CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06269809TACROMUpdated Mar 14, 2025

Temporary Artery Clipping for Robotically-assisted Myomectomy, a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants. and No temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants. in Fibroid Uterus, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Recruiting at 4 sites in 3 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-14.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of temporary clipping of the uterine artery and utero-ovarian ligament during robotically assisted myomectomy (RAM) for uterine fibroids. While RAM is increasingly used for myomectomy, bleeding control remains challenging. Temporary clipping of arteries has shown promise in conventional laparoscopy but has not been studied in RAM. This randomized controlled trial will assess primary endpoints such as estimated blood loss, need for transfusion, and hemoglobin drop, alongside secondary outcomes like complication rates and operation time.

Read the detailed description

Uterine fibroids, also known as myomas or leiomyomas, are benign smooth muscle neoplasms of the uterus. Uterine fibroids are the most common neoplasms affecting women of reproductive age (up to 70-80% at the age of 50)(1). As fibroids grow, they may induce clinical problems such as menorrhagia, abdominal pain, or infertility.(2,3) Removal of uterine fibroids (myomectomy) is a gynaecological surgical procedure performed most frequently through laparotomy or minimally invasive surgery such as conventional laparoscopic or robotically assisted surgery. Because of the straight-stick instruments with limited degree of freedom, the excision and suturing of the myoma can be rather cumbersome, not in the least because myomectomies may be associated with relatively profuse peri-operative bloodloss. Owing to its enhanced 3D vision and wristed instruments, robotically assisted surgery may be a more suitable surgical technique, especially in the case of multiple myomas, large myomas or posterior localization. Consequently, in recent years a gradual shift has been seen to the use of robotically assisted myomectomies.

However, control of the bleeding during a myomectomy can be a challenge, even in the hands of an experienced robotic surgeon. Various strategies have been developed to combat this scenario; including rectal or IV misoprostol, intramyometrial injection of bupivacaine with epinephrine or vasopressin, , tranexaminic acid IV or various ligation strategies. There is moderate quality evidence for some of these interventions. Recently, the use of clips to temporary occlude the uterine artery for myomectomy with conventional laparoscopy for prevention of blood loss was validated in several studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials. To enhance hemostasis, recent articles described a technique to temporary clip both the uterine artery and infundibulopelvic artery with conventional laparoscopy, also resulting in fewer intra-operative bleeding compared to no artery clipping. The possible benefit of these ligation technique has never been studied in the setting of robotically-assisted myomectomies. On the one hand, RAM may involve more complex cases due to myoma size, localization or multiple myomas, and on the other hand, bleeding control may also be better with robotic surgery. This makes a prediction of the usefulness of this technique difficult, in terms of reducing blood loss.

Estimated blood loss remains a difficult outcome to reliably quantify, especially when using only visual parameters. During RAM, often only suction is used, making the estimation easier in comparison to open surgery, for which a variety of compresses and suction is used. This study will work with multiple primary endpoints, combining estimated blood loss over 500 mL, the need for a peri-operative blood transfusion or a hemoglobin drop exceeding 2 g/dL.

Other secondary outcomes will include complication rate, the operation time, postoperative pain and the need for additional hemostatic measures. In the literature, the risk of changes in ovarian reserve is also investigated, however it proved not significant and this was only a theoretical risk in the context of temporary clipping the infundibulopelvic artery, which is the main blood supply of the ovary. In this study, which will involve temporary clipping the utero-ovarian ligmant, there is no risk for a decrease in ovarian reserve.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fibroid Uterus

Keywords

  • myomectomy
  • fibroid
  • myoma
  • blood loss
  • temporary artery clipping
  • hemostatic measures
03

In context

Leiomyoma

490 studies on the registry are indexed under Leiomyoma; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 82 is above the median of 62 across 345 interventional studies indexed under Leiomyoma.

Browse Leiomyoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 928 studies on the registry; 261 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants eligible for inclusion in this Trial must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
  2. Use of highly effective methods of birth control; defined as those that, alone or in combination, result in low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly; such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some IUDs, true sexual abstinence (i.e. refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the Trial treatment(s)) or commitment to a vasectomised partner.
  3. Female
  4. Age: 18-50 years
  5. Myomas, eligible for myomectomy, with the exclusion of FIGO 7-8 myomas.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants eligible for this Trial must not meet any of the following criteria:

  1. Any disorder, which in the Investigator's opinion might jeopardise the participant's safety or compliance with the protocol
  2. Any prior or concomitant treatment(s) that might jeopardise the participant's safety or that would compromise the integrity of the Trial
  3. Participation in an interventional Trial with an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device
  4. Patient refusal to participate in the Trial
  5. (Possible) malignancy
  6. any contra indication for a laparoscopic or robotic surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
82 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Temporary artery clipping

    Patients undergoing a robotically-assisted myomectomies, with temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.

    Procedure: Temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Patients undergoing a robotically-assisted myomectomies, without temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.

    Procedure: No temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.

Interventions

  • ProcedureTemporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.

    Temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligaments using laparoscopic clips/bulldog clamps, during robotically assisted myomectomy.

  • ProcedureNo temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.

    Robotically assisted myomectomy, for which no temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligaments

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peri-operative blood loss: Estimated blood loss

    Multiple primary endpoints will be used to asses the blood loss: - Estimated blood loss \>500 mL

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. Peri-operative blood loss: Hemoglobin drop perioperatively >2g/dL

    Multiple primary endpoints will be used to asses the blood loss: - Hemoglobin drop perioperatively \>2g/dL (difference between hemoglobin preoperatively and postoperatively)

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Peri-operative blood loss: Need for peri-operative blood transfusion

    Multiple primary endpoints will be used to asses the blood loss: - Need for peri-operative blood transfusion

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospitalisation time

    Number of postoperative nights the patient had to stay in the hospital.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Operation time in minutes

    Total surgical time, from the completion of anesthesia induction untill the end of surgery (in minutes)

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Number of patients with complications postoperatively, graded by Clavien Dindo classification

    The Clavien Dindo classification is a validated tool to quantitatively assess postoperative complications. Grade 0: No complications Grade 1: Any deviation from normal postoperative course, without requiring intervention Grade 2: Requiring pharmacological treatment Grade 3: Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade 4: Life-treathening complication requiring intermediate or intensive care Grade 5: Death of a patient

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Number of patients requiring secondary hemostatic measures

    Was there a need for non-routine hemostatic measures, such as: * Tranexamic acid * Misoprostol * Oxytocin * Embolisation * Local application of sealant patch or glue (e.g TachoSil or Tisseel) * Hysterectomy

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 of 4 sites recruiting
  • University Hospitals Leuven
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hopital Bichat
    Paris, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • Service de gynécologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes
    Rennes, France
    • Vincent Lavoué, MD, PhD · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Amsterdam UMC, locatie VUmc
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Williams VS, Jones G, Mauskopf J, Spalding J, DuChane J. Uterine fibroids: a review of health-related quality of life assessment. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):818-29. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.818. PubMed 16999637 ↗
  • Pritts, E. A., & Olive, D. L. (2012). When Should Uterine Fibroids Be Treated? Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-012-0010-y
  • Stewart EA, Cookson CL, Gandolfo RA, Schulze-Rath R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017 Sep;124(10):1501-1512. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14640. Epub 2017 May 13. PubMed 28296146 ↗
  • Aendekerk, S., Verguts, J., Housmans, S., & Timmerman, D. (2019). Implementing robotic assisted myomectomy in surgical practice - a retrospective cohort study. Gynecological Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-019-1059-7
  • Herrinton LJ, Raine-Bennett T, Liu L, Alexeeff SE, Ramos W, Suh-Burgmann B. Outcomes of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Conditions: Influence of Patient Complexity. Perm J. 2020;24:19.035. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.035. Epub 2019 Dec 18. PubMed 31905335 ↗
  • Winter ML, Leu SY, Lagrew DC Jr, Bustillo G. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Robot Surg. 2015 Dec;9(4):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0526-z. Epub 2015 Jul 30. PubMed 26530837 ↗
  • Kongnyuy EJ, Wiysonge CS. Interventions to reduce haemorrhage during myomectomy for fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 15;2014(8):CD005355. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005355.pub5. PubMed 25125317 ↗
  • Ji L, Jin L, Hu M. Laparoscopic Myomectomy with Temporary Bilateral Uterine Artery Occlusion Compared with Traditional Surgery for Uterine Myomas: Blood Loss and Recurrence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Mar-Apr;25(3):434-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Sep 21. PubMed 28943191 ↗
  • Vercellino G, Erdemoglu E, Joe A, Hopfenmueller W, Holthaus B, Kohler C, Schneider A, Hasenbein K, Chiantera V. Laparoscopic temporary clipping of uterine artery during laparoscopic myomectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Nov;286(5):1181-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2419-y. Epub 2012 Jun 20. PubMed 22714065 ↗
  • Hiratsuka D, Isono W, Tsuchiya A, Okamura A, Fujimoto A, Nishii O. The effect of temporary uterine artery ligation on laparoscopic myomectomy to reduce intraoperative blood loss: A retrospective case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2022 Aug 8;15:100162. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2022.100162. eCollection 2022 Aug. PubMed 36035234 ↗
  • Kim HC, Song T. Temporary simultaneous two-arterial occlusion for reducing operative blood loss during laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2114-2120. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6482-8. Epub 2018 Oct 17. PubMed 30334154 ↗
  • Coll S, Feliu S, Montero C, Pellise-Tintore M, Tresserra F, Rodriguez I, Barri-Soldevila PN. Evolution of laparoscopic myomectomy and description of two hemostatic techniques in a large teaching gynecological center. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Oct;265:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.023. Epub 2021 Aug 26. PubMed 34509877 ↗
  • Rothermel LD, Lipman JM. Estimation of blood loss is inaccurate and unreliable. Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):946-953. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Aug 17. PubMed 27544540 ↗
  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2. PubMed 19638912 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06269809
Lead sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Collaborators
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Bichat Hospital, Rennes University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2024
Start date
May 4, 2023
Primary completion
May 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 14, 2025

Study contacts

Stefan Timmerman, MD
Contact
stefan.timmerman@uzleuven.be
+3216348826
Wouter Froyman, MD, PhD
Contact
wouter.froyman@uzleuven.be
+3216344202
Wouter Froyman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion