ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06197503PHYSTAVIIIUpdated Mar 31, 2026

Randomized Study of Physiological vs Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Normal Ventricular Function Post TAVI

An interventional study of Conduction system pacing and Right ventricular pacing in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation, Physiological Pacing and Right Ventricular Pacing, sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Single-center randomized trial in patients with pacing indication (AV block) after TAVI (transfemoral aortic valve implantation) and LVEF> 50%, that aims to study the percentage of patients who improve at 12 months in a combined clinical endpoint.

Read the detailed description

There is currently no evidence of the best mode of definitive pacing after TAVI in patients with preserved systolic ventricular function and AV block. Through this study, investigators intend to elucidate the best post TAVI pacing strategy, comparing the effect of right apical pacing vs. physiological pacing on the evolution of both echocardiographic and clinical parameters.

Investigators will include 24 patients without ventricular dysfunction (LVEF> 50%) and with AV block pacing indication after TAVI.

Patients will be randomized to 2 types of pacing (parallel randomized trial): physiological or right ventricular pacing (conventional).

PHYS-TAVI trial will analyze the following parameters in the 2 groups: survival; NYHA class; distance in the 6-minute walking test; hospital admissions; left ventricular function; echocardiographic asynchrony (strain and flash septal); NTproBNP; and quality of life/symptoms with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire test (KCCQ-12)

Clinical, and echocardiographic follow-up will be performed for 1 year.

Inclusion of 24 more patients to those already included in the context of PHYSTAVI I (NCT04482816). Exploratory trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
  • Physiological Pacing
  • Right Ventricular Pacing
  • AV Block
  • Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function
03

In context

Atrioventricular Block

117 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrioventricular Block; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 48 is below the median of 127 across 78 interventional studies indexed under Atrioventricular Block.

Browse Atrioventricular Block studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona is the lead sponsor of 327 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Successful implantation of TAVI according to VARC-3 criteria.
  • Indication of cardiac pacing due to AV block according to ESC Guidelines.
  • > 50%.
  • The patient must indicate their acceptance to participate in the study by signing an document.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ventricular dysfunction: \<50%.
  • Transapical TAVI.
  • Participating currently in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment.
  • Patients with left bundle branch block but without indication of pacing (AV block).
  • \<12 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Conduction system pacing

    Lead placed in the His-Purkinje system (His or left bundle branch) in order to achieve QRS shortening and physiologic pacing. Crossover from physiological pacing to right ventricular pacing will be allowed in case of failed His bundle pacing or left bundle branch pacing.

    Procedure: Conduction system pacing

  • Active comparator
    Right ventricular pacing

    Lead placed in the right ventricle (conventional pacing).

    Procedure: Right ventricular pacing

Interventions

  • ProcedureConduction system pacing

    Left bundle branch pacing or His bundle branch pacing

  • ProcedureRight ventricular pacing

    Conventional pacing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical combined endpoint: survival; and improvement > 1 point in NYHA class or > 25% increase in the distance covered in the 6-minute walking test.

    Determine the percentage of patients who improve at 12 months on a clinical combined endpoint: survival; and improvement \> 1 point in NYHA class or \> 25% increase in the distance covered in the 6-minute walking test.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in left ventricular ejection fraction.

    Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF %) measured with Simpson method with echocardiography (Delta left ventricular ejection fraction: 12 months LVEF - baseline LVEF).

    Time frame: 12 months.

  2. Correction of echocardiographic asynchrony: septal flash expressed in mm.

    Correction of septal flash determined with echocardiography (M mode).

    Time frame: 30 days; 12 months.

  3. Distance covered in the 6-minute walking test.

    Distance in meters walked in 6 minutes.

    Time frame: 30 days; 12 months.

  4. Change in NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class.

    NYHA functional class I, II, III, IV.

    Time frame: 30 days; 12 months.

  5. Change in degree of mitral regurgitation.

    Mitral regurgitation (MR) measured with echocardiography. The severity of MR graded as absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2), moderate-severe (3), or severe (4).

    Time frame: 30 days; 12 months.

  6. Change in NTproBNP.

    NTproBNP blood levels.

    Time frame: Baseline; 12 months.

  7. Hospitalization due to heart failure.

    Hospitalization: patient hospitalization (yes/no).

    Time frame: 12 months.

  8. QRS duration.

    QRS duration (milliseconds) measured with a 12-lead ECG (200mm/s).

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Score on quality of life/symptoms Questionnaire (KCCQ-12 Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire).

    Score in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12: (higher=better).

    Time frame: 30 days; 12 months.

  10. Correction of global longitudinal strain

    Global longitudinal strain assessed with two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography

    Time frame: 30 days; 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06197503
Responsible party
Josep Lluis Mont Girbau (Head of Arrhythmia Research., Hospital Clinic of Barcelona) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 9, 2024
Start date
Nov 30, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2025
Completion
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Study contacts

Lluís Mont, MD, PhD
Contact
lmont@clinic.cat
93 2271778 Ext. 2094
Lluís Mont, MD, PhD
study director · Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. IDIBAPS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion