ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06359431Updated Sep 14, 2026

A Novel Smart Speculum Versus a Standard Speculum for Easy Visualisation of the Cervix and Performing Remote Cervical Cancer Screening

An interventional study of Novel Smart Speculum and Standard speculum in Cervical Cancer, sponsored by GICMED. Completed at 1 site in Cameroon. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 49 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by GICMED · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
81
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 49 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Objective: The main objective of this study is to verify the level of comfort for patients and the degree of cervical visibility for health providers using a novel smart speculum compared to the standard speculum. In addition, establish the feasibility of using this novel smart speculum device with telemedicine for cervical cancer screening in a low-resource setting using VIA compared to the standard of care.

Study sites: The study will be carried out in six health facilities in the centre region of Cameroon.

Study Period: The study is expected to take 11 months; 4 months for protocol development and approval, 4 months for the training and implementation phase with data collection, 3 months for data analysis, reporting writing and dissemination.

Study design: The study will be a multicentre, randomised control single blind trial. Patient participation will be a single study visit. Eligible subjects, consenting to participate will act as their own controls, and will receive speculum examination and cervical cancer screening with both the novel speculum and a traditional speculum. The order of usage of the specula will be randomised, and the women will be blinded on knowing which speculum is being used at a particular time. Level of patient comfort will be evaluated using a visual analogue scale, percentage visualisation of the cervix will be determined following insertion of each of the specula, and results of cervical cancer screening following VIA screening method will be compared between the standard of care procedure to that using the novel smart speculum associated to telemedicine.

Patient population: All women between the ages of 21 years and 49 years who come in for consultation.

Enrolment size: 81 women will be enrolled in the study. Study procedure: A speculum examination will be done on the day of consultation. Level of patient comfort determined using a visual analogue scale and proportion of the cervix visualised would be recorded into questionnaires. Cervical cancer screening through VIA will be performed with results confirmed on site by the clinician using the standard speculum, while two other clinicians for each case will do a remote diagnosis after reviewing images captured through the novel speculum device and forwarded to them through telemedicine. The remote clinicians will be blinded on the diagnosis proposed by the clinician on site.

Primary endpoints: The proportion of clinicians with easy visualisation of the cervix with the 2 specula, level of patient comfort with the novel smart speculum compared to the Standard of care speculum (traditional speculum), reliability of the speculum in carrying out cervical cancer screening using telemedicine.

Ethical considerations: The protocol will be submitted for the approval of the National Human Health Research Committee. Written informed consent will be sought for all participants before enrolment into the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Cancer
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

2,366 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 677 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 81 is below the median of 100 across 1,738 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with GICMED as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 49 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All women aged between 21 to 49 years who will consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who have previously been diagnosed with and/or treated for cervical pre- cancer and cancer with surgical removal of part of the cervix will be excluded.
  • Women in the menstrual periods, vulvar atrophy, interstitial cystitis, chronic pelvic pain, vestibulodynia, vaginitis or menopausal.
  • Women who have never had any sexual intercourse before (virgins).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
81 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard Speculum/Novel Speculum

    In this arm, the standard speculum will be administered before the novel speculum

    Device: Novel Smart Speculum · Device: Standard speculum

  • Active comparator
    Novel Speculum/Standard Speculum

    In this arm, the novel speculum will be administered before the standard speculum

    Device: Novel Smart Speculum · Device: Standard speculum

Interventions

  • DeviceNovel Smart Speculum

    The examiner will lubricate the intended speculum with a water-based lubricant then insert through the vagina. Immediately after the first speculum is inserted, and before the examiner attempts to expand the blades to visualize the cervix, the participant's comfort will be assessed using a modified version of the 0-10 Universal Pain Assessment Tool, which shows a series of faces ranging from happy face at 0, or "no pain", to a crying face at 10, which represents "worst pain possible". Her response will be recorded immediately. Then the examiner will open the speculum adequately to visualise the cervix. At this point, the visual analogue scale will be given to the participant and told to indicate again the level of pain following manipulation of the speculum, using a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable). Her response will be recorded immediately.

  • DeviceStandard speculum

    he examiner will lubricate the intended speculum with a water-based lubricant then insert through the vagina. Immediately after the first speculum is inserted, and before the examiner attempts to expand the blades to visualize the cervix, the participant's comfort will be assessed using a modified version of the 0-10 Universal Pain Assessment Tool, which shows a series of faces ranging from happy face at 0, or "no pain", to a crying face at 10, which represents "worst pain possible". Her response will be recorded immediately. Then the examiner will open the speculum adequately to visualise the cervix. At this point, the visual analogue scale will be given to the participant and told to indicate again the level of pain following manipulation of the speculum, using a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable). Her response will be recorded immediately.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visualization

    The proportion of clinicians with easy visualisation of the cervix with the 2 specula, level of patient comfort for the novel smart speculum compared to the standard of care speculum,

    Time frame: Up to 4 months

  2. Reliability in cervical cancer screening using a questionnaire

    reliability of the speculum in carrying out cervical cancer screening using telemedicine

    Time frame: Up to 4 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CASS Nkoldongo
    Yaoundé, Centre Region, Cameroon
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06359431
Lead sponsor
GICMED
Responsible party
Fai Karl Gwei Njuwa (Medical Epidemiologist, GICMED) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 11, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2024
Completion
Sep 30, 2024
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion