CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06264245COMPRESSEDUpdated Mar 3, 2025

Users of Remote Conferencing and Compression of Sound Dynamics : Auditory Effects

An observational study in Auditory Perception, sponsored by Institut Pasteur. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-03.

Sponsored by Institut Pasteur · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The COMPRESSED project is a descriptive, bi-centric and non-invasive study carried out by the CERIAH - IDA - Institut Pasteur and the Haute École Léonard de Vinci in Brussels on volunteer participants identified in two groups :

  • be subject to high exposure to compressed sound, as defined by professional participation in events on broadcast platforms using sound signal processing systems, over the last 3 years,
  • be subject to moderate or limited exposure to compressed and manipulated sound, equivalent to that of a student following certain distance learning courses. on a videoconferencing platform, alternating with other face-to-face courses, with the ability to listen during breaks, which have been taught for a maximum of 2 years.

The main objective of the COMPRESSED study is to evaluate the auditory effects of exposure to manipulated sounds (compression, filtering, equalisation, accentuation, etc.) from sound distribution platforms on the auditory system of participants who are regularly exposed to these sounds as a result of their professional activity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Auditory Perception
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Institut Pasteur is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Subjects with sustained exposure to compressed sounds, as defined by professional participation in broadcast platform events using sound signal processing systems, over the last 3 years, Or Subjects with moderate or limited exposure to compressed and manipulated sound, equivalent to that of a student taking distance-learning courses on a videoconferencing platform, alternating with other face-to-face courses, with the possibility of pauses in listening, exposed for a maximum of 2 years.

Inclusion criteria

For all participants:

  • Age 18 or over,
  • Work with platforms using sound signal processing systems,
  • Fluent in English,
  • Fluent in French,
  • Declare that they have no hearing loss.

For participants in the high exposure group:

  • Have had a professional activity over the last three years using broadcasting platforms with sound signal processing systems,

For participants in the moderate or limited exposure group:

  • Have worked between one semester and two years with platforms using sound signal processing systems.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conductive or mixed hearing loss, i.e. where the hearing loss affects both the outer and/or middle ear and the inner ear.
  • Have an asymmetric hearing loss, i.e. a difference in average hearing loss between the left and right ear of more than 20 dB,
  • Have a history of otitis and/or an ENT disease that permanently affects hearing (vestibular schwannoma, Ménière's disease, sudden or fluctuating deafness, congenital hypoacusis),
  • Not fluent in English
  • Be under guardianship,
  • Deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, or subject to legal protection.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • High exposure to compressed sound

    Other: Audiological profile · Other: Hearing self-assessments · Other: Objective and subjective audiological tests · Other: Self-assessment of exposure sound quality

  • Moderate or limited exposure to compressed sound

    Other: Audiological profile · Other: Hearing self-assessments · Other: Objective and subjective audiological tests · Other: Self-assessment of exposure sound quality

Interventions

  • OtherAudiological profile

    Video otoscopy Tympanometry High-frequency tonal audiometry

  • OtherHearing self-assessments

    Hearing skills questionnaire Subjective assessment of tinnitus using a visual analogue scale Self-questionnaire on the impact of tinnitus Hyperacusis self-questionnaire

  • OtherObjective and subjective audiological tests

    Acoustic Omission Measurement of the stapedial reflex by tympanometry High-frequency tonal audiometry - exposed ear only Speech audiometry in noise Tinnitus and subjective discomfort thresholds Psychoacoustic intensity perception test

  • OtherSelf-assessment of exposure sound quality

    A self-assessment of the sound quality of the manipulated sounds heard during the exhibition will be carried out during the second follow-up visit. The elements on which the participant will be asked to make a qualitative judgement will relate to intelligibility difficulties or not; background noise (these two items in the form of a mark between 0 and 10); the clear, muffled or shrill nature of the sounds, their resonant or saturated side.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hearing assessments of participants exposed to manipulated sounds after and before exposure

    Measurement of the difference between the hearing assessments of participants exposed to manipulated sounds after and before exposure

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Audiometric thresholds in pure tone from 125 to 8000 Hz in the subject's exposed ear before and approximately one hour after exposure,

    Measurement of the difference between audiometric thresholds in pure tone from 125 to 8000 Hz in the subject's exposed ear before and approximately one hour after exposure,

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. Difference between the threshold of the protective reflex of the auditory pathways (middle ear muscles) measured by impedancemetry in the exposed ear when a contralateral noise is presented for a few seconds.

    A contralateral noise is a low-pass filtered white noise with a cut-off at 3 kHz.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  3. Levels of otoemissions in acoustic distortion products in the exposed ear in response to pure tone sound stimuli

    Comparison of the levels of otoemissions in acoustic distortion products in the exposed ear in response to pure tone sound stimuli at 65 dB SPL around 1, 2, 3 and 4 kHz, before and approximately one hour after exposure.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  4. Tinnitus or auditory distortion (hyperacusis) reported by participants before and after exposure.

    Measurement of the difference in the perception of tinnitus or auditory distortion (hyperacusis) reported by participants before and after exposure.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  5. Effectiveness of the protective auditory reflexes (or acoustic reflexes), obtained by impedancemetry and derived from the reading of the otoemissions for each participant.

    Measurement of the difference of the effectiveness of the protective auditory reflexes (or acoustic reflexes), obtained by impedancemetry and derived from the reading of the otoemissions for each participant.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Haute Ecole Léonard De Vinci
    Bruxelles, Belgium
    Not yet recruiting
  • CEntre de Recherche et d'Innovation en Audiologie Humaine
    Paris, 75015, France
    • Paul Avan, MD · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06264245
Lead sponsor
Institut Pasteur
Collaborators
Institut de l'Audition
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 16, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 3, 2025

Study contacts

Céline Quinsac, PhD
Contact
celine.quinsac@pasteur.fr
+33 (0)1 76 53 50 29
Paul Avan, MD
Contact
paul.avan@uca.fr
+33 (0)1 76 53 50 94
Paul Avan, MD
principal investigator · CERIAH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion