CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06197152ARF-RSVUpdated Jan 9, 2024

Identification and Clinical Validation of Biomarkers Associated With Clinical Severity in Adults Infected With RSV

An observational study in Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-09.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
133
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A short description, 5000 characters Intro: Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a frequent, ubiquitous agent of respiratory viral infections. It is the leading viral cause of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in infants and also causes significant morbidity and mortality in adults, especially in the elderly, in patients with cardiorespiratory comorbidities [e.g., patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and/or heart failure], and in immunocompromised patients. Clinical phenotyping of RSV respiratory infections has shown that the occurrence of LRTI in RSV-infected patients is associated with the need for ventilatory support and an increased risk of mortality. Virological data also suggest that there is a relationship between high nasopharyngeal viral replication levels and a poor prognosis, although these data have not been confirmed in other studies. Beyond viral load, the impact of viral subtypes on the severity of RSV infection is controversial. Few data have explored the prognostic value of genetic diversity (i.e., role of RSV variants, mutations occurring during clinical course) in RSV-infected adult patients with acute respiratory failure.

Objective: The main goal of the present study is to identify and validate biomarkers associated with RSV severity in adults infected with RSV that will be useful to guide treatment decisions in the future. This study will additionally characterize the thus far unknown genetic diversity of RSV in hospitalized adults with severe and mild infections, in order to anticipate virological escape mechanisms from current and future treatments.

Method: This is a prospective multicenter cohort study of patients with RSV infection admitted to the hospital. These patients will be followed-up for 28 days. Nasopharyngeal samples will be obtained sequentially (i.e., at day 0, day 3-4, day 5-7, and day 14 of inclusion) for virological and transcriptomic analyses. Blood samples will also be collected at day 0 (EDTA tubes and Paxgene tubes) for peripheral transcriptomic analyses and plasma banking.

The 100 first patients included in the study will be allocated to the development cohort and the last 100 patients will be allocated to the validation cohort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections

Keywords

  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus
  • RSV
  • Respiratory infection
  • Febrile acute respiratory syndrome
  • Immuno-virological determinants
03

In context

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections

293 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 133 is below the median of 346 across 73 observational studies indexed under Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections.

Browse Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with RSV diagnosis : Patients hospitalized for RSV respiratory infection requiring hospital admission.

Control group : patients admitted for acute respiratory failure free for RSV or any other infection.

Eligibility criteria

Group of patients with RSV diagnosis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Positive RSV RT-PCR in nasopharyngeal swab
  • Patient admitted to the hospital (intensive care unit or medical ward admission at inclusion) with clinical signs of lower respiratory tract infection (defined as the presence of two or more respiratory signes (cough, dyspnea, sputum production, wheezing, tachypnea (respiratory rate>20/min) or one respiratory sign plus one or more systemic symptoms (fatigue and fever)) requiring hospitalization.
  • No objection letter (from the patient or a member of family if the patient is not physically able to give consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Co-infection with other respiratory viruses
  • Persons under guardianship/guardianship
  • AME (state medical aid) patient

Group of "control" patients

Inclusion Criteria :

  • Age>18 years
  • Patient's consent
  • Enrolled in a social security plan
  • Admitted for an acute respiratory syndrome
  • No diagnosis of respiratory infection in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion
  • Negative RSV nasopharyngeal PCR (or other respiratory specimen) collected within the last 48 hours
  • No immunosuppression (HIV infection, bone marrow or solid organ transplantation, post-chemotherapy aplasia, immunosuppressive therapy, corticosteroid therapy (> 200 mg/d hydrocortisone or equivalent within 4 weeks prior to inclusion)

Exclusion Criteria :

  • Persons under guardianship/guardianship
  • AME (state medical aid) patient
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
133 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • 100 patients with RSV diagnosis

    Patients with acute respiratory infection and positive nasopharyngeal PCR or other respiratory specimen for RSV.

    Other: Nasopharyngeal swabs and biological collection

  • 33 control patients

    Patient admitted for acute respiratory syndrome with no diagnosis of respiratory infection or immunosuppression.

    Other: Nasopharyngeal swabs and biological collection

Interventions

  • OtherNasopharyngeal swabs and biological collection

    * Nasopharyngeal PCR * Blood and virological samples taken as part of the research will be included in a biological collection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Inflammatory and immune response

    Patients with severe disease, defined as developing acute respiratory failure with a World Health Organization (WHO) ten-point scale ≥6 at any time of hospital stay, and those with mild disease (WHO ten-point scale remaining \<6 during hospital stay) will be compared using several biological tools, in particular the inflammatory and immune response assessed by transcriptomic analyses in peripheral blood and in respiratory samples (nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or tracheal aspirates when available).

    Time frame: within 72h of hospitalization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inflammatory and immune response during hospital stay

    Differences between the two groups of RSV-infected patients, with severe disease (WHO ten-point scale ≥6) versus mild disease (WHO ten-point scale remaining \<6), of inflammatory and immune responses assessed by transcriptomic analyses in respiratory samples (nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or tracheal aspirates when available).

    Time frame: during hospitalization (until day 28).

  2. RSV genetic variability during hospitalization

    Relationship between viral level dynamics and intra-individual viral genetic variability in respiratory samples (nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or tracheal aspirates when available).

    Time frame: during hospitalization (until day 28)

  3. RSV genetic variability at admission

    Differences between the two groups of RSV-infected patients, with severe disease (WHO ten-point scale ≥6) versus mild disease (WHO ten-point scale remaining \<6), of inter-individual viral genetic variability in respiratory samples (nasopharyngeal swabs).

    Time frame: during hospitalization (within 72h of hospitalization)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — DATAS ARE OWN BY ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE - HOPITAUX DE PARIS, PLEASE CONTACT SPONSOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06197152
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 9, 2024
Start date
Nov 27, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 9, 2024

Study contacts

Nicolas de Prost, MD, PhD
Contact
nicolas.de-prost@aphp.fr
(+33) 1 49 81 23 94
Slim Fourati, MD, PhD
Contact
slim.fourati@aphp.fr
(+33) 1 45 17 81 45
Pierre-André Natella, PhD
study chair · APHP URC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion