ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06291766Updated Aug 22, 2025

Gestational Diabetes After Gastric Bypass Surgery

An interventional study of FreeStyle Libre 2, continous glucose monitoring in Diabetes, Gestational, Gastric Bypass Status for Obesity Complicating Pregnancy, Childbirth, or the Puerperium and Pregnancy in Diabetic, sponsored by Region Skane. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-22.

Sponsored by Region Skane · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this trial is to compare different means of glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes and a history of gastric bypass surgery.

The main question it aims to answer is:

How does continous glucose monitoring impact the treatment and affect pregnancy outcome in these women.

Participants will be randomized to either continous glucose monitoring or regular capillary glucose measurements during the last trimester of their pregnancy. Researchers will compare the glucose measurement outcomes, the glucose lowering treatment given and pregnancy outcomes between groups.

Read the detailed description

The project aims to investigate gestational diabetes in women with a history of gastric bypass surgery (GBP). The investigators will analyse glucose levels by using continuous glucose measurement (GCM) or capillary glucose measurements and compare mean glucose values, treatment and the pregnancy outcome.

In Sweden the incidence of gestational diabetes is 2-5% of pregnancies, but the frequency varies greatly in different areas and in different ethnicities. The women with gestational diabetes have an increased risk of complications during pregnancy. The most acknowledged complications are large for gestational age infants (LGA), preeclampsia and caesarean section. The infants have a higher need for neonatal intensive care, due to the risk of hypoglycaemia, hypoxia and jaundice postpartum. Treating gestational diabetes and normalizing glucose values have been proven to reduce risks of unfavourable pregnancy outcome.

Gastric bypass surgery is a common treatment for obesity. The frequency of young women with gastric bypass surgery and concomitant gestational diabetes have increased. Many maternity care centres have started to use a 3-7 day screening for gestational diabetes, since the routine oral glucose toleration test (OGTT) is not recommended after GBP. It is previously shown that women with GBP have a decreased risk of GDM and LGA infants. However, there is an increased risk of small for gestational age (SGA). There is a lack of knowledge and guidelines regarding the optimal treatment of gestational diabetes in these women. How the glucose variability affects pregnancy outcome is poorly investigated. At Lund University Hospital, Region Skane, Sweden, the screening procedure used since 2012 for GDM-screening in women with GBP is a 3 day 7-point capillary glucose measurement. Approximately 25% of the pregnant women with GBP is diagnosed with GDM, using this method at Lund University Hospital.

In this project the investigators will randomize women with gestational diabetes and a history of gastric bypass (GDM-GBP) into two different groups in the last trimester of pregnancy. Both groups are given standard medical care, which includes visits to the Specialized Maternity Care Unit and weekly follow up by the diabetologist. The first group is given continuous glucose measurement (FreeStyle Libre3) and the other group is given standard medical care which includes 7-point capillary glucose measurement. With the CGM system it is possible to collect more comprehensive data regarding glucose values and variability. Previous studies have shown that women with gastric bypass surgery have an earlier than normal postprandial glucose excursion and are more prone to later postprandial hypoglycaemia. During this study, the physician as well as the patient can observe the early glucose excursion after meals and measure time in target, time above target and time below target. Large for gestational age and accelerated growth of the infant is supposed to be due to high glucose values and a high proportion of Time above target. The increased risk of SGA infants in these women is hypothesized to be due to a large proportion of time below target. However, this theory is not sufficiently investigated and it is not known if the use of CGM can help to reduce the risk of weight deviation in the infants.

The investigators want to examine if new technique in glucose measurement can contribute to more favourable pregnancy outcome in women with gestational diabetes and a history of GDM. The main question is if the use of CGM affect pregnancy outcome. The secondary outcomes includes glucose variability and the use of different treatment approaches in GDM in this group of women.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes, Gestational
  • Gastric Bypass Status for Obesity Complicating Pregnancy, Childbirth, or the Puerperium
  • Pregnancy in Diabetic
  • Blood Glucose Self Monitoring
03

In context

Diabetes, Gestational

877 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes, Gestational; 203 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is close to the median of 110 across 564 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes, Gestational.

Browse Diabetes, Gestational studies →

Lead sponsor

Region Skane is the lead sponsor of 386 studies on the registry; 122 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Understands written and spoken Swedish
  • Previous Gastric Bypass surgery
  • Diagnosed with gestational diabetes according to our local criteria
  • Planned follow up at the Specialized Maternity Ward at Skane University Hospital
  • Understands the use of CGM and is willing to use the system
  • Have signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other kinds of bariatric surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Continous glucose measurement

    Use of FreeStyle Libre 3, with Libre Link app and Glooko app for measurement and review of glucose measurements.

    Device: FreeStyle Libre 2, continous glucose monitoring

  • No intervention
    Capillary glucose measurement

    Standard care, including capillary glucose measurements and Glooko app for review of glucose measurements.

Interventions

  • DeviceFreeStyle Libre 2, continous glucose monitoring

    The use of FreeStyle Libre 3 sensors and Libre Link app and Glooko app for analysing glucose control in pregnancy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse Pregnancy Outcome

    ANY: Caesarian section (Y/N), instrumental delivery (Y/N), preeclampsia (Y/N), premature birth before week 37 (Y/N), Macrosomia (\>4000g) (Y/N), Large for gestational age infant (Y/N), small for gestational age infant (Y/N), shoulder dystocia (Y/N), neonatal hypoglycemia (Y/N) (\<4 hours after birth: \<1.4 mmol/L; 4 to \<24 hours after birth: \<1.9 mmol/L; 24 to \<48 hours after birth: \<2.8 mmol/L, ≥48 hours after birth: 3.3 mmol/L

    Time frame: During delivery and postpartum (measured up to 5 days postpartum)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Glucose values

    Mean/median glucose values (mmol/l)

    Time frame: Gestational week 28-42

  2. Glucose values

    Glucose variability (SD)

    Time frame: Gestational week 28-42

  3. Glucose values

    % Time in Target (3,5-7,8 mmol/l)

    Time frame: Gestational week 28-42

  4. Glucose values

    % Time below target

    Time frame: Gestational week 28-42

  5. Glucose values

    % Time above target

    Time frame: Gestational week 28-42

  6. Pharmacological treatment

    The use of insulin (Y/N)

    Time frame: Gestational week 28-42

  7. Pharmacological treatment

    the dose of insulin (IE)

    Time frame: Gestational week 28-42

  8. Pharmacological treatment

    the use of Metformin (Y/N)

    Time frame: Gestational week 28-42

  9. Pharmacological treatment

    the dose of metformin (g/day)

    Time frame: Gestational week 28-42

  10. Birthweight

    birth weight of infant (g)

    Time frame: at the day of birth

  11. Week of delivery

    gestational week

    Time frame: exact day (ie 28+0 to 42+6)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Moll U, Landin-Olsson M, Nilsson C, Ursing D, Strevens H. Pregnancy outcome in women with gestational diabetes - A longitudinal study of changes in demography and treatment modalities. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Mar;99(3):333-340. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13758. Epub 2019 Dec 22. PubMed 31654523 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06291766
Lead sponsor
Region Skane
Responsible party
Ulrika Moll (MD, PhD, Region Skane) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 4, 2024
Start date
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2035 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 22, 2025

Study contacts

Ulrika Moll, MD, PhD
Contact
ulrika.moll@skane.se
+46733307170
Ulrika Moll, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Region Skane

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion