CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06365398SELECTUpdated Apr 15, 2024

Safety and Efficacy of Low-dose hEparinization in Cerebral Angiography sTudy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Heparin and Heparin Sodium Injection in Cerebral Angiography and Heparinization, sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Completed at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-15.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2018, registered Mar 2024).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose: Systemic heparinization is a widely used technique on digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Heparin, however, is associated with a variety of complications, including hemorrhage, thrombocytopenia, and hematomas. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of micro-dose systemic heparinization or no heparinization on cerebral angiography for cerebrovascular diseases.

Methods: A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study on patients who experienced transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or acute ischemic strokes and underwent DSA is performed. Participants are randomized into three groups: regular-dose systemic heparinization, micro-dose systemic heparinization, and no heparinization. Information on patient demographics, laboratory tests, perioperative complications, and back pain scores is collected. Safety endpoints are defined as cerebral ischemic events and local complications of puncture site. Efficacy endpoints were defined as the recovery of the patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Angiography
  • Heparinization

Keywords

  • cerebral angiography
  • heparin
  • Nursing
  • Ischemic Stroke
  • Safety
  • Efficacy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 346 studies on the registry; 217 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. aged 18-65 years;
  2. suspected cerebrovascular disease, including vascular lesions of the carotid, middle cerebral, anterior cerebral, vertebral, basilar, and posterior cerebral arteries;
  3. Activity of daily living (ADL) score between 85\~100;
  4. normal coagulation function and no prior anticoagulant therapy before DSA;
  5. fully informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. iodine allergy;
  2. hepatic and/or renal insufficiency;
  3. severe hypertension with poor blood pressure control;
  4. hemorrhagic diseases;
  5. hyperlipidemia;
  6. poor glycemic control in diabetes;
  7. pregnancy;
  8. atrial fibrillation;
  9. undergoing interventional treatment simultaneously.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
180 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Regular-dose group

    3000\~5000 Units of normal heparin was injected via the sheath tube in the systemic heparinization (Regular-dose) group. Half a dose of normal heparin is added after the imaging session has lasted more than half an hour.

    Drug: Heparin

  • Experimental
    Micro-dose group

    Micro-dose group is performed with two bags of 500 milliliter(ml) saline with 2500 Units of heparin were used to make a 5000 Units per liter heparin saline, which was used to infuse anticoagulation.

    Drug: Heparin Sodium Injection

  • Experimental
    heparinization group

    No heparinization is performed with no additional heparin is administered by a sheath or arterial route in the third group.

    Other: No heparinization

Interventions

  • DrugHeparin

    As soon as the sheath was inserted, three different doses of heparin were administered according to the patients group assignment. In the conventional systemic heparinization (Regular-dose) group (The drug is Heparin Sodium Injection 2ml:12500 Units per bottle), systemic heparin was administered by intravenous injection at a dose of 83 Units/Kg. Patients in both the regular dose (83 units/kg) and low dose (42 units/kg) groups were given heparin intravenously once before the procedure of cerebral angiography, and no further heparin infusion was given during the angiography procedure. If the duration of the imaging procedure exceeded 1 hour, an additional 1/2 amount of the first dose of heparin was given.

    Also known as: Regular-dose heparinization

  • DrugHeparin Sodium Injection

    In the micro-dose systemic heparinization (Micro-dose) group (the drug is Heparin Sodium Injection 2ml:12500 Units per bottle), systemic heparin was administered by intravenous injection at a dose of 42 Units/Kg. Patients in both the regular dose (83 units/kg) and low dose (42 units/kg) groups were given heparin intravenously once before the procedure of cerebral angiography, and no further heparin infusion was given during the angiography procedure. If the duration of the imaging procedure exceeded 1 hour, an additional 1/2 amount of the first dose of heparin was given.

    Also known as: Micro-dose heparinization

  • OtherNo heparinization

    No additional heparin was administered via the sheath or arterial route in the no heparinization group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative cerebral infarction

    The safety endpoints of the study were postoperative cerebral infarction on imaging, and local complications such as bleeding at the puncture site, subcutaneous hematoma, and pseudoaneurysm diagnosed by computed tomography angiography (CTA). All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging within 48 hours after cerebral angiography to check for new ischemic infarction. Postoperative ischemia was characterized as the abrupt appearance of novel neurological deficits, including hemiplegia, hemianopia, aphasia, dysphagia, sensory impairment, or confusion, persisting for more than 24 hours, accompanied with the presence of newly detected cerebral infarction using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography.

    Time frame: Perioperative period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for back pain

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for back pain is assessed by investigators after intervention

    Time frame: 24 hours after intervention

  2. the incidence of paralysis of surgical limb

    the incidence of paralysis is assessed after intervention

    Time frame: 24 hours after intervention

  3. the incidence of pain of surgical limb

    the incidence of pain of surgical limb is assessed after intervention

    Time frame: 24 hours after intervention

  4. the incidence of postoperative urethral catheterization

    the incidence of postoperative urethral catheterization is assessed after intervention.

    Time frame: 24 hours after intervention

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Beijing, China
  • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University.
    Beijing, 100053, China
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06365398
Lead sponsor
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2024
Start date
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2021
Completion
Jan 1, 2022
Last update
Apr 15, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion