CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06229613AEROPLEXUpdated Feb 6, 2025

Exhaled Breath Aerosol for the Etiological Diagnosis of Respiratory Tract Infections: a Pilot Study

An observational study in Respiratory Diseases, sponsored by Ospedale San Raffaele. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-06.

Sponsored by Ospedale San Raffaele · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pilot study for the evaluation of the feasibility of pathogen detection in exhaled breath aerosols (XBAs) samples using the AveloCollect device.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of XBA collection and molecular detection of respiratory pathogens using the AveloCollect BlowTube device (index test) in subjects with a clinical presentation consistent with a respiratory infectious disease, compared to the same molecular assays performed on nasopharyngeal secretions (using commercially available swabs) and sputum (comparator tests).

Read the detailed description

Respiratory infections have a significant impact in terms of morbidity and mortality, both in the EU and globally and were responsible for the majority of pandemics in the last centuries. Human breath is an attractive sample type, given the ease of sample collection via non-invasive methods, its direct link to the route of transmission, and its potential role as an indicator of infectiousness. In particular, recent studies have focused on the exhaled breath aerosols (XBAs). Aerosol transmission was demonstrated for many respiratory infections, including pandemic influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), tuberculosis (TB) and COVID-19. Pathogen detection in XBA samples has shown a good sensitivity, but currently available research tools are highly technical and resource demanding. New and simplified XBA collection devices (Face masks, AveloCollect Blow tube device) are currently under evaluation, and further clinical studies are needed in order to assess their feasibility for pathogen detection in clinical practice, especially for etiological diagnosis in patients with unspecific respiratory symptoms.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of XBAs collection and analysis (index test) using the molecular tests currently in use at San Raffaele Hospital for the detection of respiratory pathogens in clinical samples, compared to upper respiratory secretion and sputum samples, that will be collected using standard procedures and analysed using the same kits (comparator tests).

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Diseases

Keywords

  • respiratory infection
  • exhaled breath aerosols (XBAs)
  • XBA collection devices
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 240 across 2,136 observational studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Ospedale San Raffaele is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Healthcare workers with fever, cough, sore throat, dyspnea, rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis will be enrolled

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult age (≥18 years)
  • Subjects with one or more symptoms of respiratory tract infection (fever, cough, sore throat, dyspnea, conjunctivitis and/or rhinitis).
  • Samples collected within 3 days from symptom onset.
  • No antibiotic drug taken during the previous 3 days

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Samples collected after 3 days from symptom onset.
  • Antibiotic drug taken during the previous 3 days
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
5 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • Devicemedical device for exhaled breath aerosols (XBAs) collection

    To evaluate the feasibility of XBAs collection and analysis (index test) using the molecular tests currently in use at San Raffaele Hospital for the detection of respiratory pathogens in clinical samples, compared to upper respiratory secretion and sputum samples, that will be collected using standard procedures and analysed using the same kits (comparator tests).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the feasibility of XBAs collection and analysis (index test) using the molecular tests currently in use

    Descriptive analyses will be carried out. The samples will undergo molecular analysis in order to detect respiratory pathogens, using the tests currently in use at San Raffaele Hospital for detection of respiratory pathogens in clinical samples.

    Time frame: 8 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit
    Milan, 20132, Italy
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06229613
Lead sponsor
Ospedale San Raffaele
Responsible party
Daniela Maria Cirillo (Head Emerging Bacterial Pathogens, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 29, 2024
Start date
May 15, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2024
Completion
Dec 12, 2024
Last update
Feb 6, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion