CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06327828Updated May 16, 2024

Methimazole in Graves' Disease - Comparing the Computer-aided Treatment DigiThy Versus Usual Care

An interventional study of Semi-automated computer-aided treatment (Digital Thyroid, DigiThy) and Usual care in Graves Disease, sponsored by Medical University of Graz. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-16.

Sponsored by Medical University of Graz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two methods of guiding methimazole therapy in patients with Graves' disease: methimazole dose adjustments based on a new semi-automated computer-guided treatment (based on a mathematical model) or based on the treating physician's decision (i.e. usual care). The main question it aims to answer is whether semi-automated computer-guided treatment is not inferior to usual care in terms of safety, the time it takes to achieve euthyroidism and the methimazole dose required.

02

Conditions studied

  • Graves Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Graves Disease

150 studies on the registry are indexed under Graves Disease; 53 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 60 across 92 interventional studies indexed under Graves Disease.

Browse Graves Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Graz is the lead sponsor of 459 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Active Graves' hyperthyroidism [Thyroid-stimulating hormone \<0.1 mU/L, elevated free thyroxine levels (fT4) above the upper limit of normal and positive Thyrotropin receptor antibody (TRAb) according to local laboratory results], measured within the last month prior to the inclusion date
  • Patients not yet receiving antithyroid treatment, or having received antithyroid treatment continuously for less than 4 weeks, or relapse or recurrence of Graves' hyperthyroidism defined as patients previously having received and discontinued treatment with antithyroid drugs for at least 4 weeks)
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment with radioactive iodine
  • Ongoing antithyroid treatment for more than one month
  • Pregnancy
  • Treatment with propylthiouracil
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Semi-automated computer-aided treatment

    Treatment based on the dosing suggestions by a mathematical algorithm and cross-checked by the treating physician

    Device: Semi-automated computer-aided treatment (Digital Thyroid, DigiThy)

  • Active comparator
    Usual care

    Treatment based on the dosing suggestions by the treating physician

    Procedure: Usual care

Interventions

  • DeviceSemi-automated computer-aided treatment (Digital Thyroid, DigiThy)

    Semi-automated computer-aided treatment based on a mathematical model

  • ProcedureUsual care

    Guiding methimazole therapy based on the treating physician's decision

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary aim is to compare semi-automated computer-guided treatment with usual care in terms of their performance indices

    The performance index is the deviation from the desired free thyroxine (fT4) value

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison in terms of cumulative methimazole dosing

    Comparison in terms of cumulative methimazole dosing

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Comparison based on free thyroxine (fT4) target range

    Comparison based on free thyroxine (fT4) target range

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of Graz
    Graz, 8044, Austria
    • Verena Theiler-Schwetz, MD, PhD · Contact
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06327828
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Graz
Collaborators
Graz University of Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 25, 2024
Start date
Sep 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 16, 2024

Study contacts

Verena Theiler-Schwetz, MD, PhD
Contact
verena.schwetz@medunigraz.at
++4331638582383
Stefan Pilz, MD, PhD
Contact
Stefan Pilz, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Medical University of Graz

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion