ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT06351553EASy-PULSE AFUpdated Apr 8, 2024

Effect of the Autonomic Nervous System on the Outcomes of PULSEd Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation

An interventional study of Pulmonary vein isolation exclusively with radiofrequency and Pulmonary vein isolation exclusively with pulsed field ablation in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Hospital General Universitario de Alicante. Status unknown at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-08.

Sponsored by Hospital General Universitario de Alicante · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2024), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
156
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is considered the therapeutic strategy of choice to maintain sinus rhythm (SR) in symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The most commonly used energy modality is radiofrequency (RF). However, this type of energy presents notable challenges, such as its lack of selectivity for myocardial tissue, which increases the risk of serious complications such as atrioesophageal fistula, PV stenosis, and vagus nerve injuries. In this context, PV isolation using pulsed field ablation (PFA) emerges as a promising alternative due to its greater myocardial selectivity. However, this selectivity presents additional challenges. Preliminary studies indicate that PFA may not damage the autonomic nervous system (ANS) involved in the initiation and maintenance of AF in certain patients, although stronger evidence is needed to support this claim.

The investigators propose to carry out a single-center clinical trial, although with the possibility in the future of including other centers. Patients will be randomized to three research groups: PV isolation with RF, PV isolation with PFA, and PV isolation combining PFA and RF (using RF on the anterior wall and PFA on the posterior wall). This assignment will be open to the operator who performs the procedure, but blind for the researcher responsible for monitoring and for the data analyst. The objective is to compare the impact of different energy sources during PV isolation on the ability to produce a permanent alteration in the ANS. The hypothesis is that combined PF isolation will be capable of producing a permanent alteration of autonomic function parameters superior to ablation using exclusive PFA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Pulmonary Vein Isolation
  • Pulsed Field Ablation
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,957 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 933 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 156 is close to the median of 145 across 2,437 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital General Universitario de Alicante is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Patients with a diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, referred to our center for pulmonary vein isolation, who are willing and able to sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.
  • Patients with previous pulmonary vein isolation procedure.
  • Patients with pacemakers, or with a diagnosis of atrioventricular block or sinus dysfunction.
  • Patients who show their refusal to participate in the registry, or are unable to understand the informed consent.
  • Patients under 18 years of age.
  • Pregnant.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
156 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pulmonary vein isolation exclusively with radiofrequency

    The ablation of the anterior and posterior wall will be performed with radiofrequency.

    Procedure: Pulmonary vein isolation exclusively with radiofrequency

  • Experimental
    Pulmonary vein isolation exclusively with pulsed field ablation

    The ablation of the anterior and posterior wall will be performed with pulsed field ablation.

    Procedure: Pulmonary vein isolation exclusively with pulsed field ablation

  • Experimental
    Combined pulmonary vein isolation

    The ablation of the anterior wall will be performed with radiofrequency, and the posterior wall with pulsed field ablation.

    Procedure: Combined pulmonary vein isolation

Interventions

  • ProcedurePulmonary vein isolation exclusively with radiofrequency

    The QDOT (Biosense Webster, Inc.) or TactiFlex (Abbott S.E.) catheters will be used. The ablation will be controlled by temperature, with a limit of 42ºC and a power target of 30-40W. A high-power strategy (90 W/4 seconds) can be used on the posterior wall when the QDOT catheter is used.

  • ProcedurePulmonary vein isolation exclusively with pulsed field ablation

    The Sphere-9 catheter will be used (with biphasic and unipolar wave), with a duration per application of 5 seconds and a separation between lesions of 5-6mm. The target temperature increase will be at least 1.5ºC above the patient's basal temperature to mark the ablation as effective.

  • ProcedureCombined pulmonary vein isolation

    The Sphere-9 catheter will be used for both radiofrequency and pulsed field ablation. When using radiofrequency, the ablation will be temperature controlled, with a target temperature of 73ºC. The duration per application will be 5 seconds. Catheter irrigation during ablation will be 30ml/min, with a maximum current intensity of 3700mA, and a maximum current density of 13.6mA/mm2. The separation between lesions will be 7-8mm. Regarding pulsed field ablation, the characteristics will be those indicated in "Pulmonary vein isolation exclusively with pulsed field ablation" group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy primary outcome: Alteration of autonomic function parameters

    Determine if combined pulmonary vein isolation (anterior wall ablation with radiofrequency and posterior wall ablation with pulsed field ablation) will be capable of producing a permanent alteration of autonomic function parameters (average heart rate) greater than exclusive pulsed field ablation.

    Time frame: Two years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy secondary outcome: Alteration of autonomic function parameters

    Determine if combined pulmonary vein isolation (anterior wall ablation with radiofrequency and posterior wall ablation with pulsed field ablation) will be capable of producing a permanent alteration of autonomic function parameters (attenuation of heart rate variability) greater than exclusive pulsed field ablation.

    Time frame: Two years

  2. Efficacy secondary outcome: Alteration of autonomic function parameters

    Determine if combined pulmonary vein isolation (anterior wall ablation with radiofrequency and posterior wall ablation with pulsed field ablation) is at least as effective as exclusive radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation in its ability to produce a permanent alteration of autonomic function parameters (average heart rate).

    Time frame: Two years

  3. Efficacy secondary outcome: Alteration of autonomic function parameters

    Determine if combined pulmonary vein isolation (anterior wall ablation with radiofrequency and posterior wall ablation with pulsed field ablation) is at least as effective as exclusive radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation in its ability to produce a permanent alteration of autonomic function parameters (attenuation of heart rate variability).

    Time frame: Two years

  4. Efficacy secondary outcome: Procedure duration.

    Determine if combined pulmonary vein isolation or exclusive pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation will shorten procedure times compared to exclusive radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation.

    Time frame: Two years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Laura García Cano
    Alicante, 03010, Spain
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2024; primary completion for Jun 2026, 24 months later.

Of 789 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 39 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,031 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 54.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 13, 2024
First posted
Apr 8, 2024
StartEst.
Jun 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 2026
Last update
Apr 8, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06351553
Lead sponsor
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Responsible party
Jose Luis Ibañez Criado (Principal Investigator, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 8, 2024
Start date
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion