ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06227065POLOUpdated Sep 18, 2026

Precise Chemoresection in Low-grade NMIBC Using Drug Screens in Patient-derived Organoids

A Phase 2 interventional study of Epirubicin and Mitomycin in Bladder Cancer, Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer and Low Grade, sponsored by Hospital Centre Biel/Bienne. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Primary conditionNon-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsRegistry: Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms, a narrower term within Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Hospital Centre Biel/Bienne · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Based on the unmet clinical need to reduce invasiveness of treatment of low grade NMIBC, the investigators conduct this prospective, open label, single arm and single center phase II trial. The investigators aim to use drug screens in PDOs to guide neoadjuvant intravesical instillation therapy with either Epirubicin, Mitomycin C, Gemcitabine or Docetaxel to achieve chemoresection NMIBC.

Read the detailed description

Bladder cancer is a disease of the elderly patient and related to several interventions and operations. Patients with a low risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are treated by transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT). Due to the high recurrence rate of approximately 50% within 2 years of diagnosis, patients are followed in outpatient clinic by cystoscopy for at least 5 years.

Beside recurrence of low grade NMIBC to low grade disease, progression to higher grade or stage is infrequent to rare. Therefore, expectant management and actives surveillance seems to be an option for selected patients that are unfit for surgery. Moreover, intravesical chemoresection has been attempted in order to avoid surgery. However, all patients were treated with the same chemotherapeutic agent and anticipated response rates were missed.

At least four different drugs have been used in daily routine and/or clinical trials for instillation therapies in NMIBC. Namely, Epirubicin, Mitomycin C, Gemcitabine and Docetaxel have been investigated and administered.

The molecular landscape of NMIBC is heterogeneous. Not only the mutational pattern but also the transcriptomic characteristics vary between different NMIBC. Although different agents are used on a routine daily bases and in clinical trials, they have not been administered based on the molecular landscape or biological likelihood of response.

The investigators recently developed a pipeline for the generation of patient derived organoids (PDO) in NMIBC. In brief: The bladder cancer is sampled during TURBT. Generation of organoids has been carefully optimized in order to yield high viability from each sample. Beside confirmation of similarities of the molecular landscape between parental NMIBC and subsequent PDO (in approx. 30 samples), the investigators established a standardized protocol to perform drug screens on these PDOs.

In this trial (POLO Trial) the investigators aim to generate PDOs from bladder cancer biopsies that are harvested in the outpatient clinic. Subsequent drug screen in PDOs for Epirubicin, Mitomycin C, Gemcitabine and Docetaxel will identify the most effective agent in this given patient. Prior TURBT, patient will receive 6 intravesical instillations with the identified agent as neoadjuvant treatment in order to perform chemoresection of the tumor. Three months after initial diagnosis, TURBT will be performed as the standard treatment and to confirm response rate of precise chemoresection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
  • Low Grade

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Patient derived organoids
  • Neoadjuvant chemoresection
  • Precise drug selection
03

In context

Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms Reclassified

294 studies on the registry are indexed under Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms; 126 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 28 is below the median of 62 across 231 interventional studies indexed under Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms.

Browse Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Centre Biel/Bienne is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Compared within Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Urinary Bladder Neoplasms. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Signed Form
  2. Age ≥ 18 years
  3. Primary or recurrent NMIBC suspected to be low-grade or maximum G2 with a negative urine cytology

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Anticoagulation other than acetylsalicylic acid
  2. Evidence of significant uncontrolled concomitant disease that could affect compliance with the protocol as judged by the investigator
  3. Severe infection within 4 weeks prior to the date of the patient's signature
  4. for frequent catheterization
  5. Pregnancy or nursing. Female subject of (defined as premenopausal women who have not undergone surgical sterilization and are sexually active with a male part-ner) must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening
  6. Female subject of childbearing potential who is unwilling to use effective method(s) from the start of the intravesical instillation with the IMP until six months after the last instillation
  7. Male subject who is unwilling to use an effective contraception method from the start of the intravesical instillation with the IMP until four months after the last instillation
  8. Vulnerable individual, e.g., individual incapable of judgement or currently incarcerated or oth-erwise institutionalized (prisoner), or refugee
  9. Concomitant participation in another interventional clinical trial with an active treatment within 4 weeks prior to the date of the patient's informed consent signature and during the current trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Epirubicin

    Patients in that PDOs show highest response to this drug in-vitro will be treated with Epirubicin.

    Drug: Epirubicin

  • Experimental
    Mitomycin

    Patients in that PDOs show highest response to this drug in-vitro will be treated with Mitomycin.

    Drug: Mitomycin

  • Experimental
    Gemcitabine

    Patients in that PDOs show highest response to this drug in-vitro will be treated with Gemcitabine.

    Drug: Gemcitabine

  • Experimental
    Docetaxel

    Patients in that PDOs show highest response to this drug in-vitro will be treated with Docetaxel.

    Drug: Docetaxel

Interventions

  • In PDOs from patients that show highest response to Epirubicin, this drug will be instilled intravesically once weekly for 6 times. Epirubicin will be used as a concentrate for injection/instillation 2 mg/ml in total 50mg per vial. Prior to use, the concentrate for injection is diluted with 25ml of 0.9% saline solution to obtain the final Solution with 1mg/ml of Epirubicin.

  • In PDOs from patients that show highest response to Mitomycin, this drug will be instilled intravesically once weekly for 6 times. Mitomycin C will be used as 20mg dry powder. Prior to use, the powder will be dissolved in 50ml of 0.9% saline solution according to the manufacturer instructions

  • In PDOs from patients that show highest response to Gemcitabine, this drug will be instilled intravesically once weekly for 6 times. Gemcitabine will be used as 2000 mg/50ml. For intravesical application, 1000mg of gemcitabine (corresponding to 25ml) will be diluted in 25ml 0.9% saline solution, to obtain the gemcitabine concentration of 1000mg/50ml used for instillation.

  • In PDOs from patients that show highest response to Docetaxel, this drug will be instilled intravesically once weekly for 6 times. Docetaxel will be used as 140mg/7ml solution. For intravesical application, 48.825ml of saline will be added to 1.875ml Docetaxel solution (according 37.5mg of Docetaxel). The concentration of this solution is 0.74mg/ml by a total volume of the instillation solution of 50,7.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pathological response

    Rate of patients that show complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoresection

    Time frame: 15 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of drug screen

    Rate of patients in which drug screen in patient derived organoids was successful

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Safety of the study intervention

    Incidence, severity and type of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) which are defined as adverse events related to chemotherapeutic intravesical instillation. AESIs include dysuria, urinary tract infections, and complications due to catheterism for intravesical instillation such as urethral irritation and haematuria

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Number of patients with recurrence free survival

    Recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoresection and transurethral resection of the bladder tumor

    Time frame: 1 Year

  4. Tolerability of instillation

    Quality of life measured with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). It corresponds to a functional Scales \& Global Health Status; a higher score indicates a better outcome (a higher level of functioning or a better quality of life). The score minimum is 0 and maximum 100.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  5. Tolerability of instillation

    The quality of life is completed with a Symptom \& Concern Scale specific for NMIBC called European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 24-Item Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24). This Symptom \& Concern Scale has also a minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 100. A higher score indicates a worse outcome (a greater burden of symptoms or high symptomatology).

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After completion of the trial for the primary endpoint, deidentified data will be shared to other researches upon request.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: After completion of the trial to the primary endpoint.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Nov 2030, 47 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 17, 2024
First posted
Jan 26, 2024
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2030
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2031
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06227065
Lead sponsor
Hospital Centre Biel/Bienne
Collaborators
Spitalzentrum Biel, Lindenhofgruppe AG, Fond'action contre le cancer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2024
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Roland Seiler, Prof.
Contact
urologie@szb-chb.ch
+41 32 324 32 06
Martina Schneider
Contact
martina.schneider@szb-chb.ch
+41 323243217
Roland Seiler, Prof.
study chair · Spitalzentrum Biel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Epirubicin · Mitomycin · Gemcitabine · Docetaxel

Start the discussion