CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06275087PSIOSUpdated Dec 24, 2025

Differences in Speed of Recovery From Anesthesia for Intraoral Surgery

An interventional study of Propofol and Sevoflurane in Intraoral Tumor, sponsored by Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb. Recruiting at 1 site in Croatia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-24.

Sponsored by Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two groups of patients going in general anesthesia for intraoral surgery, the first group TIVA with propofol and the second group inhalational with sevoflurane. The main questions it aims to answer are to asses speed and quality of recovery from general anesthesia.

Participants will fill out a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of recovery from anesthesia using the QoR-40 1h, 24h, and 30 days after waking up from anesthesia in comparison to the results of the same questionnaire before surgery. Also, the investigators will perform a hand grip and bite strength test on the patients after waking up from anesthesia in the operating room, after 1 hour in the recovery room, and after 24 hours compared to preoperative values.

The investigators will compare TIVA and Volatile groups to see if there are any differences in recovery seed, muscle strength recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and shivering between groups.

Read the detailed description

After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee of KBC Zagreb and the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Zagreb, the research will be conducted at KBC Zagreb.

Criteria for patient inclusion are:

  • patients older than 18 years
  • ASA status 1-2,
  • Patients who have an indication for an intraoral surgical procedure (intraoral tumor excisions) longer than 30 minutes.
  • patients who agreed to the research and signed the consent

Exclusion criteria are:

  • ASA status 3 and higher,
  • The need for postoperative care in the ICU,
  • Surgery lasting more than 2 hours,
  • Surgical procedures that in the operative plan include injuries to the grip of the masticatory muscles, the masticatory muscles themselves, and procedures on the bone, and thus may result in a difference in the strength of the bite. Masticatory muscles are defined as musculus pterygoideus lateralis, musculus pterygoideus medialis, musculus temporalis and musculus masseter.
  • Surgical procedures on the bone where the bite force test alone could cause injury
  • Patients with diseases of the neuromuscular junction and muscle diseases, myopathy, dystrophy
  • Patients taking medications that can cause myopathy or muscle weakness
  • Known allergies to drugs used in the trial,
  • Refusing to participate

Participants will be randomly divided (1:1 randomisation) according to a predetermined randomization table (32) into the TIVA group and the Volatile group. After identification of the participants in the operating room, participants will be fitted with a peripheral venous line, electrocardiogram monitoring, non-invasive blood pressure measurement, pulse oximeter, capnograph, temperature probe, and bispectral index (BIS) of the electroencephalogram and neuromuscular monitoring, kinemiography with train-of-four (TOF , M-NMT, Drägerwerk AG \& Co. KGaA,) by recording the responses.

The initial anesthesiological induction procedure will not differ in both groups of patients. The drugs that will be used are sufentanil 0.3mcg/kg, propofol 2mg/kg, and cisatracurium 0.1mg/kg.

Participants will be intubated with an endotracheal tube and mechanically ventilated with a mixture of oxygen and air (inspiratory fraction of oxygen 40%) with a total flow of gas mixture of 3 L/min.

Anesthesia will be maintained in the volatile group with the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane and single doses of cisatracurium. Cisatracurium will be repeated when the TOF ratio is greater than 5%, and the repeat dose will be 0.01 mg/kg. The depth of anesthesia will be controlled by BIS, maintaining values between 25 and 50. Recommended drug doses will be guided by TOF and BIS values.

In the TIVA group, anesthesia will be maintained with a continuous infusion of propofol (5-10 mg/kg/h) and single doses of cisatracurium. Cisatracurium will be repeated when the TOF ratio is greater than 5%, and the repeat dose will be 0.01 mg/kg. The depth of anesthesia will be controlled by BIS, maintaining values between 25 and 50. Recommended drug doses will be guided by TOF and BIS values.

At the end of the surgical intervention in both groups, the neuromuscular block will be antagonized with prostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) along with atropine (0.01 mg/kg) as soon as the patient begins to breathe spontaneously. Patients will then be extubated when the TOF index is greater than 90%

Muscle strength of all participants will be measured with a JAMAR hand dynamometer, and bite force with a gnathodynamometer (Bite force sensor, Monad electronics) in four time intervals:

  1. Before introduction to anesthesia
  2. After waking up from anesthesia in the operating room
  3. 1 hour after waking up from anesthesia in the recovery room
  4. After 24 hours from the operation

All patients will fill out the Quality of recovery-40 (Qor-40) questionnaire for assessing the quality of recovery after anesthesia and surgery in four time intervals:

  1. Before introduction to anesthesia
  2. 1 hour after waking up from anesthesia in the recovery room
  3. After 24 hours from the operation
  4. After 30 days from the operation Consent for the use of the QoR-40 questionnaire was obtained by the main researcher from the author, Professor P.S. Myles, and Dr. M. Miklić Bublić, who translated the questionnaire into Croatian.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative shivering will also be recorded, as a binary outcome (yes/no), by visual assessment and interaction with the patient.

The time from the end of the operation to waking up will be monitored. Pain will also be recorded based on QoR40 and the visual analogue scale (VAS-scale) for pain assessment. The patient's chronic therapy is recorded, as is the need for postoperative analgesia.

Assuming medium to large effect size, test power of 80% and use of independent t-test for the primary objective and x2 test for the secondary objective with a statistical significance of 0.05, it is necessary to take a sample of 42 patients, 21 subjects per group. . The test for power calculation is G Power Version 3.1.9.6 (46). Assuming that part of the respondents will not be able to follow up until the end of the research, a sample of 50 patients will be taken, that is, 25 patients in each group. A review of similar studies confirmed the sample size (18,47,48). The results will be processed with IBM SPSS statistics v27. For scalar parametric data, the independent Student t test will be used, for non-parametric data, the Mann-Whitney U test, while categorical data will be processed with the Pearson χ² test. One interim analysis for feasibility and precision estimation is planned.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intraoral Tumor

Keywords

  • TIVA
  • Propofol
  • Intraoral surgery
  • Postoperative recovery
  • recovery of muscle strenght
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Criteria for patient inclusion are:

  • patients older than 18 years
  • ASA status 1-2,
  • Patients who have an indication for an intraoral surgical procedure longer than 30 minutes.
  • Surgical interventions on the soft tissues of the mouth, intraoral excision of tumors, operated through the transoral route
  • Patients who agreed to the research and signed the consent

The exclusion criteria are:

  • ASA status 3 and higher,
  • The need for postoperative care in the ICU,
  • Surgery lasting more than 2 hours,
  • Surgical procedures that in the operative plan include injuries to the grip of the masticatory muscles, the masticatory muscles themselves, and procedures on the bone, and thus may result in a difference in the strength of the bite. Masticatory muscles are defined as musculus pterygoideus lateralis, musculus pterygoideus medialis, musculus temporalis and musculus masseter.
  • Surgical procedures on the bone where the bite force test alone could cause injury
  • Patients with diseases of the neuromuscular junction and muscle diseases, myopathy, dystrophy
  • Patients taking medications that can cause myopathy or muscle weakness
  • Known allergies to drugs used in the trial,
  • Refusing to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TIVA group

    The study involves patients in an operating room undergoing standard procedures. The induction procedure for anesthesia is the same for both groups, using sufentanil, propofol, and cisatracurium. In the TIVA group, anesthesia is maintained with continuous propofol infusion and intermittent cisatracurium doses, guided by neuromuscular and electroencephalogram monitoring. At the end of surgery, neuromuscular block is reversed, and extubation occurs when the train-of-four (TOF) index is over 90%. Muscle strength and bite force are measured at different intervals before and after anesthesia, using specific instruments. Additionally, patients fill out the Quality of recovery-40 (Qor-40) questionnaire at various time points to assess the quality of recovery after surgery and anesthesia.

    Drug: Propofol

  • Active comparator
    Volatile group

    In the volatile group, anesthesia is maintained with inhaled sevoflurane and intermittent cisatracurium doses. Cisatracurium is repeated based on TOF ratio, and anesthesia depth is controlled by BIS, maintaining values between 25 and 50. Drug doses are adjusted according to TOF and BIS values.

    Drug: Sevoflurane

Interventions

  • DrugPropofol

    The experimental group will not receive volatile anesthetic, instead, they will receive propofol infusion

    Also known as: TIVA

  • DrugSevoflurane

    The control group will not receive TIVA, instead, they will receive sevoflurane via inhalation

    Also known as: general volatile anesthesia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. "Quality of recovery from anesthesia" QoR-40 questionnaire

    The QoR-40 is a recovery-specific and patient-rated questionnaire that contains 40 items measuring five dimensions: the physical comfort (12 items), emotional state (nine items), physical independence (five items), psychological support (seven items) and pain (seven items). The total score and subscales of the QoR-40 are measured using a five-point Likert scale (for positive items: 1 = none of the time, 5 = all of the time; for negative items, the scoring was reversed) and individual scores are then added together, with the minimum score being 40 points and the maximum score being 200 points. The QoR-40 was specifically designed to measure a patient's health status after surgery and anesthesia, and its completion time generally ranges from three to 10 min. The Japanese version of the QoR-40 was also validated according to standard methods of cultural adaptation and psychometric analysis in 2011.

    Time frame: 1 hour, 24 hour, 30 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. bite strength and hand grip strength

    Hand-grip muscle strength and bite strength will be measured with a dynamometer on three occasions: before general anesthesia, in the early post-anesthesia period in the operating room, and 24 hours after anesthesia.

    Time frame: after waking in OR up to 10 min, 1 hour after waking, 24 hour after waking

  2. Postoperative nausea and vomiting

    determine the difference in the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Postoperative shivering

    determine the difference in the frequency of postoperative shivering

    Time frame: 2 hour

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
    • Ivan Šitum · Contact · ivsitum@gmail.com · 0915143620
    • Ivan Šitum · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Diniz JA, Siqueira ADS, Araujo GM, Faro TF, Torres LHS, Oliveira E Silva ED, Laureano Filho JR. Intraoral Approach for Surgical Treatment of Psammomatoid Juvenile Ossifying Fibroma. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 May/Jun;31(3):e306-e309. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006171. PubMed 31934971 ↗
  • Ferreira, C. C., Pereira, M. B. F., Bruzinga, F. F. B., Castro, H. H. O., Souto, G. R., Souza, P. E. A., & De Oliveira, L. J. (2022, September). AN UNUSUAL INTRAORAL LIPOMA: A CASE REPORT. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 134(3), e119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2022.01.212
  • Frerich, B. (2020). Complications in Maxillofacial Tumor Surgery. Complications in Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40150-4_13
  • Tamunobelema, D. M. S., & Uruaka, C. I. (2023, March 11). General Anaesthetic Agents and its Implication on the Cardiovascular System: A Systemic Review. Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9(03), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjmps.2023.v09i03.006
  • Qurbani, B., & Karim, S. B. (2022, December 29). Comparison among complications of common intravenous anesthetic drugs during general anesthesia for patients undergoing surgery in Sulaimani city. Annals of the College of Medicine, Mosul, 44(2), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.33899/mmed.2022.136178.1166
  • Fiorda-Diaz, J., Stoicea, N., & Bergese, S. (2017). Anesthetic Agents. Essentials of Neuroanesthesia, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-805299-0.00007-5
  • Hao X, Ou M, Zhang D, Zhao W, Yang Y, Liu J, Yang H, Zhu T, Li Y, Zhou C. The Effects of General Anesthetics on Synaptic Transmission. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(10):936-965. doi: 10.2174/1570159X18666200227125854. PubMed 32106800 ↗
  • Monisha, B., Madhusudhana, R., & Sujatha, M. (2023). Effects of Isoflurane versus Propofol for Postoperative Neurocognitive Recovery in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Study. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/62147.17888
  • Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS. A review of ASA physical status - historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia. 2019 Mar;74(3):373-379. doi: 10.1111/anae.14569. Epub 2019 Jan 15. PubMed 30648259 ↗
  • Saha, D. S. C., & Seraji, D. S. I. (2023, April 16). A Comparative Study of Propofol and Sevoflurane for General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, 11(04), 753-757. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2023.v11i04.014
  • Yang L, Chen Z, Xiang D. Effects of intravenous anesthesia with sevoflurane combined with propofol on intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative stress disorder and cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Sep-Oct;38(7):1938-1944. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.7.5763. PubMed 36246684 ↗
  • Miao L, Lv X, Huang C, Li P, Sun Y, Jiang H. Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0268473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268473. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35559987 ↗
  • Zhou, Y., & Xu, T. (2022, January 24). Effect of propofol and sevoflurane on perioperative and postoperative outcomes in lung cancer patients after thoracoscopic surgery. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 20(4), 873-879. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v20i4.30
  • Wu L, Li Y, Si J. Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients with colorectal cancer placed under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Dec;13(6):2963-2972. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-783. PubMed 36636047 ↗
  • Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366. PubMed 10740540 ↗
  • Miklic Bublic M, Miklic P, Barl P, Matas M, Sekulic A. CROATIAN VERSION OF THE QUALITY OF RECOVERY QUESTIONNAIRE (QoR-40): TRANSCULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION. Acta Clin Croat. 2021 Jun;60(2):237-245. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.02.09. PubMed 34744273 ↗
  • Kim DH, Min KT, Kim EH, Choi YS, Choi SH. Comparison of the effects of inhalational and total intravenous anesthesia on quality of recovery in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Med Sci. 2022 Jun 13;19(6):1056-1064. doi: 10.7150/ijms.72758. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35813289 ↗
  • Meng W, Yang C, Wei X, Wang S, Kang F, Huang X, Li J. Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec 1;21(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01519-y. PubMed 34852781 ↗
  • Shi CM, Zhou Y, Yang N, Li ZQ, Tao YF, Deng Y, Guo XY. [Quality of psychomotility recovery after propofol sedation for painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Apr 18;55(2):324-327. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.02.017. Chinese. PubMed 37042144 ↗
  • Kim SH, Ju HM, Choi CH, Park HR, Shin S. Inhalational versus intravenous maintenance of anesthesia for quality of recovery in patients undergoing corrective lower limb osteotomy: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247089. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33606764 ↗
  • Tomita S, Matsuura N, Ichinohe T. The combined effects of midazolam and propofol sedation on muscle power. Anaesthesia. 2013 May;68(5):478-83. doi: 10.1111/anae.12172. Epub 2013 Mar 22. PubMed 23521655 ↗
  • Wen LL, Lin WQ, Zhao WX, Li GC, Bai XH, Xiao JB. [Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on neuromuscular blockade by continuous cisatracurium infusion]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010 Jan;30(1):163-5. Chinese. PubMed 20118012 ↗
  • Man, Mi, & Han. (2011, September 1). Influence of sevoflurane and propofol on the neuromuscular block effect of cisatracurium. Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 36, 973-975. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Influence-of-sevoflurane-and-propofol-on-the-block-Man-Mi/eb40663a5683c9cc22116520104ca02a66c8b6de#citing-papers
  • Pan, C., Xing, Y., Zhang, D., Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Shi, L., Xu, M., & Zhang, B. (2023, June 6). Combined remifentanil/sevoflurane in paediatric tonsil surgery anesthesia: Effect on recovery time of respiration and consciousness in paediatric patients. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 22(5), 1073-1079. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v22i5.20
  • Interlandi C, Di Pietro S, Costa GL, Spadola F, Iannelli NM, Macri D, Ferrantelli V, Macri F. Effects of Cisatracurium in Sevoflurane and Propofol Requirements in Dog-Undergoing-Mastectomy Surgery. Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 14;12(22):3134. doi: 10.3390/ani12223134. PubMed 36428361 ↗
  • Liu J, Yang L. Effects of propofol and sevoflurane on blood glucose, hemodynamics, and inflammatory factors of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2020 Feb;19(2):1187-1194. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.11201. Epub 2019 Dec 10. PubMed 31966048 ↗
  • ALKAYA SOLMAZ, F., & KIRDEMİR, P. (2020, March 2). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and anesthesia. Acta Medica Alanya, 4(1), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.30565/medalanya.587027
  • Bennett J, McDonald T, Lieblich S, Piecuch J. Perioperative rehydration in ambulatory anesthesia for dentoalveolar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Sep;88(3):279-84. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70028-4. PubMed 10503854 ↗
  • Pollard BJ, Bryan A, Bennett D, Faragher EB, Un EN, Keegan M, Wilson A, Burkill M, Beatty PC, Stollery BT, et al. Recovery after oral surgery with halothane, enflurane, isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1994 May;72(5):559-66. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.5.559. PubMed 8198909 ↗
  • Asakura A, Mihara T, Goto T. The Effect of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate or Oral Rehydration Solution on Postoperative Quality of Recovery: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0133309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133309. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26317629 ↗
  • Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. Wiley; in 1983
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. PubMed 19897823 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — If there is a need and desire on the part of other researchers, data on patients without personal data can be shared

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06275087
Lead sponsor
Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb
Responsible party
Ivan Šitum, MD (Principal invesigator, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 23, 2024
Start date
Apr 10, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 5, 2025
Completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 24, 2025

Study contacts

Ivan Šitum, MD
Contact
ivsitum@gmail.com
0915143620
Ivan Šitum, MD
principal investigator · UHC Zagreb

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion