CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06256133Updated Feb 13, 2024

Impact of Anesthesia-related Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Components on Mortality After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

An observational study in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Mortality, sponsored by Asan Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-13.

Sponsored by Asan Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
355
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), one of the most complex and invasive abdominal surgeries, is associated with long length of stay (LOS) and high morbidity and mortality rates. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is gaining popularity because it reduces surgical stress and promotes physiological stability through standardized perioperative care, thereby improving the recovery process and outcomes after surgery.

ERAS is a comprehensive approach to perioperative care that involves the collaboration of multiple departments. Within the ERAS program, components primarily implemented by the anesthesiology department include preoperative carbohydrate loading, maintenance of near-zero fluid balance, and multimodal analgesic management, such as midthoracic epidural block. However, they may be underutilized for several reasons, such as deviation from conventional methods (e.g., preoperative carbohydrate loading) or the highly demanding nature of the procedures, which require significant human resources, specialized equipment, and time (e.g., thoracic epidural or transverse abdominis block).

Several randomized trials involving patients undergoing PD have reported that the implementation of ERAS has provided high-level evidence on a safer and quicker recovery, with decreased morbidity rates and shorter LOS than traditional care. Furthermore, a recent study on colorectal surgery reported that the ERAS program may improve not only short-term but also long-term oncological outcomes. However, there is a paucity of research investigating the effects of ERAS on mortality after PD. Furthermore, the impact of anesthesiology-related components within the ERAS pathway has not been extensively studied.

A previously published randomized controlled trial from our institution showed that the outcomes after applying pre- and postoperative ERAS protocols without anesthesiology-related components (Surg-ERAS) were comparable to those of the conventional protocol. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term mortality rates among patients undergoing PD by examining the same cohort from a previous study, including the conventional (Non-ERAS) and Surg-ERAS groups, in addition to anesthesia fully implementing ERAS programs (ANS-Surg-ERAS group). Moreover, LOS; inflammation parameters, such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR); morbidity rate, reoperation rate, and readmission rate were compared among the three groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Mortality

Keywords

  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Mortality
  • Anesthesia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Asan Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 562 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery initiated the ERAS program without collaborating with the anesthesiology department. Data for 247 patients receiving conventional and Surg-ERAS were extracted from the previous trial from March 2015 to May 2017. Since then, emphasis on the multidisciplinary aspect of the ERAS program has increased, leading to the involvement of the Department of Anesthesiology. From the start of the ERAS collaboration in July 2018, clinical data, including protocol adherence and clinical outcomes, have been prospectively recorded. Subsequently, 355 patients were included and followed up for at least 2 years to assess the relationship between different ERAS bundles and mortality.

Eligibility criteria

  • The inclusion cirteria: The participants for this study comprised patients who were enrolled in the previous trial and those who met the same recruitment criteria, except for the inclusion of the ERAS protocol.

    *the previous trial: Hwang DW, Kim HJ, Lee JH, Song KB, Kim MH, Lee SK, Choi KT, Jun IG, Bang JY, Kim SC: Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program on pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 2019; 26:360-9

  • The exclusion criteria were as follows: distant metastasis, recurred periampullary cancer, active or uncontrolled infectious disease, severe psychological or neurological disease, alcohol or drug addiction, overlapping with other clinical trials, pregnancy, uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease, comorbidities that could affect the quality of life and nutritional status (e.g., liver cirrhosis and renal failure), a history of major abdominal surgery (e.g., gastric resection or colonic resection), the need for simultaneous adjacent organ resection (e.g., portal vein, superior mesenteric vein, transverse colon, and liver), and plan to perform minimally invasive PD.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
355 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • ANS-Surg-ERAS group

    fully implementing ERAS pathway including anesthesiology-related components

    Procedure: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol

  • Surg-ERAS group

    preoperative and postoperative ERAS protocol without anesthesiology-related components

  • Conventional group

    non-ERAS group

Interventions

  • ProcedureEnhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol

    Preoperative oral carbohydrate loading, Ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural catheter placement, Intraoperative individualized goal-directed fluid therapy, Active warming techniques, The inspired fractional concentration of oxygen was maintained, Multimodal postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prevention strategies, Anesthesia was maintained using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil, Scheduled administration of an intravenous (IV) or oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (50 mg of dexketoprofen)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Short- and long-term mortality

    The short- (180 days) and long-term (2 years) mortality rates among the three groups

    Time frame: 180days and 2years (March 2015 to February 2022)

Secondary outcomes

  1. ERAS protocol adherence

    Adherance rate of included ERAS protocol components

    Time frame: Pre-, intraop-, postoperative (during hospitalization) (March 2015 to February 2022)

  2. Length of stay

    the number of days from the date of surgery to the date of discharge

    Time frame: Postoperative, through study completion (March 2015 to February 2022)

  3. Morbidity rate

    Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), and postpancreatic hemorrhage (PPH), pulmonary complication, acute kidney injury

    Time frame: Within 3 months after surgery (March 2015 to February 2022)

  4. Re-operation rate

    Re-operation rate

    Time frame: Within 30days after surgery (March 2015 to February 2022)

  5. Re-admission rate

    Re-admission rate

    Time frame: Within 30days after surgery (March 2015 to February 2022)

  6. Inflammatory parameters

    neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR)

    Time frame: On the day before surgery and postoperative day 7 ((March 2015 to February 2022)

  7. Weight change

    comparing the largest difference between baseline body weight before surgery and weight on postoperative days 30 and 60.

    Time frame: Pre- and Postoperative(postoperative days 30 and 60) (March 2015 to February 2022)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Asan Medical Center
    Seoul, 05505, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The dataset used and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06256133
Lead sponsor
Asan Medical Center
Responsible party
Hyemee Kwon (Assistant professor, Asan Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 13, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2015
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2022
Completion
Feb 1, 2022
Last update
Feb 13, 2024

Study contacts

Hyemee Kwon, M.D, Ph.D
principal investigator · Asan Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion