CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06237608Updated Mar 6, 2024

Acceptability and Feasibility of an Adapted DBT-informed Skills Group for Gender Diverse Young People Co-delivered in a Charity Setting

A Phase 1 interventional study of Dialectical behavioural therapy (DBT)-informed skills group in Emotional Regulation, sponsored by King's College London. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-06.

Sponsored by King's College London · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2024, 2 years 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
16 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Gender diverse (e.g. trans or non-binary) young people are at higher risk of self-harm and may be more likely to access support through gender-diverse-specific 3rd sector charities. Dialectical behavioural therapy (DBT) is a transdiagnostic intervention targeting emotion dysregulation, self-harm and suicidality and is recommended by best-practice clinical guidelines; There is developing evidence that DBT skills training can be offered as an effective stand-alone intervention.The current study, therefore, aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and early indicators of effectiveness of a DBT-informed skills group intervention in a gender diverse charity setting. The intervention will be co-facilitated with a gender-diverse support worker from the charity to develop the therapeutic skills of the charity staff working with the young people, whilst they provide specialist knowledge and valuable lived experience.

Research questions

  1. Is the intervention feasible to deliver in a charity setting?
  2. Is the intervention acceptable to participants and charity facilitators?

Participants will attend a 16-week group intervention. They will complete questionnaire to assess acceptability at the end of the intervention. Attrition rates, training time, and questionnaires will be used to assess feasibility. Outcome measures will also be completed by the participants every three weeks to indicate possible effectiveness of the intervention. The outcomes will include emotion dysregulation, coping skills, anxiety, depression and suicidal behaviours.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emotional Regulation

Keywords

  • emotional regulation
  • gender diverse
03

In context

Lead sponsor

King's College London is the lead sponsor of 506 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 16-25 years old
  • Identify as gender diverse
  • Receiving support from Gendered Intelligence
  • Support worker identified and self-report emotion regulation difficulties.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In acute crisis at point of recruitment and start of the intervention such as active suicidal ideation with active plans, or severe self-harm requiring intensive interventions such as inpatient or crisis care.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Attend DBT-informed skills group intervention

    Behavioral: Dialectical behavioural therapy (DBT)-informed skills group

Interventions

  • BehavioralDialectical behavioural therapy (DBT)-informed skills group

    16 week 1.5hr DBT-informed skills group facilitated by the lead researcher and two charity facilitators

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of intervention

    1. Short, bespoke feedback questionnaire completed at the end of each session regarding content and delivery.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  2. Acceptability of intervention

    2. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire will be completed post-intervention.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  3. Feasibility of intervention

    1. Eligibility rates at screening

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  4. Feasibility of intervention

    2. Attrition rates at each stage of recruitment - initial number of participants identified by Gendered Intelligence, number of participants approached, number of participants who consented to discuss the project with the researcher, number of participants who consented to take part, number of participants who completed treatment.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  5. Feasibility of intervention

    3. Attendance and completion rates of the intervention 4. Cost and time to train a charity support worker 5. Number of clinician hours to deliver the intervention and outcome monitoring 6. Number of hours from charity to deliver the intervention 7. How feasible the intervention was to attend (via self-report questionnaire) 8. How feasible the intervention was to deliver (via self-report questionnaire completed by the co-facilitators)

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  6. Feasibility of intervention

    4. Cost and time to train a charity support worker

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  7. Feasibility of intervention

    5. Number of clinician hours to deliver the intervention and outcome monitoring 6. Number of hours from charity to deliver the intervention 7. How feasible the intervention was to attend (via self-report questionnaire) 8. How feasible the intervention was to deliver (via self-report questionnaire completed by the co-facilitators)

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  8. Feasibility of intervention

    6. Number of hours from charity to deliver the intervention

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  9. Feasibility of intervention

    7. How feasible the intervention was to attend (via self-report questionnaire) 8. How feasible the intervention was to deliver (via self-report questionnaire completed by the co-facilitators)

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  10. Feasibility of intervention

    8. How feasible the intervention was to deliver (via self-report questionnaire completed by the co-facilitators)

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Emotion dysregulation

    The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Higher scores indicate more severe emotion dysregulation difficulties.

    Time frame: Every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, and then every three weeks for 16 weeks once the intervention begins.

  2. Use of DBT coping skills

    The DBT Ways of Coping Checklist

    Time frame: Every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, and then every three weeks for 16 weeks once the intervention begins.

  3. Anxiety

    Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.

    Time frame: Every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, and then again after 16 weeks.

  4. Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.

    Time frame: Every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, and then again after 16 weeks.

  5. Internalised transphobia

    Gender Minority Stress and Resilience Measure. Higher scores indicate higher internalised transphobia.

    Time frame: Every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, and then every three weeks for 16 weeks once the intervention begins.

  6. Gender-related negative future expectations

    Gender Minority Stress and Resilience Measure. Higher scores indicate higher gender-related negative future expectations.

    Time frame: Every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, and then again after 16 weeks.

  7. Gender-related community connectedness

    Gender Minority Stress and Resilience Measure. Higher scores indicate higher gender-related community connectedness.

    Time frame: Every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, and then every three weeks for 16 weeks once the intervention begins.

  8. Gender-specific pride

    Gender Minority Stress and Resilience Measure. Higher scores indicate higher gender-specific pride

    Time frame: Every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, and then every three weeks for 16 weeks once the intervention begins.

  9. Suicidal behaviours

    Frequencies of self-harm, suicidal behaviours, A\&E attendances, and inpatient bed days.

    Time frame: Every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, and then every three weeks for 16 weeks once the intervention begins.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • King's College London
    London, SE5 8AN, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06237608
Lead sponsor
King's College London
Collaborators
Gendered Intelligence
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 1, 2024
Start date
Feb 3, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 6, 2024

Study contacts

Megan Stock
principal investigator · King's College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion