ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06201598pSPAIN_HPCUpdated Nov 22, 2024

Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Cerebral Aneurysms Using P64 and P48 Flow-Diverter Stents

An observational study in Cerebral Aneurysm and Thromboembolic Disease, sponsored by Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias. Recruiting at 11 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-22.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The use of flow-diverting stents for the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms has proven to be effective and efficient in several clinical studies, leading to its widespread adoption. Devices with a higher number of filaments have a greater flow-diverting effect and less variation when there are changes in the caliber of the underlying vessel or in curved vessels. However, ischemic complications secondary to their implantation have been reported, prompting the development of various strategies to reduce their thrombogenicity. Phenox is the only company to date that has developed an anti-thrombogenic coating, known as HPC (Hydrophilic Polymer Coating), which, when applied to the p64 MW HPC and p48 MW HPC devices, has shown to reduce the likelihood of thromboembolic complications associated with their implantation.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysms using the flow-diverting stents p64MW (flow modulation device) HPC and p48MW HPC in the routine clinical practice of several Spanish hospitals. It is therefore an observational study, carried out with devices already commercialized. The success rate of the intervention, the rate of hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications, as well as variables related to the clinical and radiological follow-up of patients over a 12-month period, will be analyzed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Aneurysm
  • Thromboembolic Disease

Keywords

  • Cerebral aneurysm
  • Flow-diverting stents
  • Thrombogenicity
  • p64 MW HPC
  • p48 MW HPC
03

In context

Intracranial Aneurysm

418 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Aneurysm; 119 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 200 across 191 observational studies indexed under Intracranial Aneurysm.

Browse Intracranial Aneurysm studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study will include all patients with intracranial aneurysms or dissections suitable for endovascular treatment with a flow-diverting device, who attend the participating hospitals.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 18 years old with incidental, symptomatic, and/or ruptured cerebral aneurysms.
  • Signed by the patient or their representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years of age.
  • Absence of signed by the patient or their representative.
  • Known, medically untreatable allergy to iodinated contrast.
  • Pregnant women or those breastfeeding.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients treated with p64MW HPC and p48MW HPC

    Patients with intracranial aneurysms or dissections undergoing endovascular treatment with p64MW HPC and p48MW HPC flow-diverting devices.

    Device: Group 1 - Intervention 1

Interventions

  • DeviceGroup 1 - Intervention 1

    Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms through the implantation of p64MW HPC and p48MW HPC devices.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness objective

    Evaluation of the effectiveness of treating cerebral aneurysms with p64MW HPC and p48MW HPC devices in several Spanish hospitals.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Safety Objective

    Evaluation of the safety of treating cerebral aneurysms with p64MW HPC and p48MW HPC devices in several Spanish hospitals.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intervention success

    Rate of the ability to position the stent in the indicated location.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  2. Thromboembolic complications

    Rate of cerebral thromboembolic complications during the intervention and during patient follow-up.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Hemorrhagic complications

    Rate of cerebral and systemic hemorrhagic complications during the intervention and during patient follow-up.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Mortality

    Mortality rate during patient follow-up.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Clinical evolution of the patient using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS).

    NIHSS at 24 hours and at discharge (range 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater stroke severity). MRS at 24 hours, at discharge, at 4-6 months and 12 months post-treatment (range 0-6, from no symptoms to dead, for the evaluation of neurological functional disability).

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Intimal hyperplasia

    Rate of intimal hyperplasia within the stent leading to a luminal stenosis of over 50%, assessed through digital angiography at 4-6 months and 12 months post-treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Thromboembolic complications with a single antiplatelet drug

    Rate of thromboembolic complications during the intervention and patient follow-up in cases where a single antiplatelet drug is administered.

    Time frame: 1 year

  8. Intimal hyperplasia with a single antiplatelet drug

    Rate of intimal hyperplasia within the stent leading to a luminal stenosis of over 50% in cases where a single antiplatelet drug is administered, assessed through digital angiography at 4-6 months and 12 months post-treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Visible ischemic complications

    Rate of visible ischemic complications in MRI during patient follow-up (4-6 months).

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Aneurysm occlusion

    Aneurysm occlusion rate assessed through digital angiography at 6 and 12 months post-intervention, according to the O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) occlusion scale.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

11 of 11 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D, Kadirvel R, Lewis DA, Cloft HJ. A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke. 2007 Aug;38(8):2346-52. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576. Epub 2007 Jul 5. PubMed 17615366 ↗
  • Kadirvel R, Ding YH, Dai D, Rezek I, Lewis DA, Kallmes DF. Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology. 2014 Feb;270(2):394-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130796. Epub 2013 Oct 28. PubMed 24086073 ↗
  • Cancelliere NM, Nicholson P, Radovanovic I, Mendes KM, Orru E, Krings T, Pereira VM. Comparison of intra-aneurysmal flow modification using optical flow imaging to evaluate the performance of Evolve and Pipeline flow diverting stents. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Aug;12(8):814-817. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015696. Epub 2020 Apr 21. PubMed 32317371 ↗
  • Shapiro M, Raz E, Becske T, Nelson PK. Variable porosity of the pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Apr;35(4):727-33. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3742. Epub 2013 Sep 26. PubMed 24072622 ↗
  • Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia M, Cicala D, Caranci F, Maiuri F. p64 Flow Modulation Device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: initial experience and technical aspects. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Feb;8(2):173-80. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011743. Epub 2015 Apr 20. PubMed 25895510 ↗
  • Fischer S, Aguilar-Perez M, Henkes E, Kurre W, Ganslandt O, Bazner H, Henkes H. Initial Experience with p64: A Novel Mechanically Detachable Flow Diverter for the Treatment of Intracranial Saccular Sidewall Aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Nov;36(11):2082-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4420. Epub 2015 Aug 13. PubMed 26272970 ↗
  • Morais R, Mine B, Bruyere PJ, Naeije G, Lubicz B. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the p64 flow diverter stent: mid-term results in 35 patients with 41 intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2017 Mar;59(3):263-269. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1786-2. Epub 2017 Feb 24. PubMed 28236050 ↗
  • Briganti F, Leone G, Ugga L, Marseglia M, Macera A, Manto A, Delehaye L, Resta M, Resta M, Burdi N, Nuzzi NP, Divenuto I, Caranci F, Muto M, Solari D, Cappabianca P, Maiuri F. Mid-term and long-term follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by the p64 Flow Modulation Device: a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jan;9(1):70-76. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012502. Epub 2016 Jul 20. PubMed 27439887 ↗
  • Aguilar Perez M, Henkes E, Hellstern V, Serna Candel C, Wendl C, Bazner H, Ganslandt O, Henkes H. Endovascular Treatment of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms With the p64 Flow Modulation Device: Mid- and Long-Term Results in 617 Aneurysms From a Single Center. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Mar 15;20(4):355-363. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa425. PubMed 33469666 ↗
  • De Beule T, Boulanger T, Heye S, van Rooij WJ, van Zwam WH, Stockx L. p64 flow diverter: Results in 108 patients from a single center. Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Feb;27(1):51-59. doi: 10.1177/1591019920932048. Epub 2020 Jun 6. PubMed 32506988 ↗
  • Aguilar Perez M, Bhogal P, Henkes E, Ganslandt O, Bazner H, Henkes H. In-stent Stenosis after p64 Flow Diverter Treatment. Clin Neuroradiol. 2018 Dec;28(4):563-568. doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0591-y. Epub 2017 May 9. PubMed 28488025 ↗
  • Sirakov S, Sirakov A, Bhogal P, Penkov M, Minkin K, Ninov K, Hristov H, Karakostov V, Raychev R. The p64 Flow Diverter-Mid-term and Long-term Results from a Single Center. Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Sep;30(3):471-480. doi: 10.1007/s00062-019-00823-y. Epub 2019 Aug 9. PubMed 31399749 ↗
  • Bonafe A, Perez MA, Henkes H, Lylyk P, Bleise C, Gascou G, Sirakov S, Sirakov A, Stockx L, Turjman F, Petrov A, Roth C, Narata AP, Barreau X, Loehr C, Berlis A, Pierot L, Mis M, Goddard T, Clifton A, Klisch J, Walesa C, Dall'Olio M, Spelle L, Clarencon F, Yakovlev S, Keston P, Nuzzi NP, Dima S, Wendl C, Willems T, Schramm P. Diversion-p64: results from an international, prospective, multicenter, single-arm post-market study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the p64 flow modulation device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):898-903. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017809. Epub 2021 Nov 15. PubMed 34782399 ↗
  • Tonetti DA, Jankowitz BT, Gross BA. Antiplatelet Therapy in Flow Diversion. Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(Suppl 1):S47-S52. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz391. PubMed 31838537 ↗
  • Lenz-Habijan T, Bhogal P, Peters M, Bufe A, Martinez Moreno R, Bannewitz C, Monstadt H, Henkes H. Hydrophilic Stent Coating Inhibits Platelet Adhesion on Stent Surfaces: Initial Results In Vitro. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Nov;41(11):1779-1785. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2036-7. Epub 2018 Jul 23. PubMed 30039502 ↗
  • Hellstern V, Aguilar Perez M, Henkes E, Donauer E, Wendl C, Bazner H, Ganslandt O, Henkes H. Use of a p64 MW Flow Diverter with Hydrophilic Polymer Coating (HPC) and Prasugrel Single Antiplatelet Therapy for the Treatment of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: Safety Data and Short-term Occlusion Rates. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Sep;45(9):1364-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03153-8. Epub 2022 May 13. PubMed 35562486 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06201598
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Responsible party
Pedro Vega Valdes (PEDRO VEGA VALDES, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 11, 2024
Start date
Jan 12, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 22, 2024

Study contacts

PEDRO VEGA VALDES, MD, PhD
Contact
peveval@yahoo.es
0034985108000 ext. 39116

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion