CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06325423Updated Mar 26, 2024

Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

An observational study in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Carcinoma, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-26.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
50
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bladder cancer (BC) is the 10th most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and the second most common cancer among Egyptian males.

The mainstay of treatment of muscle-invasive BC( MIBC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) or bladder preservation(BP) using maximal transurethral resection of the bladder tumor followed by chemoradiation. The rationale to use NAC before RC or BP is to eradicate micro-metastasis and to downstage the primary tumor.

The 5-year cancer-specific survival for responders to NAC is 90%, in contrast to 30-40% for those not obtaining an objective response. Drawbacks of NAC are disappointing delay of surgery in non-responders and the potential toxicity. So, predictors of response to NAC are necessary to identify patients who may achieve pathologic complete response and will benefit from BP, and the others who may not respond to NAC and spare them NAC toxicity and RC delay.

Tumor microenvironment (TME), including neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and CD8+ T lymphocytes is a promising predictor of response to NAC in MIBC.

NETs are reticulated DNA structures decorated with various protein substances (e.g., histones, myeloperoxidase, neutrophil elastase).NETs are involved in tumor growth, metastasis, and treatment resistance. Moreover, NETs can inhibit T cell responses, thereby promoting tumor growth.

On the other hand, immune cells that are present in the TME play a major role in slowing down tumor progression. CD8+T lymphocytes play a central role in immune-mediated control of cancer . Also, they have been found to be a prognostic tool for advanced BC.

Read the detailed description

Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue specimen of the baseline TUR of MIBC will be obtained from pathology laboratory, Pathology Department, Assiut University.

  • Histological diagnosis of H\&E stained sections will be confirmed.
  • Immunohistochemical staining for Citrullinated histone H3 (H3Cit) antibody as a hallmark of NETs, and CD8 antibody to quantity density of NETs and CD8 expression, then calculate NETs/CD8 ratio.
  • Baseline clinicopathological features of MIBC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be collected from patients' records.
  • Correlation between NETs expression, CD8 expression, NETs/CD8 ratio, and the baseline clinicopathological features with the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • develop a risk score based on the significant predictors of response to identify patients who may achieve pathologic complete response and will benefit from BP, and the others who may not respond to NAC and spare them NAC toxicity and RC delay.
02

Conditions studied

  • Muscle-Invasive Bladder Carcinoma

Keywords

  • MIBC
03

In context

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

1,616 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 421 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 180 across 374 observational studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.

Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients with localised muscle-invasive bladder cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Inclusion criteria

  • Pathologically proven pure urothelial carcinoma, or morphologic variant of urothelial carcinoma.
  • Patients with ≥T2, N0-1, M0, according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System for Bladder Cancer 8th ed., 2017.
  • Patients who received platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy before RC or BP.
  • Available paraffin-embedded TUR specimens for Immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non urothelial carcinoma.
  • Not muscle invasive \< T2.
  • Metastatic bladder cancer.
  • No available paraffin-embedded TUR specimens for IHC.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • MIBC patients who received NAC

    Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy or bladder preservation

    Combination Product: neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Interventions

  • Combination productneoadjuvant chemotherapy

    platinum-based chemotherapy before radical cystectomy or bladder preservation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the expression of NETs and CD8 in paraffin-embedded TUR biopsies

    evaluation of the density of Citrullinated Histone H3 as a hallmark of NETs and the density of CD8 in the baseline FFPE TUR specimens

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. - Response to platinum-based chemotherapy in localized MIBC in relation to: NETs expression, CD8 expression, NET/CD8 ratio and baseline clinicopathological features

    Correlation between NETs expression, CD8 expression, NETs/CD8 ratio and the baseline clinicopathological features of MIBC and the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Local recurrence-free survival (RFS)

    the length of time from radical cystectomy/ bladder preservation to local recurrence.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PubMed 33538338 ↗
  • Skinner DG, Lieskovsky G. Contemporary cystectomy with pelvic node dissection compared to preoperative radiation therapy plus cystectomy in management of invasive bladder cancer. J Urol. 1984 Jun;131(6):1069-72. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50809-5. PubMed 6726903 ↗
  • Rosenblatt R, Sherif A, Rintala E, Wahlqvist R, Ullen A, Nilsson S, Malmstrom PU; Nordic Urothelial Cancer Group. Pathologic downstaging is a surrogate marker for efficacy and increased survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.010. Epub 2011 Dec 13. PubMed 22189383 ↗
  • Jiang DM, Jiang H, Chung PWM, Zlotta AR, Fleshner NE, Bristow RG, Berlin A, Kulkarni GS, Alimohamed NS, Lo G, Sridhar SS. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Before Bladder-Sparing Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Nonmetastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Oct 4. PubMed 30686350 ↗
  • Witjes JA, Comperat E, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Gakis G, Lebret T, Ribal MJ, Van der Heijden AG, Sherif A; European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines. Eur Urol. 2014 Apr;65(4):778-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.046. Epub 2013 Dec 12. PubMed 24373477 ↗
  • Ikarashi D, Kitano S, Tsuyukubo T, Takenouchi K, Nakayama T, Onagi H, Sakaguchi A, Yamashita M, Mizugaki H, Maekawa S, Kato R, Kato Y, Sugai T, Nakatsura T, Obara W. Pretreatment tumour immune microenvironment predicts clinical response and prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting. Br J Cancer. 2022 Mar;126(4):606-614. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01628-y. Epub 2021 Nov 15. PubMed 34782748 ↗
  • Zhao J, Jin J. Neutrophil extracellular traps: New players in cancer research. Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 19;13:937565. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.937565. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36059520 ↗
  • Kaltenmeier C, Yazdani HO, Morder K, Geller DA, Simmons RL, Tohme S. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Promote T Cell Exhaustion in the Tumor Microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 24;12:785222. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.785222. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34899751 ↗
  • Koebel CM, Vermi W, Swann JB, Zerafa N, Rodig SJ, Old LJ, Smyth MJ, Schreiber RD. Adaptive immunity maintains occult cancer in an equilibrium state. Nature. 2007 Dec 6;450(7171):903-7. doi: 10.1038/nature06309. Epub 2007 Nov 18. PubMed 18026089 ↗
  • Durgeau A, Virk Y, Corgnac S, Mami-Chouaib F. Recent Advances in Targeting CD8 T-Cell Immunity for More Effective Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2018 Jan 22;9:14. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00014. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29403496 ↗
  • Hadrup S, Donia M, Thor Straten P. Effector CD4 and CD8 T cells and their role in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron. 2013 Aug;6(2):123-33. doi: 10.1007/s12307-012-0127-6. Epub 2012 Dec 16. PubMed 23242673 ↗
  • Sharma P, Retz M, Siefker-Radtke A, Baron A, Necchi A, Bedke J, Plimack ER, Vaena D, Grimm MO, Bracarda S, Arranz JA, Pal S, Ohyama C, Saci A, Qu X, Lambert A, Krishnan S, Azrilevich A, Galsky MD. Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):312-322. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30065-7. Epub 2017 Jan 26. PubMed 28131785 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06325423
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Gehad Ahmed Abd El-Razik (Assistant Lecturer, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 22, 2024
Start date
Apr 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 26, 2024

Study contacts

Gehad A Abdelrazik, ass.lecturer
Contact
dr.gehadahmed95@gmail.com
01097381211
Hebatullah M Bakri, Lecturer
Contact
heba_bakri@aun.edu.eg
01007272760
Amal R Ibrahim, Ass.Prof
study director · Assiut University
Hanan G Mostafa, Professor
study director · Assiut University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion