CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06320808Updated Nov 10, 2025

Evaluating FDA's Proposed Patient Medication Information Handout

An interventional study of FDA template PMI and Decision Critical PMI in Knowledge and Attitude, sponsored by Carnegie Mellon University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-10.

Sponsored by Carnegie Mellon University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
330
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to assess how useful the proposed one-page FDA-template PMI is to potential users.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

How does the proposed one-page FDA-template PMI compare with the current drug information insert in terms of usefulness and comprehension?

and

How does the proposed one-page FDA-template PMI compare with a revision adding drug benefit information?

Participants will randomized to review one of three patient medication information sheets and then asked questions related to usefulness and comprehension.

Read the detailed description

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed a new one-page 'patient medication information (PMI) handout that can be provided with every prescription medication, in order to provide patients with the information they need to use their medications safely and effectively. The current proposal omits some decision-critical benefit information and had not been tested with potential users, potentially undermining its effectiveness.

The goal of this study is to assess how useful the proposed one-page FDA-template PMI is to potential users, compared with a revision adding drug benefit information and with the current drug information insert.

A randomized trial will be conducted with U.S. female adults 18-45 years, recruited in March, 2024. Participants will complete an online survey after being randomized to view 1 of the 3 information formats. Participants will be paid $10. Surveys are expected to take no more than 30 minutes to complete.

Participants will be randomized to receive either the one-page FDA-template PMI (FDA PMI), a modified template, which added information about drug benefits (Decision Critical PMI), or the existing drug information insert (standard drug information) for the drug, Mifeprex. All individuals will complete knowledge and usability questions and provide demographic information.

The main outcomes measured will be perceived usefulness and comprehension of the patient medication information.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knowledge
  • Attitude

Browse trials for

03

In context

Behavior

371 studies on the registry are indexed under Behavior; 158 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 330 is above the median of 120 across 295 interventional studies indexed under Behavior.

Browse Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Carnegie Mellon University is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • US geographic location
  • 18-45 years of age
  • assigned female sex at birth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<18 years of age
  • > 45 years of age
  • assigned a sex other than female at birth
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
330 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FDA-template PMI

    Patient medication information designed according to FDA template

    Other: FDA template PMI

  • Experimental
    Decision Critical PMI

    Patient medication information designed according to FDA template and modified, according to decision science principles, to include benefit information

    Other: Decision Critical PMI

  • Experimental
    Standard Information

    Standard of care patient medication information

    Other: Standard Information

Interventions

  • OtherFDA template PMI

    Intervention is an information format viewed by participants. The patient medication information format was designed according to a proposed FDA template, which provides information about safe and effective use of a medication. No drug or device is included as part of this intervention.

  • OtherDecision Critical PMI

    Intervention is an information format viewed by participants. The patient medication information format was designed according to a proposed FDA template and modified, according to decision science principles, to include benefit information, which provides information about safe and effective use of a medication. No drug or device is included as part of this intervention.

  • OtherStandard Information

    The intervention is an information format viewed by participants. This patient medication information format is the current standard of care patient medication information that is included with the drug. No drug or device is included as part of this intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Perceived difficulty or ease in reading information

    Single question with a 5-point likert scale response for "How easy or difficult was it to read the medication information guide about \[drug\]?" Minimum score is 1; Maximum score is 5. A higher score represents higher perceived usefulness.

    Time frame: day 1

  2. Perceived usefulness of the medication information guide in making a use decision

    Single question with a 5-point likert scale response for "For someone who had not yet decided to use \[drug\], how useful would the medication information guide be in helping them to make that decision?" Minimum score is 1. Maximum score is 5. A higher score represents higher perceived usefulness.

    Time frame: day 1

  3. Perceived usefulness of the medication information guide in taking the medication properly

    Single question with a 5-point likert scale response for "If someone had decided to use \[drug\], how useful would the medication information guide about \[drug\] be in helping them use the drug properly? " Minimum score is 1. Maximum score is 5. A higher score represents higher perceived usefulness.

    Time frame: day 1

  4. Comprehension

    10 newly-constructed questions designed to measure the comprehension of the following information from the medication information guide: 1) Analysis of condition (1 question) 2) Risks (3 questions) 3)Risk Management (3 questions), and 5) Benefits (3 questions). Participants can score from 0-10 with 10 representing full comprehension of the information and 0 representing no comprehension of the information.

    Time frame: day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Strength of Evidence

    3 questions measuring strength of evidence. One asking about perceived strength of evidence, one about safety, and one about effectiveness of the medication. Each measured on a 5-point likert scale. The question text for each question, respectively, is "how strong is the scientific evidence that \[drug\], when taken correctly, helps patients \[purpose of drug\]?" "how safe is \[drug\], when taken correctly, for \[purpose of drug\]? "how effective is \[drug\], when taken correctly, for \[purpose of drug\]?"

    Time frame: day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Carnegie Mellon University
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06320808
Lead sponsor
Carnegie Mellon University
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh
Responsible party
Baruch Fischhoff (University Professor, Carnegie Mellon University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 20, 2024
Start date
Mar 3, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 4, 2024
Completion
Feb 6, 2025
Last update
Nov 10, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion