ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06311474RAINBOWUpdated Mar 18, 2026

Remote Assessment and Intervention for Behavior Problems in Kids With TSC

An interventional study of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) in Tuberous Sclerosis, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 6 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2022, registered Feb 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
101
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The RAINBOW study is a fully remote study focused on understanding and treating behavior problems in young children with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). The first goal is to enroll a group of 100 children with TSC between the ages of 3 and 6 years old, with and without problem behaviors, to learn about how best to measure behavioral challenges in TSC and how common these behaviors are during this age period. All families will get feedback from the clinical assessments collected. Eligible children who are experiencing behavior problems will be invited to enroll in a pilot clinical trial of internet-based Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (or PCIT), which is meant to help parents better manage their children's challenging behaviors. Adaptations to PCIT are incorporated to suit the needs of TSC children and families. Some participants will be randomly selected to receive the intervention immediately and others after a 6-month delay, but all families will receive the same intervention. Intervention sessions occur on a weekly basis for up to 20 weeks. Follow-up assessments, which include play interactions, parent interviews, and questionnaires occur about 3 and 6 months after the first visit. The delayed treatment group has an extra brief assessment about 12 months from the initial visit. This study will increase what is known about the types of behavior problems that come up during preschool age in TSC and how best to help children and families with TSC who are experiencing these problems.

Read the detailed description

The proposed study uses a telehealth approach to remotely assess and treat behavior problems in preschool-aged children with TSC. This study aims to 1) measure the prevalence and quality of externalizing behavior problems and their relation to family functioning in preschool-aged children with TSC; 2) examine the feasibility and acceptability of internet-based PCIT (I-PCIT) in children with TSC; 3) investigate the effects of I-PCIT on child and parent behavior in preschool-aged children with TSC and behavior problems; and 4) examine predictors of treatment response.

For Aim 1, 100 children with TSC ages 3-6 years old will be enrolled. Developmental abilities and behavior problems will be assessed using norm-referenced parent report measures and video recordings of parent-child interactions. The prevalence of behavior problems in young children with TSC and relation to family functioning will be assessed. A subset of the children from Aim 1 who exhibit elevated externalizing behavior will be recruited for the pilot intervention, with a target sample size of 32. Children will be randomized to an immediate treatment or waitlist control group. Assessments will be performed at baseline (using Aim 1 data), mid-point (3 months later), and post-treatment (6 months later). Families randomized to the waitlist group will have a brief, additional post-treatment assessment 12 months post-baseline). Sessions occur on a weekly basis for up to 20 weeks. Preliminary efficacy will be examined by comparing trajectories from baseline to post-treatment between the immediate treatment and waitlist control groups. Data on feasibility, acceptability, and predictors of treatment response will be studied across all intervention participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberous Sclerosis

Keywords

  • TAND
  • TSC
  • Behavior Problems
  • PCIT
  • TSC-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders
03

In context

Tuberous Sclerosis

115 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberous Sclerosis; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 101 is above the median of 52 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Tuberous Sclerosis.

Browse Tuberous Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,170 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 95 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

For assessment visit:

  • Clinical diagnosis of TSC
  • Chronological age of 3 years, 0 months to 6 years, 11 months old at enrollment.
  • English or Spanish as primary language in the home.

For intervention study only:

  • Elevated behavior problems
  • Parent/caregiver available to participate in PCIT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

For assessment visit:

  • None

For intervention study:

  • Plan for epilepsy surgery during study period
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Waitlist Control

    Participants randomized to the waitlist control (or delayed treatment) condition will receive written and verbal feedback after the baseline assessment visit. These families will participate in follow-up visits at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the baseline visit. They will receive the same treatment (PCIT) after the 6-month assessment.

  • Experimental
    Immediate Treatment

    Participants randomized to the immediate treatment condition will receive written and verbal feedback after the baseline assessment visit. These families will begin PCIT shortly after this visit. These families will participate in follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months after the baseline visit.

    Behavioral: Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT)

Interventions

  • BehavioralParent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT)

    PCIT is a dyadic therapy that focuses on enhancing the parent-child relationship and improving child behavior through positive parenting and limit setting skills. All PCIT sessions are delivered remotely via Zoom once per week for up to 20 weeks. Session length is about 1 hour. There are two distinct phases of PCIT, the Child Directed Interaction and the Parent Directed Interaction. Each phase begins with a Teach session, where parents learn about the skills they will practice during that portion of PCIT, and is followed by Coach sessions, in which the PCIT therapist provides direct feedback and live coaching on the use of the skills. An additional component is Daily Play practice. Parents are instructed to spend five minutes per day playing with their child, during which they practice skills learned during sessions. Adaptations have been made to the standard approach to increase suitability for the TSC population.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI)

    The ECBI is a norm-referenced caregiver report measure of disruptive behavior in children.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up (delayed treatment group only)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Behavior Assessment Scale for Children-3rd Edition (BASC-3)

    The BASC-3 is a norm-referenced caregiver report measure of broad behavior problems and adaptive skills in children.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-month follow-up

  2. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3rd Edition (Vineland-3)

    The Vineland-3 is a norm-referenced caregiver report measure of adaptive skills for infancy through adulthood. Communication, daily living, socialization, and motor skills are measured. The parent interview version is used for this study.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-month follow-up

  3. Parenting Stress Index-4th Edition-Short Form (PSI-4-SF)

    The PSI-4-SF is a norm-referenced self-report measure of parenting-related stress.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-month follow-up

  4. Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS)

    The DPICS measures parent-child interactions across 3 situations: child led play, parent led play, and clean up. Language and behavior are coded according to the DPICS-IV coding system.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up (delayed treatment group only)

  5. Therapy Attitude Index (TAI)

    The TAI measures treatment acceptability in PCIT.

    Time frame: 6-month follow-up (immediate treatment), 12-month follow-up (delayed treatment)

  6. Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)

    The TUQ measures comfort with the use of telehealth methods pre- and post-treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline & 6-month follow-up (immediate treatment), 6-month follow-up & 12-month follow-up (delayed treatment)

  7. Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)

    The ABC is a caregiver report questionnaire commonly used to measure problem behaviors and behavior change in children and adults with disabilities.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-month follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2022 to primary completion in Dec 2025, 40 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 29, 2024
First posted
Mar 15, 2024
StartActual
Aug 1, 2022
Primary completionActual
Dec 4, 2025
CompletionActual
Dec 4, 2025
Last update
Mar 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06311474
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense
Responsible party
Nicole McDonald, PhD (Assistant Clinical Professor, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 15, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 4, 2025
Completion
Dec 4, 2025
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

Nicole McDonald, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion