ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06274775Updated Jun 24, 2026

Effect of an Educational Nail Biopsy Video on Pre-operative Anxiety, Health Literacy, and Patient Satisfaction

An interventional study of Educational Video in Anxiety, Literacy and Satisfaction, Patient, sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Primary conditionLiteracyRegistry: Anxiety DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Anxiety Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Literacy
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Literacy.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators are interested in studying the effect of an animated video depicting a nail biopsy procedure on the anxiety, health literacy, and satisfaction of participants recommended to undergo a nail biopsy procedure. The investigators hypothesize that the animated video will reduce preoperative anxiety, increase health literacy, and increase patient satisfaction in relation to nail biopsy procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety
  • Literacy
  • Satisfaction, Patient

Browse trials for

03

In context

Literacy Reclassified

201 studies on the registry are indexed under Literacy; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 124 across 170 interventional studies indexed under Literacy.

Browse Literacy studies →

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University is the lead sponsor of 892 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 123 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 94 (76%) have results posted.

Compared within Literacy, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anxiety Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients recommended to receive a nail procedure in our specialty nail clinic.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Educational Video Group

    Group A (intervention group), which will be shown an educational video about the nail biopsy procedure in addition to standard of care, which includes verbal information about the procedure and pre-operative and post-operative handouts with instructions provided via quick-response (QR) code.

    Other: Educational Video

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care Group

    Standard of care only, which includes verbal information about the procedure and pre-operative and post-operative handouts with instructions provided via quick-response (QR) code.

Interventions

  • OtherEducational Video

    Educational video about the nail biopsy procedure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anxiety, as measured by the State Trait Anxiety Inventory

    State Trait Anxiety Inventory uses a scale of 1-4 for each question, with 1 being "not at all" and 4 being "very much so." The maximum score is 80, and the minimum score is 20. Scores from 20-37 indicate "no or low anxiety," scores from 38-44 indicate "moderate anxiety," and scores from 45-80 indicate "high anxiety."

    Time frame: Immediately following nail biopsy consultation

  2. Anxiety, as measured by the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale

    The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale uses a Likert scale from 1-5. The questions focus on anxiety and the need for information, creating two separate sub-scores. This measure assesses the anxiety sub-score, which ranges from 4 to 20 (4 questions) A higher anxiety sub-score indicates a higher anxiety level.

    Time frame: Immediately following nail biopsy consultation

  3. Need for information, as measured by the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale

    The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale uses a Likert scale from 1-5. The questions focus on anxiety and the need for information, creating two separate sub-scores. This measure assesses the need for information sub-score, which ranges from 2 to 10 (2 questions). A higher need for information sub-score indicates a higher information requirement.

    Time frame: Immediately following nail biopsy consultation

  4. Health literacy, as measured by 4 domains of The Health Literacy Questionnaire

    Using 4 domains of the The Health Literacy Questionnaire, subjects will respond using a scale from "strongly disagree" (equivalent to 1 point on Likert scale) to "strongly agree" (equivalent to 4 points on Likert scale) or from "cannot do or always difficult" (equivalent to 1 point on Likert scale) to "always easy" (equivalent to 5 points on Likert scale). The maximum score is 86, the minimum score is 19. A higher score indicates higher health literacy, while a lower score indicates lower health literacy.

    Time frame: Immediately following nail biopsy consultation

  5. Patient satisfaction, as measured by a patient satisfaction survey

    The patient satisfaction survey uses a scale from "not at all" (equivalent to 1 on a Likert scale) to "very much" (equivalent to 4 on a Likert scale), or from "not acceptable" (equivalent to 1 on a Likert scale) to "Acceptable" (equivalent to 3 on a Likert scale). The maximum score is 27, the minimum score is 7, with a higher score indicating higher satisfaction, and a lower score indicating lower satisfaction.

    Time frame: Immediately following nail biopsy consultation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of video intervention for intervention participants, as measured by a qualitative feedback survey

    The qualitative survey focuses on themes of interest, understandability, video length, and whether 2D animation is an effective method to convey medical information.

    Time frame: Immediately following nail biopsy consultation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Weill Cornell Medicine
    New York, New York 10065, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee DK, Chang MJ, Desai AD, Lipner SR. Clinical and dermoscopic findings of benign longitudinal melanonychia due to melanocytic activation differ by skin type and predict likelihood of nail matrix biopsy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Oct;87(4):792-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.1165. Epub 2022 Jun 22. PubMed 35752275 ↗
  • Turkdogan S, Roy CF, Chartier G, Payne R, Mlynarek A, Forest VI, Hier M. Effect of Perioperative Patient Education via Animated Videos in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Feb 1;148(2):173-179. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.3765. PubMed 34967863 ↗
  • Hou H, Li X, Song Y, Ji Y, Sun M, Wang D, Jiao J, Qu J, Gu H. Effect of interactive, multimedia-based home-initiated education on preoperative anxiety inchildren and their parents: a single-center randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02055-7. PubMed 36977985 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2024 to primary completion in Jun 2026, 26 months.

Of 115 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Literacy, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 20. This study's 26 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 117 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 19.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 14, 2024
First posted
Feb 23, 2024
StartActual
Apr 2, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jun 4, 2026
CompletionActual
Jun 4, 2026
Last update
Jun 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06274775
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 23, 2024
Start date
Apr 2, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 4, 2026
Completion
Jun 4, 2026
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Study contacts

Shari R. Lipner, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Dermatology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion