An interventional study of Iodine gargle in The Retention of Iodine in Saliva Over the Time and The Comparison of Iodine in Saliva Between Gargle and Swab, sponsored by Chulalongkorn University. Completed at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-23.
Sponsored by Chulalongkorn University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
To compare the iodine remaining in saliva between gargle method and swab method
separate the participant in 2 groups group 1 use iodine gargle with gargle method, after 48 hours use iodine gargle with swab method group 2 use iodine gargle with swab method, after 48 hours use iodine gargle with gargle method The researcher will collect saliva before use iodine gargle and after use at time 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120 minutes
Chulalongkorn University is the lead sponsor of 312 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
the participant will use 0.2% iodine gargle with gargle method by hold in mouth 30 second and gargle 30 seconds after that spit out
Other: Iodine gargle
the participant will use 0.2 iodine gargle with swab method by the researcher apply on mouth 1 minute without spit out
Other: Iodine gargle
Iodine gargle 0.2 %
The rate of retention of iodine in saliva
The retention of iodine in saliva after get the gargle (show in percentage)
Time frame: 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes
The comparison of the retention of iodine between gargle and swab
The comparison of rate of retention of iodine in saliva between gargle and swab (show in percentage)
Time frame: 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Chulalongkorn University