ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06285292PRIMEUpdated Jun 25, 2026

Prospective and Comparative Evaluation of a Medical Device Composed of a Perineal Probe Connected to a Mobile Application in the Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence.

An interventional study of EMY in Urinary Incontinence, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-25.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
138
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects around 40% of women and has a major impact on quality of life. The gold standard for the treatment of SUI is pelvicfloor rehabilitation, but this presents constraints in terms of availability of healthcare professionals, as well as organization and travel for patients. Innovative devices offer self-training exercises for the pelvicfloor, thus promoting motivation and adherence to treatment. The hypothesis of this study is to prove that the use of a pelvicfloor medical device combined with 2 rehabilitation sessions is not inferior to pelvic-perineal rehabilitation.

Read the detailed description

Two groups will be studied:

  • the control group will undergo 15 sessions of pelvic-perineal rehabilitation, corresponding to the gold standard.
  • the intervention group will use the medical device 3 times a week for 15 minutes over a 3-month period, in addition to 2 rehabilitation sessions. The participant will then be able to modify her program according to her symptoms.

Recruitment will be carried out with the help of healthcare professionals. The investigators involved in the study will be physiotherapists specializing in pelvic-perineal rehabilitation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Incontinence

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • urinary incontinence, pelvic-floor muscles, pelvic-perineal rehabilitation
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

983 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 180 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 138 is above the median of 66 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 839 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with moderate, severe or very severe stress urinary incontinence or mixed stress urinary incontinence (according to ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire score: moderate (6-12), severe (13-18) and very severe (19-21))
  • Patient aged between 18 and 60
  • Patient with a quality of life score measured with the I-QoL questionnaire less than or equal to 70 (score measured from 0 to 100, with poor quality of life: 0-35; average quality of life: 36-70; good quality of life: 71-100)
  • Not to have given birth in the last 6 months (to avoid post-partum physiological recovery)
  • Signed
  • Effective throughout the study (declarative)
  • Patient must have a smartphone running at least Android 7 and iOS 12
  • Patient must be able to read and write French

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mild stress urinary incontinence or mixed stress urinary incontinence (ICIQ-UI SF score: mild (1-5))
  • Patient with a quality of life score above 70 (according to the I-QoL questionnaire: good quality of life: 71-100)
  • Patient undergoing other pelvic-perineal rehabilitation during the study period
  • Patients with neurological disease or congenital malformation, surgically or medically treated urinary incontinence or prolapse, perineal hypoesthesia or local conditions prohibiting the use of an intravaginal catheter
  • Infection of the bladder or vagina, or any symptoms associated with infection (itching, pain on urination or fever)
  • to the use of the medical device
  • Anatomy making catheter placement difficult or impossible; in the case of prolapse, specialist advice is recommended.
  • Hemorrhage
  • Patients with genitourinary cancer (within the last 5 years)
  • Patients with extra-urethral "incontinence" (fistula, ectopic ureter)
  • Patients with severe urinary retention
  • Patient with vesico-ureteral reflux
  • Patients with hypoactive bladder
  • In case of peripheral denervation in the pelvic-perineal area, specialist advice is recommended
  • Patients wearing a sacral neuromodulation device
  • Patients in an exclusion period (determined by a previous or current study)
  • Impossibility of giving the subject clear information (subject in an emergency situation, difficulties in understanding the subject, etc.)
  • Patient under court protection
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test)
  • Breastfeeding (as the hormonal impregnation caused by breastfeeding has a negative impact on perineal tone)
  • Use of Huawei and Oppo smartphones
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
138 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EMY (connected biofeedback medical device)

    2 rehabilitation between M0 and M2 and pelvic-perineal exercises with the EMY device on 3 different days a week, for 15 minutes, over a period of 3 months.

    Device: EMY

  • No intervention
    standard

    15 sessions of pelvic floor rehabilitation (gold standard)

Interventions

  • DeviceEMY

    Patients in the "intervention" group (rehabilitation with the EMY medical device) will undergo 2 rehabilitation sessions with a physiotherapist trained in pelviperineology between M0 and M2. The aim of these sessions will be to learn proper perineal contraction and combat the deficits identified during the physiotherapist's assessment. They will have to perform pelvic-perineal re-education exercises with the EMY device on 3 different days a week, for 15 minutes, over a period of 3 months. Then, for a further 3 months, their program can be modified for free, on-demand use (e.g. 2 x 10 minutes per week). After the main criterion at M6, they will be free to modify their rehabilitation program in the application according to their symptoms, and follow their program until the end of the study

    Also known as: pelvic-perineal probe

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Urinary symptoms using the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire

    The non-inferiority of 2 sessions of pelvic floor rehabilitation associated with the use of the EMY medical device compared with 15 sessions of pelvic floor rehabilitation (gold standard) on the urinary symptoms score at 6 months will be assessed using the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life using the I-QoL questionnaire

    changes in quality of life will be studied using the validated I - QoL questionnaire

    Time frame: 0 month, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  2. Urinary symptoms using the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire

    changes in urinary symptoms will be studied using the validated ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire

    Time frame: 0 month, 1 month, 3 months, 12 months

  3. Cost-utility ratio using the EQ-5D questionnaire

    The cost/utility ratio will be studied using the cost/QALY ratio. The costs will relate to the consumption of reimbursed or non-reimbursed care (medical and paramedical consultations, hospitalization, drug treatment, absorbent pads, pessaries, etc.). QALYs will be estimated on the basis of responses to the validated EQ-5D 5L questionnaire.

    Time frame: 0 month, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  4. Qualitative component

    the qualitative component will consist of questionnaires evaluating : * consumption of care at M0, M1, M3, M6 and M12 ; * ease of access to care at M1 ; * treatment satisfaction with the standardized PGI-I questionnaire and the question "do you recommend your treatment to a friend ?" at M3; * treatment adherence using a diary and a Likert scale between M0 and M3

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 24 months after the start.

Of 301 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Urinary Incontinence, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 364 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 22, 2024
First posted
Feb 29, 2024
StartActual
Nov 25, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Nov 25, 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 25, 2026
Last update
Jun 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06285292
Collaborators
FIZIMED Company
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 29, 2024
Start date
Nov 25, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 25, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 25, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 25, 2026

Study contacts

Thibault THUBERT, PHD
Contact
thibault.thubert@chu-nantes.fr
02.53.48.24.43
Selma EL ANDALOUSSI, manager
Contact
selma.elandaloussi@chu-nantes.fr
02.53.48.28.52

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion