CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06261801Updated Feb 21, 2025

Efficacy of Electroacupuncture Combined With Pregabalin in the Treatment of Trigeminal Herpetic Neuralgia: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol

An interventional study of Medication Group and EA Group in Trigeminal Herpetic Neuralgia, sponsored by The Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-21.

Sponsored by The Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Trigeminal herpetic neuralgia is a common type of Zoster-associated Pain (ZAP), which troubles individuals in all ages and burdens society all over the world. Eleactroaupuncture (EA) is increasingly used in the treatment of ZAP due to its advantages such as low price, high safety, no adverse reactions, and high patient acceptance. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of EA on ZAP and whether EA can be used as a substitute for pregabalin.

Read the detailed description

Trigeminal herpetic neuralgia is a common type of Zoster-associated Pain (ZAP), which troubles individuals in all ages and burdens society all over the world. Eleactroaupuncture (EA) is increasingly used in the treatment of ZAP due to its advantages such as low price, high safety, no adverse reactions, and high patient acceptance. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of EA on ZAP and whether EA can be used as a substitute for pregabalin.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trigeminal Herpetic Neuralgia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Electroacupuncture
  • pain
  • randomized controlled trial
  • protocol
03

In context

Neuralgia

1,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 256 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 102 is above the median of 52 across 973 interventional studies indexed under Neuralgia.

Browse Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

The Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. meet the aforementioned diagnostic criteria for trigeminal ZAP, with a disease duration of 1 to 3 months;
  2. have a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 4 points ≤ VAS ≤ 7 points;
  3. be between 18 and 85 years old, regardless of gender;
  4. have clear consciousness, the ability to distinguish pain, and complete basic communication;
  5. voluntarily participate in the study, sign a written informed consent form, and fully understand the plan.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. do not meet the above-mentioned inclusion criteria;
  2. have concomitant herpes zoster on the trunk or extremities, or other special types of herpes zoster like meningeal herpes zoster or visceral herpes zoster;
  3. are pregnant or lactating patients;
  4. are allergic to pregabalin or acupuncture stimulation;
  5. have severe organ damage, cognitive dysfunction, mental disorder, aphasia, or other serious diseases that hinder cooperation with treatment;
  6. have severe skin diseases;
  7. have a pacemaker;
  8. have been or are currently participating in other clinical studies within the past 3 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
102 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Medication Group

    Participants in the medication group would take 150-mg pregabalin capsules orally twice daily (total daily dose, 300 mg) for 4 weeks. The follow-up period is 3 months.

    Other: Medication Group

  • Experimental
    EA Group

    The subjects in this group will receive 3 times per week, and 4 weeks of continuous intervention for a total of 12 times. The follow-up period is 3 months.

    Other: EA Group

  • Experimental
    EA+Medication Group

    The subjects in this group will receive 3 times per week, and 4 weeks of continuous intervention for a total of 12 times. The intervention including electroacupuncture(EA) treatment and combined with pregabalin (0.15g each time, twice daily). The follow-up period is 3 months.

    Other: EA+Medication Group

Interventions

  • OtherMedication Group

    Participants in the medication group would take 150-mg pregabalin capsules (manufactured by Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd) orally twice daily (total daily dose, 300 mg) for 4 weeks.

  • OtherEA Group

    Acupoints selection: Ashi acupoint, Sibai acupoint (ST2), Xiaguan acupoint (ST7), and Dicang acupoint (ST4) on the affected side. Acupoints for the diseased branches (all taken from the affected side): eye branch and Tongziliao point (GB1), the maxillary branch is taken from the Quanliao point (SI18), and the mandibular branch is taken from the Jiache point (ST6).Shenting point (DU24), Baihui point (DU20), Hegu point (LI4), Waiguan point (TE5), Yanglingquan point (GB34), and Taichong point (LR3) on the affected side Operation: The EA apparatus will be applied on the Ashi point and (LI4 - TE5). The treatment will last for 30 minutes and the electrical stimulation will be set as 2/100Hz in frequency.

  • OtherEA+Medication Group

    Participants in the EA+Medication group would receive both EA and medical treatement. The acupoints and their location, needles, the settings of the EA device are the same as EA Group's; in the meanwhile, the medication and its dosage is the same as Medication Group's.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Score change

    Intensity of pain range (lately 3 days' average): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain.

    Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)

Secondary outcomes

  1. McGill Pain Questionnaire Short Form (SF-MPQ)

    SF-MPQ focuses on the characteristics, intensity, syndrome and changes of pain during treatment without taking too much time, so it can sensitively reflect clinical changes and reflect the effectiveness of treatment.

    Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)

  2. Brief Pain Inventory Scale (BPI-SF)

    BPI-SF includes descriptive words such as the cause of pain, nature of pain, impact on life, and location of pain, which are used to describe the degree of pain and evaluate pain in various aspects.

    Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)

  3. Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)

    The MOS-SS consists of 12 items related to sleep quality over a 4-week recall period.

    Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)

  4. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)

    HAMA will be used to assess the anxiety status of the participants

    Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)

  5. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)

    HAMD will be used to assess the depression status of the participants

    Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)

  6. Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)

    The SF-36 is a questionnaire with proven reliability and validity and is widely used to assess people's quality of life.

    Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The Hangzhou Third People's Hospital
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
    • Pin Lin · Contact · yjlp1@163.com · 1358876268686
    • Chengcheng Kong · Contact · 8613868078286
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Werner RN, Nikkels AF, Marinovic B, Schafer M, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Agius AM, Bata-Csorgo Z, Breuer J, Girolomoni G, Gross GE, Langan S, Lapid-Gortzak R, Lesser TH, Pleyer U, Sellner J, Verjans GM, Wutzler P, Dressler C, Erdmann R, Rosumeck S, Nast A. European consensus-based (S2k) Guideline on the Management of Herpes Zoster - guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), Part 2: Treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Jan;31(1):20-29. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13957. Epub 2016 Nov 2. PubMed 27579792 ↗
  • Johnson RW, Rice AS. Clinical practice. Postherpetic neuralgia. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1526-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1403062. No abstract available. PubMed 25317872 ↗
  • Wood M. Understanding pain in herpes zoster: an essential for optimizing treatment. J Infect Dis. 2002 Oct 15;186 Suppl 1:S78-82. doi: 10.1086/342958. PubMed 12353191 ↗
  • Kawai K, Gebremeskel BG, Acosta CJ. Systematic review of incidence and complications of herpes zoster: towards a global perspective. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 10;4(6):e004833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004833. PubMed 24916088 ↗
  • Gan EY, Tian EA, Tey HL. Management of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013 Apr;14(2):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s40257-013-0011-2. PubMed 23456596 ↗
  • Oster G, Harding G, Dukes E, Edelsberg J, Cleary PD. Pain, medication use, and health-related quality of life in older persons with postherpetic neuralgia: results from a population-based survey. J Pain. 2005 Jun;6(6):356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.359. PubMed 15943957 ↗
  • Dubinsky RM, Kabbani H, El-Chami Z, Boutwell C, Ali H; Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter: treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: an evidence-based report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2004 Sep 28;63(6):959-65. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000140708.62856.72. PubMed 15452284 ↗
  • Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Kent J, Mackey SC, Raja SN, Stacey BR, Levy RM, Backonja M, Baron R, Harke H, Loeser JD, Treede RD, Turk DC, Wells CD. Interventional management of neuropathic pain: NeuPSIG recommendations. Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2249-2261. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jun 6. PubMed 23748119 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06261801
Lead sponsor
The Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou
Collaborators
The Third Affiliated hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
Responsible party
Ling Pin (Chief physician, The Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 15, 2024
Start date
Feb 7, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 20, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 21, 2025

Study contacts

Pin Lin
Contact
yjlp1@163.com
1358876268686
Chengcheng Kong
Contact
njmukcc@163.com
8613868078286
Pin Lin
study director · The Hangzhou Third People's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion