CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06298110Updated Mar 8, 2024

The Effect of PRP on Wound Healing in High Risk Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Platelets Rich plasma of the same patient in Wound Heal, Abdominal Wound and PRP, sponsored by Helwan University. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-08.

Sponsored by Helwan University · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2024, 2 years 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

To evaluate the effect of PRP on wound healing in high risk patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.

Read the detailed description

Hysterectomy is one of the most common lines of surgical treatment of various uterine disorders as it provides definitive relief from the associated burdensome symptoms with an estimated prevalence of 13.1 per 10,000 women. The indications for hysterectomy include uterine leiomyomas (fibroid), dysfunctional uterine bleeding, endometrial adenomyosis, genital prolapse, massive postpartum hemorrhages and uterine cancers. Abdominal hysterectomy is still the most commonly used approach although there have been some preferences for vaginal and laparoscopic approaches.

Abdominal hysterectomy is associated with risk of complications. In high-risk women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy, wound healing can be particularly challenging due to a variety of factors, including poor tissue quality, compromised immune function, and underlying medical conditions.

Wound healing is a complex process that involves a series of events that are critical for the restoration of tissue integrity and function. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for enhancing wound healing in high risk patients. PRP is a concentrated source of platelets and growth factors derived from the patient's own blood. It has been shown to promote tissue regeneration and repair by stimulating cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and collagen synthesis. PRP has been used successfully in a variety of clinical settings, including orthopedics, dentistry, and dermatology.

PRP which contains concentrated growth factors have been reported to accelerate wound healing by30-40% giving a satisfactory outcome in the treatment of chronic skin and soft tissue lesions by supplying large amounts of growth factors and chemokines. When platelets become activated, they secrete Seven fundamental protein growth factors initiating all wound healing process, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor (TGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Fibroblast growth factor (FGF), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) \& insulin like growth factor 1(ILGF 1), which participate in the acceleration of wound healing process.

A randomized controlled trial conducted by Tehranian et al. (2016) evaluated the use of PRP in high risk women after caesarian section. The study found that patients treated with PRP had significantly faster wound healing and a significant reduction in pain compared to those who received standard care. Similarly, another study by Fanning et al. (2007) investigated the use of PRP in women undergoing gynecologic surgery, there were no apparent adverse effects, and pain was significantly reduced.

In our study, we will investigate the effect of PRP on wound healing in high risk patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Wound Heal
  • Abdominal Wound
  • PRP

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • PRP
  • Abdominal hysterectomy
  • Wound healing
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

5,056 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 861 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 52 across 3,239 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Helwan University is the lead sponsor of 69 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

    • Female patients aged >18 years.
  • Patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
  • Patients with a high risk of wound healing complications, including: obesity, diabetes mellitus, use of corticosteroid medication or smoking.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Patients with hemoglobin (Hb) \< 10 g/dL.
  • Patients with platelet levels \< 110 × 103/uL.
  • Patients with coagulation disorders (on anticoagulant).
  • Patients with malignancy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PRP group

    on the morning of surgery, 30 mL of venous blood will be drawn from the patient in anticoagulant-containing PRP tube for preparation of PRP solution. The drawn blood will be centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 12 minutes to be separated into three layers: an upper layer that contains platelets and white blood cells, an intermediate thin layer (the buffy coat) that is rich in white blood cells, and a bottom layer that contains red blood cells. The upper and intermediate buffy layers will be transferred to an empty sterile tube. The plasma will be centrifuged again at 3,300 rpm for 7 minutes to help with the formation of soft pellets (erythrocytes and platelets) at the bottom of the tube. Pellets are homogenized in the lower third (5 mL) of the plasma to create the PRP. The prepared PRP solution will be transferred within sterile single use syringe (3cm) from the laboratory to the operation room, then applied and spread over the subcutaneous space before skin closure

    Biological: Platelets Rich plasma of the same patient

  • No intervention
    Control group

    the patients received no topical treatment in the subcutaneous tissue or the skin before closure during surgery

Interventions

  • BiologicalPlatelets Rich plasma of the same patient

    on the morning of surgery, 30 mL of venous blood will be drawn from the patient in anticoagulant-containing PRP tube for preparation of PRP solution. The drawn blood will be centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 12 minutes to be separated into three layers: an upper layer that contains platelets and white blood cells, an intermediate thin layer (the buffy coat) that is rich in white blood cells, and a bottom layer that contains red blood cells. The upper and intermediate buffy layers will be transferred to an empty sterile tube. The plasma will be centrifuged again at 3,300 rpm for 7 minutes to help with the formation of soft pellets (erythrocytes and platelets) at the bottom of the tube. Pellets are homogenized in the lower third (5 mL) of the plasma to create the PRP. The prepared PRP solution will be transferred within sterile single use syringe (3cm) from the laboratory to the operation room, then applied and spread over the subcutaneous space before skin closure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. changes in wound healing

    REEDA descriptive scale will assess degree of wound healing which formed of 4 points in a categorical score assessing 5 items of healing, redness, edema,ecchymosis, discharge approximation of the wound edges, each item is rated on a scale of 0-3 and total score may range between 0-15. lower scores indicating good healing

    Time frame: day 1, day 7, and day 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. Vancouver scar scale changes

    Vancouver scar scale (VSS) use to detect changes of formation of keloids or hypertrophic scars. It assesses 4 subjective variables: vascularity, height/thickness, pliability, and pigmentation within a possible range of 0-14 for the total score. A lower score indicates better healing.

    Time frame: day 1, day 7, and day 30

  2. Visual Analog Scale changes

    Pain was evaluated by the visual analog scale system (VAS) which assesses changes of pain via a continuous measurement instrument. The score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) between the no pain anchor to the point that the patient marks, providing a range of scores from 0-10. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity

    Time frame: day 1, day 7, and day 30

  3. Hospital readmission

    Need to hospital readmission due to wound complications

    Time frame: 1 month post-operatively

  4. Infection

    Presence of infection after surgery

    Time frame: Up to 1 month

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Akca A, Yilmaz G, Koroglu N. Platelet Indices as the Predictor of Antibiotics Response in Surgical Wound Infections Following Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2019 Jun 24;53(2):132-136. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2019.46693. eCollection 2019. PubMed 32377071 ↗
  • Fanning J, Murrain L, Flora R, Hutchings T, Johnson JM, Fenton BW. Phase I/II prospective trial of autologous platelet tissue graft in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):633-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.05.014. PubMed 17848327 ↗
  • Gohar MM, Ali RF, Ismail KA, Ismail TA, Nosair NA. Assessment of the effect of platelet rich plasma on the healing of operated sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus by lay-open technique: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Surg. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00865-x. PubMed 32962673 ↗
  • Madueke-Laveaux OS, Elsharoud A, Al-Hendy A. What We Know about the Long-Term Risks of Hysterectomy for Benign Indication-A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):5335. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225335. PubMed 34830617 ↗
  • Moscicka P, Przylipiak A. History of autologous platelet-rich plasma: A short review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Sep;20(9):2712-2714. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14326. Epub 2021 Jul 14. PubMed 34214233 ↗
  • Rodrigues M, Kosaric N, Bonham CA, Gurtner GC. Wound Healing: A Cellular Perspective. Physiol Rev. 2019 Jan 1;99(1):665-706. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00067.2017. PubMed 30475656 ↗
  • Tehranian A, Esfehani-Mehr B, Pirjani R, Rezaei N, Sadat Heidary S, Sepidarkish M. Application of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) on Wound Healing After Caesarean Section in High-Risk Patients. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 May 17;18(7):e34449. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.34449. eCollection 2016 Jul. PubMed 27660723 ↗
  • Veevers-Lowe J, Ball SG, Shuttleworth A, Kielty CM. Mesenchymal stem cell migration is regulated by fibronectin through alpha5beta1-integrin-mediated activation of PDGFR-beta and potentiation of growth factor signals. J Cell Sci. 2011 Apr 15;124(Pt 8):1288-300. doi: 10.1242/jcs.076935. Epub 2011 Mar 23. PubMed 21429937 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06298110
Lead sponsor
Helwan University
Responsible party
Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed El sayed (Doctor, Helwan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 7, 2024
Start date
Mar 10, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 25, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 25, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 8, 2024

Study contacts

Ahmed El Sayed, M.B.B.Ch
Contact
ahmed_mohammed_ahmed@med.helwan.edu.eg
01119228215
Shimaa Bilal, Professor
study chair · Helwan University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion