ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06359548Updated Apr 11, 2024

PEELED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE REPOSITION

An interventional study of Peeled ILM Reposition and ILM Peeling in Macular Holes, sponsored by Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-11.

Sponsored by Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Macular hiatus (MH) refers to a tissue defect in the photoreceptor cell layer of the inner boundary membrane of the optic disc in the macular region. Among them, idiopathic macular hiatus (IMH) is more common in people over 60 years old and is a common eye disease. With the aging of society, the number of patients increases, and it severely damages the patients' vision and life quality. Previously, the conventional surgical approach for treating MH was vitrectomy combined with inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Although the closure rate of MH is high, many damages to the morphology and function of the ILM peeled area have been found. Our team firstly report a novel technique of peeled ILM reposition. Compared to traditional ILM peeling, the novel technique peeled ILM reposition maintains the integrity of internal retina by "pull" back the ILM flap. The previous pilot clinical study suggests that the novel technique peeled ILM reposition surgical intervention can achieve better morphology and functional prognosis. However, there is currently a lack of larger sample size prospective randomized controlled studies to further clarify the clinical efficacy of this new surgical technique in treating IMH. This study aims to conduct a single center, prospective, and randomized controlled study, combined with previous work, to analyze the efficacy of this novel technique peeled ILM peeling in the treatment of IMH. We hypothesize that this novel technique can achieved better morphological and functional prognosis compared to traditional ILM peeling.

02

Conditions studied

  • Macular Holes

Browse trials for

03

In context

Retinal Perforations

139 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinal Perforations; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 50 across 94 interventional studies indexed under Retinal Perforations.

Browse Retinal Perforations studies →

Lead sponsor

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 225 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The patients are diagnosed as MH with a diameter ≤ 600 µm by optical coherence tomography.
  2. Age ranges from 50 to 80 years.
  3. Do not participate in other clinical studies.
  4. Agree to sign an form with good compliance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Traumatic macular hole.
  2. Combined with serious epiretinal membrane.
  3. Combined with diabetic retinopathy, hypertensive retinopathy.
  4. Combined with other ocular diseases, such as keratitis,uveitis,retinal vasculitis.
  5. Spherical equivalent ≥ -6.0 diopters or axial length ≥ 26 mm.
  6. History of intraocular surgery.
  7. Presence of staphyloma.
  8. Other ocular diseases that influence macular microstructure or visual function.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Reposition Group

    Peeled ILM Reposition

    Procedure: Peeled ILM Reposition

  • Active comparator
    Peeling Group

    ILM Peeling

    Procedure: ILM Peeling

Interventions

  • ProcedurePeeled ILM Reposition

    The ILM was stained using 0.1 mL of indocyanine green(ICG) for approximately 1minute after PPV. The ILM was grasped with end gripping forceps (Grieshaber Maxgrip 723.13; Alcon Laboratories Inc) at a point away from the center of MH around one disc diameter in inferior quadrant of macular area. First, a horizontal ILM strip was peeled off with a width approximately 1.5 to 2.5 disc diameter. Then, the edge of the horizontal ILM strip was grasped and peeled from inferior to superior area continuously.Then the "ILM roll" was flattened back to peeled area assisted with approximately 1.0 mL of PFO (Perfluoron, Alcon Laboratories, Inc). The position of the fixed ILM flap was adjusted under PFO bubble using flute needle or forceps if required.

    Also known as: ILM Flap reposition, ILM Flap covering

  • ProcedureILM Peeling

    The ILM was stained using 0.1 mL of indocyanine green(ICG) for approximately 1minute after PPV. The ILM was grasped with end gripping forceps (Grieshaber Maxgrip 723.13; Alcon Laboratories Inc). The strand of ILM was peeled off radially from the foveal center to the vascular arcade. As a result, a round-shaped, 2.5-disk diameter to 3.5-disk diameter ILM-peeled area was created.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to 6 months postoperatively

    The change of BCVA from baseline to 6-month postoperatively

    Time frame: Pre-operatively, 1-month postoperatively, 3-month postoperatively, 6-month postoperatively,

Secondary outcomes

  1. The MH closure rate

    The MH closure rate at 1-month postoperatively

    Time frame: 1-month postoperatively

  2. The range of inner retinal dimpling

    The range of inner retinal dimpling was measured by OCT (RTVueXR Avanti; Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA)

    Time frame: 1-month postoperatively, 3-month postoperatively, 6-month postoperatively,

  3. Postoperative retinal thickness

    With the Thickness Map protocol of the OCT, the full retinal thickness (from ILM to retinal pigment epithelium), inner retinal thickness (from ILM to inner plexiform layer (IPL)), and outer retinal thickness (from IPL to retinal pigment epithelium) of the fovea, parafovea, and perifovea were recorded, respectively.

    Time frame: Pre-operatively, 1-month postoperatively, 3-month postoperatively, 6-month postoperatively,

  4. The fixation stability and sensitivity threshold

    Measured by microperimetry (MAIA, CenterVue, Italy)

    Time frame: Pre-operatively, 3-month postoperatively, 6-month postoperatively,

  5. mfERG P1 wave density amplitudes

    Measured by multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG, Espion, Diagnosys LLC, Cambridge, United Kingdom)

    Time frame: Pre-operatively, 3-month postoperatively, 6-month postoperatively,

  6. M-score values

    Metamorphopsia score (M-score) measurement was performed using the M-chart (Inami Co, Tokyo, Japan)

    Time frame: Pre-operatively, 1-month postoperatively, 3-month postoperatively, 6-month postoperatively,

  7. NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire scores

    The scores obtain from National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire)

    Time frame: Pre-operatively, 1-month postoperatively, 3-month postoperatively, 6-month postoperatively,

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University Medicine School
    Shanghai, China
    Recruiting
    • Tian Tian, Dr. · Contact
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2024; primary completion for Jun 2026, 26 months later.

Of 45 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Retinal Perforations, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 26 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 45 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 29, 2024
First posted
Apr 11, 2024
StartEst.
Apr 15, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 2026
Last update
Apr 11, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06359548
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 11, 2024
Start date
Apr 15, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 11, 2024

Study contacts

Tian Tian, MD,PhD
Contact
tiantianoph@163.com
+8615216695095
Tian Tian, MD,PhD
principal investigator · Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion