ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06284733Updated Jul 30, 2024

Whole-body Vibration Without Visual Feedback on Postural Steadiness in Unilateral Trans-femoral Traumatic Amputees

An interventional study of Whole-body vibration plus conservative care and conservative care in Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower, sponsored by MTI University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-30.

Sponsored by MTI University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
115
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will investigate the effects of Whole-body vibration without visual feedback on postural steadiness in unilateral trans-femoral traumatic amputees. This study will be carried out at the outpatient clinic of the faculty of physical therapy, modern university for technology and information, and El Wafaa wel Amal hospital.

All participants will sign a written consent form after receiving full information about the purpose of the study, procedure, possible benefits, privacy, and use of data.

Read the detailed description

The postural steadiness is the dynamics of the postural control system associated with maintaining balance during quiet standing and usually assessed by the displacement of the centre of pressure (COP).

The control of posture is maintained by a complex sensory-motor system, which integrates information from the visual, proprioceptive, vestibular and somato-sensory systems. In the case of a unilateral trans femoral amputee, the individual becomes structurally asymmetrical, as there is an altered sensation and a loss of musculature on the amputated side. Whole-body vibration (WBV) is a therapeutic method that exposes the entire body to mechanical oscillations while the patient stands or sits on a vibrating platform. This method was used in rehabilitation to improve muscle function, joint stability, balance control and to reduce the risk of falling.

Whole-body vibration (WBV) training helps to improve the dysfunction of the nervous system and musculoskeletal system diseases, to prevent and relieve osteoporosis in the elderly, and to promote sports injury recovery and improve sports performance. But till now there is no judgment concerning the difference and significance of Whole-body vibration without visual feedback on postural steadiness in unilateral trans-femoral traumatic amputees.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • postural stability
  • amputee
03

In context

Amputation, Traumatic

112 studies on the registry are indexed under Amputation, Traumatic; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 115 is above the median of 15 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Amputation, Traumatic.

Browse Amputation, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

MTI University is the lead sponsor of 61 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 40 to 55 years of age.
  • Residual femoral length from ischial tuberosity to the end of the limb with distal soft tissue compressed (15-35 cm)
  • Unilateral trans-femoral traumatic amputation with single-axis mechanical knees, axial foot (single axis).
  • Able to walk without the use of any assistive device; subjects must have obtained a score of > 5 for Houghton Scale to indicate active use of prosthesis and > 41 for Berg Balance Scale (BBS).
  • Medicare level 3 (community) ambulatory or above.
  • Ability to descend stairs and hills without caregiver and assistive devices.
  • Be able to independently provide .
  • Be willing to comply with study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reduced somatosensory sensibility of the non-affected limb, ulceration or pain at the stump
  • the amputation was of vascular origin
  • Poor fittings of prosthesis
  • Visual or vestibular impairment (vertigo or dizziness)
  • Lower limb musculoskeletal injury and other neurological deficits
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
115 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A (WBV group)(30 HZ,4 mm ,eyes open)

    This group includes 36 patients with unilateral trans-femoral traumatic amputation; they will receive WBV and conservative care.

    Device: Whole-body vibration plus conservative care · Other: conservative care

  • Experimental
    Group B (visual feedback-deprived and WBV (VFD WBV) (30 HZ,4 mm ,eyes close)

    This group includes 36 patients with unilateral trans-femoral traumatic amputation; they will receive visual feedback-deprived plus WBV (VFDWBV) and conservative care.

    Device: Whole-body vibration plus conservative care · Other: conservative care

  • Sham comparator
    Group C(control group (0 Hz, eyes open)

    This group includes 36 patients with unilateral trans-femoral traumatic amputation; they will receive conservative care.

    Other: conservative care

Interventions

  • DeviceWhole-body vibration plus conservative care

    Whole-body vibration (WBV) is a therapeutic method that exposes the entire body to mechanical oscillations while the patient stands or sits on a vibrating platform. This method was used in rehabilitation to improve muscle function, joint stability, balance control and to reduce the risk of falling.

  • Otherconservative care

    1. Stretching and ROM exercises daily to make sure that the patient can straighten hip; this makes walking, and even lying in bed, more comfortable. 2. Resting hip on a pillow, as this promotes a hip flexion contracture 3. A pillow between legs, as this lengthens the inner thigh muscle that helps to keep legs together while walking, and shortens the outer thigh muscles so that walking and standing with feet apart. 4. Regular skin care. 5. Regular prosthetic care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prosthetic leg stability test

    Prior to testing, the subject will be asked to center the foot on the platform in a position that will be level and stable. This foot placement will maintained through -out all 3 trials for the prosthetic leg. This position will be used as the level reference point from which degree of displacement was measured. The subject will instructed to stand on foot with the knee slightly flexed (15°) on the platform, with the contralateral knee flexed to 90° for 20 seconds (test period). Level 8 will be selected for use during testing

    Time frame: base line and after 12 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sway Index

    The CTSIB (Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance) is a standard test for postural steadiness on different surfaces. This test was designed to assess the patient's ability to integrate sensory information to maintain body equilibrium.

    Time frame: base line after 12 weeks

  2. Limits of Stability Test

    The subjects will be asked to move directly toward the target, the best expected outcome was a straight path. During this test, 8 targets will be presented in each direction, and the subjects were randomly given instructions. The subjects will be requested to move their centre of gravity toward the targets, touch them, and then return to the center.

    Time frame: base line after 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Abdelhady
    Cairo, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06284733
Lead sponsor
MTI University
Responsible party
Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Abd El hady El Fahl,ph.d (lectrurer of physical therapy for general surgery and dermatology, MTI University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 29, 2024
Start date
Feb 22, 2024
Primary completion
May 29, 2024
Completion
Jun 10, 2024
Last update
Jul 30, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion