CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06206044Updated Nov 20, 2024

Evaluation of the Typical Spinal Block During Cesarean Delivery

An observational study in Cesarean Section and Anesthesia, Obstetric, sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 15 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-20.

Sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250
Ages
15 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This will be a prospective, observational, single-center study to evaluate the accuracy of sensory testing by blunt 16-gauge plastic cannula during the 15 minutes after spinal injection for predicting spinal failure. While previous studies assessed the minimal sensory level required for painless cesarean delivery at skin incision or delivery, no studies have assessed the accuracy of sensory testing at an earlier time point.

Read the detailed description

Primary Objective:

  1. Evaluate the accuracy of sensory testing with blunt plastic 16-gauge cannula during the 15 minutes after spinal injection for predicting spinal failure. Cephalad sensory dermatomal levels will be assessed at 1 (t1), 3 (t3), 5 (t5), 7 (t7), 9 (t9), 11 (t11), 13 (t13), and 15 (t15) minutes after intrathecal 1.6 ml 0.75% bupivacaine in 8.25% dextrose combined with 15 mcg fentanyl and 150 mcg morphine (study solution). Spinal failure, which is defined as inability to achieve a T4 level to pinprick by the 15-minute timepoint or intraoperative pain (VAS > 0) requiring treatment

Secondary Objectives:

  1. Conversion to another anesthetic technique (general anesthesia or activation of the epidural catheter)
  2. Inadequate anesthesia (analgesic supplementation with ketamine, > 20 mg propofol, > 2 mg midazolam, > 10 mg parental morphine equivalents, or intraperitoneal chloroprocaine).
  3. Patient satisfaction upon arrival to the postanesthesia care unit, rated on a 1-5 Likert scale

A sample size calculation

Population: 250 pregnant females undergoing non-emergency cesarean section delivery in the Labor \& Delivery Operating Rooms at Oregon Health \& Science University.

Number of Sites: Single center trial

Study Duration: Institutional Review Board approval has been obtained. Study initiation, enrollment, and data collection is expected to take 24 months. Data analysis, manuscript writing, editing, submission and revision to a peer-reviewed journal is expected to take an additional 6 months.

In summary, the study should be completed in under 3 years.

Subject Participation Duration: Total time of subject participation including time for recruitment, enrollment, data collection during the preanesthesia consult, and post-consult data collection will be less than 3 hours.

Estimated Time to Complete Enrollment: Estimated time from enrollment into study of the first subject to enrollment into study of the last subject is 24 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean Section
  • Anesthesia, Obstetric

Keywords

  • Spinal anesthesia
  • bupivacaine
  • Sensory dermatomal level
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Oregon Health and Science University is the lead sponsor of 676 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 49 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 36 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pregnant females receiving spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia
  • BMI between 20 and 40 kg/m2
  • Height between 5 feet 2 inches and 5 feet 10 inches.
  • English and non-English speaking patients, if interpretive services are available

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (coagulopathy, CNS pathology, infection at site of needle puncture)
  • Allergy to any study medications
  • Use of epidural anesthesia
  • Emergency (red) cesarean delivery
  • Conditions that impact dermatomal sensory testing including spinal cord injury with sensory deficits and abdominoplasty
  • Prison inmates
  • Decisionally impaired individuals
  • Pregnancies involving multiple fetuses
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Study Cohort

    Healthy pregnant women of BMI between 20 and 40 kg/m2, height between 5 feet 2 inches and 5 feet 10 inches, who are having cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia.

    Drug: Intrathecal 1.6 ml 0.75% bupivacaine in 8.25% dextrose combined with 15 mcg fentanyl and 150 mcg preservative-free morphine

Interventions

  • DrugIntrathecal 1.6 ml 0.75% bupivacaine in 8.25% dextrose combined with 15 mcg fentanyl and 150 mcg preservative-free morphine

    Patients will receive standard intrathecal medications for urgent and scheduled cesarean delivery at the study site. All study subjects will receive bupivacaine, fentanyl, and morphine.

    Also known as: Marcaine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with spinal failure

    A composite outcome that will be categorized as "yes" if there is either preoperative or intraoperative spinal failure. Preoperative failure will be defined as failure to achieve a T4 level to pinprick by the 15-minute timepoint. Intraoperative failure will be defined as pain (VAS \> 0) that requires anesthesia provider medication administration. Pain will be queried at time of skin incision, fetal delivery, uterine exteriorization, uterine interiorization or end of uterine closure, and end of skin closure. If VAS \> 0, the anesthesia provider will ask the patient if they would like analgesic medication. Discomfort at any other time during the cesarean delivery that is treated with neuraxial or intravenous analgesia will also count. Pain will be rated according to the scale: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable

    Time frame: 90 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with conversion to another anesthetic technique

    Conversion to general anesthesia or activation of the epidural catheter for intraoperative pain

    Time frame: 90 minutes

  2. Number of participants with inadequate anesthesia

    Analgesic supplementation with ketamine, \> 20 mg propofol, \> 2 mg midazolam, \> 10 mg parental morphine equivalents, or intraperitoneal chloroprocaine

    Time frame: 90 minutes

  3. Patient satisfaction assessed by 5-point Likert scale, minimum value=1, maximum value=5, with higher values representing better patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction upon arrival to the post-anesthesia care unit, rated on a 1-5 Likert scale with higher values representing better patient satisfaction

    Time frame: 2 Hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Oregon Health and Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kinsella SM. A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 Caesarean sections. Anaesthesia. 2008 Aug;63(8):822-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05499.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28. PubMed 18547291 ↗
  • Russell IF. A comparison of cold, pinprick and touch for assessing the level of spinal block at caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2004 Jul;13(3):146-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2003.12.007. PubMed 15321392 ↗
  • Ousley R, Egan C, Dowling K, Cyna AM. Assessment of block height for satisfactory spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2012 Dec;67(12):1356-63. doi: 10.1111/anae.12034. Epub 2012 Oct 12. PubMed 23061397 ↗
  • Hoyle J, Yentis SM. Assessing the height of block for caesarean section over the past three decades: trends from the literature. Anaesthesia. 2015 Apr;70(4):421-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.12927. Epub 2014 Nov 10. PubMed 25388969 ↗
  • Russell IF. Levels of anaesthesia and intraoperative pain at caesarean section under regional block. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1995 Apr;4(2):71-7. doi: 10.1016/0959-289x(95)82995-m. PubMed 15636981 ↗
  • de Souza Soares EC, Balki M, Downey K, Ye XY, Carvalho JCA. Assessment of sensory block during labour epidural analgesia: a prospective cohort study to determine the influence of the direction of testing. Can J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;69(6):750-755. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02228-x. Epub 2022 Mar 14. PubMed 35289377 ↗
  • Yentis SM. Height of confusion: assessing regional blocks before caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Jan;15(1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Oct 26. No abstract available. PubMed 16256334 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 15, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Due to patient data protection regulations within the study site there is not a plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers. Reasonable requests emailed to the PI will considered on a case-by-case basis.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06206044
Lead sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Responsible party
Brandon M Togioka (Principal Investigator, Oregon Health and Science University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 16, 2024
Start date
Jun 10, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 20, 2024

Study contacts

Brandon M Togioka, MD
principal investigator · Oregon Health and Science University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion