brow elevation, or periorbital rejuvenation.
  • Presence of at least one of the following clinical findings: upper eyelid dermatochalasis, lateral brow ptosis, eyebrow descent, or age-related periorbital soft-tissue changes.
  • Having received verbal and written information about the study.
  • Provision of written informed consent.
  • Ability and willingness to comply with the planned surgical procedure and postoperative follow-up visits.
  • Willingness to undergo standardized preoperative and postoperative clinical photography.

**Exclusion Criteria:**

  • History of previous brow-lifting surgery.
  • History of surgery involving the forehead, temporal region, upper eyelid, or periorbital area that may affect study outcomes.
  • Facial paralysis or neuromuscular disorders that may affect eyebrow position.
  • Active local or systemic infection.
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease.
  • Bleeding diathesis or uncontrolled anticoagulant use.
  • Known hypersensitivity to the surgical materials or local anesthetic agents used in the study.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Inability to attend scheduled study follow-up visits regularly.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard Upper Blepharoplasty

    Participants in this arm will undergo standard upper blepharoplasty without an additional brow-elevating procedure. The surgery will involve excision of excess upper eyelid skin, with management of the orbicularis oculi muscle and orbital fat when clinically indicated. No lateral retaining ligament release or barbed thread brow suspension will be performed. Approximately 30 participants are planned for this arm.

    Procedure: Upper Blepharoplasty

  • Active comparator
    Standard Barbed Thread Brow Suspension

    Participants in this arm will undergo lateral brow elevation using CE-marked, double-needle, barbed poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) (PLACL) suspension threads. The procedure will be performed without upper blepharoplasty or surgical release of the lateral brow-retaining ligaments. Approximately 30 participants are planned for this arm.

    Procedure: Barbed Thread Brow Suspension

  • Experimental
    Hybrid Brow Elevation

    Participants in this arm will undergo upper blepharoplasty combined with limited release of the lateral brow-retaining ligaments and associated soft-tissue attachments through the upper eyelid incision. Lateral brow elevation will subsequently be performed using CE-marked, double-needle, barbed PLACL suspension threads. This hybrid approach aims to improve the durability of lateral brow elevation by reducing tissue resistance before thread suspension. Approximately 30 participants are planned for this arm.

    Procedure: Upper Blepharoplasty · Procedure: Barbed Thread Brow Suspension · Procedure: Lateral Brow-Retaining Ligament Release

Interventions

  • ProcedureUpper Blepharoplasty

    Standard upper blepharoplasty involving excision of excess upper eyelid skin, with management of the orbicularis oculi muscle and orbital fat when clinically indicated. In the hybrid treatment arm, the upper blepharoplasty incision also provides access for limited lateral brow-retaining ligament release.

  • ProcedureBarbed Thread Brow Suspension

    Lateral brow suspension using CE-marked, double-needle, barbed poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) (PLACL) threads. The threads are used to elevate and support the lateral eyebrow through fixation to the temporal fascia. The technique is performed either as a standalone brow-lifting procedure or in combination with upper blepharoplasty and lateral retaining ligament release.

  • ProcedureLateral Brow-Retaining Ligament Release

    Limited surgical release of the lateral brow-retaining ligaments and associated soft-tissue attachments through an upper blepharoplasty incision. The procedure is performed to facilitate superior mobilization of the lateral eyebrow and reduce tissue resistance before barbed thread suspension. This intervention is performed exclusively in the hybrid treatment arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Lateral Brow Height From Baseline to 12 Months

    Change in lateral eyebrow height from the preoperative baseline to postoperative month 12, measured using standardized clinical photographs and digital photogrammetric analysis with ImageJ software. Measurements will use consistent anatomical reference points across visits. Changes will be compared among the three treatment groups to evaluate the durability of lateral brow elevation.

    Time frame: Baseline and postoperative month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Right and Left Lateral Brow Height

    Changes in right and left lateral eyebrow height relative to baseline, measured separately using standardized clinical photographs and ImageJ digital photogrammetry. Measurements will be compared across treatment groups and postoperative follow-up visits.

    Time frame: Baseline; postoperative week 1 and months 1, 3, 6, and 12

  2. Change in Eyebrow Symmetry

    Change in eyebrow symmetry assessed by comparing right and left lateral brow heights on standardized clinical photographs using ImageJ software. Interbrow height differences will be evaluated at baseline and during postoperative follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline; postoperative week 1 and months 1, 3, 6, and 12

  3. Incidence of Early and Late Postoperative Complications

    Number and proportion of participants experiencing postoperative complications during the 12-month follow-up period. Early and late complications will be documented through clinical examination and follow-up assessments and compared across treatment groups.

    Time frame: From surgery through postoperative month 12

  4. Incidence of Revision Surgery

    Number and proportion of participants requiring revision surgery related to the initial treatment during the 12-month postoperative follow-up period. Revision requirements will be recorded and compared across the three treatment groups.

    Time frame: From surgery through postoperative month 12

  5. Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events

    Number and proportion of participants experiencing treatment-related adverse events during the 12-month follow-up period. Events will be recorded through postoperative clinical assessments, including their nature and relationship to the surgical intervention.

    Time frame: From surgery through postoperative month 12

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul Medeniyet University, Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital
    Istanbul, Istanbul 34720, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves sensitive clinical information and standardized facial photographs that may pose a risk of participant identification. Data will be maintained confidentially in accordance with the approved study protocol, informed consent, and applicable data protection regulations. Aggregated and de-identified study results will be reported in scientific publications.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Jan 2028, 15 months later.

Of 77 interventional studies with no phase under Cutis Laxa, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 20. This study's planned 15 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 10, 2026
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 27, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jan 31, 2028
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07879456
Lead sponsor
Muhammed Mustafa Demirok
Responsible party
Muhammed Mustafa Demirok (Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Resident, Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcın City Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Oct 27, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Muhammed Mustafa Demirok, MD
Contact
m.mustafademirok@gmail.com
+90 530 899 3773
Muhammed Mustafa Demirok, MD
principal investigator · Istanbul Medeniyet University, Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital
Gülsüm Çebi, MD
study director · Istanbul Medeniyet University, Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion