CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06210373Updated Sep 21, 2026

Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of the Use of Two Eye Gel Products Containing 5% Dexpanthenol in Patients With Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Syndrome

An interventional study of Myrialen Gel and Recugel in Dry Eye Disease, sponsored by Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a.. Completed at 3 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2022, registered Dec 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The prospective, multicentric, randomized, non-inferiority, controlled, open-label clinical investigation will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of Myrialen® gel vs.

Recugel®, two eye gel products containing 5% dexpanthenol, in patients with moderate to severe dry eye syndrome.

A total of 110 evaluable patients (55 in each treatment group), ≥18 years of age, will be required for data analysis. A total of 124 patients (62 in each treatment group) will be randomized to replace potential early withdrawals or non-evaluable patients.The primary objective of this investigation is to demonstrate non-inferior efficacy of Test Myrialen® gel over the Reference Recugel® in improving corneal and conjunctival surface state, assessed through slit lamp biomicroscopy examination, in patients with moderate to severe dry eye syndrome.

Read the detailed description

There is scarce documentation in literature on the effects of dexpanthenol in the management of DED. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that evaluated the effect of dexpanthenol-containing artificial tears in 50 patients with dry eyes, patients receiving the active ingredient had significant improvement of disturbances of the corneal epithelial permeability (as measured by fluorophotometry and Schirmer test, Rose Bengal staining, TFBUT), compared to the dexpanthenol-free eyes drops. Despite the scarce literature documentation, the use of 5% dexpanthenol, which stimulates the processes of reparative regeneration and possesses an anti-inflammatory effect, is actually considered as one of the promising directions in the management of patients with DED. Dexpanthenol has also been developed as a component of a contact lens system that controls its release as osmoprotectant and moisturizing agent with the aim to reduce symptoms of ocular dryness.

Based on this background, this investigation has been designed to compare the effects of the investigational device Myrialen® gel with another device containing 5% dexpanthenol, i.e. Recugel® eye gel, in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe dry eye syndrome. In particular, the main objective of this investigation is to demonstrate that the test device Myrialen®gel will be non-inferior to the reference device Recugel® in improving corneal and conjunctival surface state.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 192 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 125 is above the median of 60 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a. is the lead sponsor of 30 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient written informed consent to participate in the study obtained according to Good Clinical Practice (GCP);
  2. Male and female patients aged ≥18 years;
  3. Patients with new diagnosis of dry eye syndrome (according to Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society [TFOS] Dry Eye Workshop [DEWS] II definition), or previous diagnosis of dry eye syndrome not treated in the previous 15 days;
  4. Diagnosis of dry eye syndrome performed through the following exams: slit lamp examination (SLE), Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Living (IDEEL) questionnaire, tear (lacrimal) meniscus exam, Schirmer's test, Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT), fluorescein and lissamine green staining of the cornea and conjunctiva (respectively). In case of bilateral dry eye syndrome, only the worst eye, defined as the eye with the higher severity of impairment according to theInvestigator's judgment based on the above exams, will be considered for assessments (although both eyes will be treated). In the case of bilateral dry eye syndrome with both eyes having the same level of impairment, the right eye will be considered for assessments by convention;
  5. Sodium fluorescein and lissamine green staining score of the cornea and conjunctiva(respectively) ≥ 2 National Eye Institute (NEI) grid, defined as the sum of 5 areas per eye using a 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) scale) in the worst eye for the corneal staining and the sum of 6 areas per eye using a 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) scale in the worst eye for the conjunctival staining;
  6. A Schirmer test value \< 10 mm;
  7. A TFBUT value ≥ 5 sec;
  8. Patient able to comprehend the full nature and the purpose of the study, including possible risks and side effects, and subjects able to cooperate with the Investigator and to comply with the requirements of the entire study (including ability to attend all the planned study visits according to the time limits), based on Investigator's judgment;
  9. Females of childbearing potential (i.e., not permanently sterilised - post hysterectomy or tubal ligation status - or not postmenopausal for at least one year) must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at Screening and must use an appropriate method of contraception for at least 30 days before inclusion in the study and during the whole study period, according to the definition in ICH M3 Guideline:

A highly effective method is defined as that which results in a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly. Highly effective birth control methods include:

combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal); progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable); intrauterine device (IUD); intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS); bilateral tubal occlusion; vasectomised partner; sexual abstinence.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any ocular disease other than dry eye syndrome requiring treatment with ophthalmological topical medications with re-epithelizing, trophic, anti-infective or anti-inflammatory effect (e.g. antibiotics, corticosteroids, gel re-epithelizing, platelet-rich plasma, autologous serum, medication with vitamin A, hyaluronic acid-based products) in either eye at the time of study enrolment and in the previous 30 days;
  2. Any active ocular infection or active inflammation in either eye unrelated to dry eye syndrome;
  3. Presence or history of any systemic or ocular disorder, condition or disease (with particular attention to malignancies and neuro-oncological diseases) that, according to Investigator's judgment, can interfere with the conduct of the required study procedures or the assessment of the efficacy or the interpretation of the study results or the incidence of adverse events;
  4. Use of therapeutic or refractive contact lenses in either eye in the previous 20 days and at the time of study enrolment;
  5. History of ocular surgery in either eye, excluding corneal refractive or cataract procedures, within 90 days of study enrolment;
  6. Treatment with any other therapy that, according to Investigator's judgment, could interfere with the assessment of the efficacy or incidence of adverse events;
  7. Hypersensitivity and/or allergy to any of Myrialen® gel and/or Recugel® ingredients;
  8. Women pregnant or breastfeeding or women who could become pregnant and are not using effective contraception;
  9. Patients unlikely to comply with the protocol or unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the investigation;
  10. Participation in another clinical investigation within the past 30 days or previous enrolment in this investigation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
125 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Myrialen Gel Group

    Myrialen® gel: sterile ophthalmic gel containing 5% dexpanthenol

    Device: Myrialen Gel

  • Active comparator
    Recugel Group

    Recugel®: sterile ophthalmic gel containing 5% dexpanthenol

    Device: Recugel

Interventions

  • DeviceMyrialen Gel

    Myrialen Gel will be instilled as 1 drop per eye 3 times a day and one drop per eye before going to bed in the conjunctival sac for 30 days.In case of bilateral dry eye syndrome, both eyes will be treated. In case of monolateral dry eye syndrome, the decision to treat both eyes will be taken according to the Investigator's judgment.

    Also known as: Dexpanthenol 5%

  • DeviceRecugel

    Recugel will be instilled as 1 drop per eye 3 times a day and one drop per eye before going to bed in the conjunctival sac for 30 days. In case of bilateral dry eye syndrome, both eyes will be treated. In case of monolateral dry eye syndrome, the decision to treat both eyes will be taken according to the Investigator's judgment.

    Also known as: Dexpanthenol 5%

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy assessment through National Eye Institute (NEI) total score compared to baseline

    The NEI/Industry Workshop guidelines will be used as grading scale of the corneal and conjunctiva damage used. The cornea will be divided into five sectors (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal), each of which will be scored on a scale of 0-3, with a maximal score of 15. Both nasally and temporally, the conjunctiva will be divided into a superior paralimbal area, an inferior paralimbal area and a peripheral area with a grading scale of 0-3 and with a maximal score of 9 for the nasal and temporal conjunctiva.

    Time frame: Day 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy assessment through National Eye Institute (NEI) total score compared to baseline

    The NEI/Industry Workshop guidelines will be used as grading scale of the corneal and conjunctiva damage used. The cornea will be divided into five sectors (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal), each of which will be scored on a scale of 0-3, with a maximal score of 15. Both nasally and temporally, the conjunctiva will be divided into a superior paralimbal area, an inferior paralimbal area and a peripheral area with a grading scale of 0-3 and with a maximal score of 9 for the nasal and temporal conjunctiva.

    Time frame: Day 7

  2. Efficacy assessment through National Eye Institute (NEI) corneal score compared to baseline

    The NEI/Industry Workshop guidelines will be used as grading scale of the corneal and conjunctiva damage used. The cornea will be divided into five sectors (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal), each of which will be scored on a scale of 0-3, with a maximal score of 15.

    Time frame: Day 7 and Day 30

  3. Efficacy assessment through National Eye Institute (NEI) conjunctival score compared to baseline

    The NEI/Industry Workshop guidelines will be used as grading scale of the corneal and conjunctiva damage used. . Both nasally and temporally, the conjunctiva will be divided into a superior paralimbal area, an inferior paralimbal area and a peripheral area with a grading scale of 0-3 and with a maximal score of 9 for the nasal and temporal conjunctiva.

    Time frame: Day 7 and Day 30

  4. Assessment of Changes in impact of Dry Eye on Everyday living (IDEEL) questionnaire (symptom-bother and impact on daily life modules) from baseline

    The IDEEL is divided into different sectionsa and only two will be considered in patient evaluation. The "Dry Eye Symptom-Bother" module includes 20 items: Item 1 from 0 "none of the time" to 4 "all of the time"; Items 2-from 1 "not at all" to 4 "very much". Score 0="I did not have this symptom / Not applicable"; and the "Dry Eye Impact on Daily Life" module composed of 3 sections: dry eye on daily living activities (9 items), emotional impact (12 items) and impact on work (6 items).Items 1-9 are scored on a 5-point Likert-like scale from 1 "all of the time" to 5 "none of the time". Items 10-21, 23-27 are scored on a 5-point Likert-like scale from 0 "all of the time" to 4 "none of the time". Item 22 is scored on a dichotomous scale: 1 "Yes", 0 "No". This item is not included in the calculation of the scores.

    Time frame: Day 30

  5. Assessment of Changes in Tear-Film Break-Up Time from baseline

    The tear film is observed under cobalt-blue filtered light of the slit lamp biomicroscope and the time that elapses between the last blink and appearance of the first break in the tear film is recorded with a stopwatch (a break is seen as a dark spot in a sea of blue). TFBUT results of less than 10 seconds are consistent with dry eyes. The TFBUT will be measured twice during the first minute after the instillation of the fluorescein. If the 2 readings differ by more than 2 seconds a third reading will be taken. The TFBUT value will be the average of the 2 or 3 measurements.

    Time frame: Day 7 and Day 30

  6. Assessment of quantitative normalization of the tear film from baseline

    Change in Schirmer's Test values from baseline. The Schirmer's test measures the quantity of total tear secretion, including reflex and basal tears, produced by the eye. A 35 mm x 5 mm size filter paper strip is used to measure the amount of tears that are produced over a period of 5 minutes. The wet portion of the strip is measured in millimeters. The test is done under ambient light. The patient is instructed to look forward and to blink normally during the course of the test. Normal mean test values range from 8 mm to 33 mm, but an accepted normal value is greater than 10 mm. Patients with dry eyes have wetting values of less than 5 mm in 5 minutes.

    Time frame: Day 7 and Day 30

  7. Assessment of qualitative normalization of the tear film from baseline

    Changes will be evaluated through the tear meniscus height. The tear (lacrimal) meniscus examination is conducted using slit-lamp biomicroscopy (narrow slit and low intensity light) and observing the tear (lacrimal) meniscus height. Values are considered normal if within the 0.3 to 0.5-mm range.

    Time frame: Day 30

  8. Assessment of changes in visual acuity from baseline

    Visual function will be assessed by distance visual acuity measurement. Both uncorrected distance visual acuity (UNVA, vision with no extraocular optical correction) and best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA, defined as obtained with the best possible refractive correction) will be measured using the Snellen chart. Visual acuity values will be expressed in decimal, fraction or logMAR. All assessments will be performed using standard charts and procedures at specified visual angle, illumination and contrast. Current refraction will be determined prior to visual acuity testing to obtain best-corrected vision

    Time frame: Day 30

  9. Assessment of incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events

    Safety and tolerabiltiy will be assessed through the analysis of Incidence and nature of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs); Incidence and nature of Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) and serious ADEs (SADEs) during the entire investigation duration; Incidence and nature of Investigational Medical Device Deficiencies (IMDDs) during the entire investigation duration.

    Time frame: Day 30

Other outcomes

  1. Changes in confocal microscopy of density of dendritic cells from baseline

    The changes will be evaluated through the use of confocal microscopy. The density of dendritic cells at the level of the sub-epithelial basal membrane evaluated in the central cornea (number of cells/mm2) will be evaluated according to single-layer epithelium, two cellular layers evidenced, more than two cellular layers evidenced.

    Time frame: Day 30

  2. Changes in confocal microscopy in stratification of the epithelium from baseline

    The changes will be evaluated through the use of confocal microscopy. The stratification of the epithelium will be evaluated according to single-layer epithelium, two cellular layers evidenced, more than two cellular layers evidenced.

    Time frame: Day 30

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Università degli studi Federico II
    Naples, Napoli 80131, Italy
  • Ospdale SS.Annunziata-Università degli Studi G.d'Annunzio
    Chieti, Pescara 66100, Italy
  • Humanitas Gradenigo
    Torino, Torino 10153, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06210373
Lead sponsor
Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 18, 2024
Start date
Nov 16, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2024
Completion
Dec 20, 2024
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Leonardo Mastropasqua, MD
principal investigator · Ospedale SS. Annunziata- Università degli studi G. d'Annunzio-Chieti

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion