An interventional study of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) in Gastroparesis, sponsored by University of Arkansas. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-25.
Sponsored by University of Arkansas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Gastroparesis is a chronic disease of the stomach that causes delayed gastric emptying without stenosis. The clinical symptoms of gastroparesis include nausea, vomiting, early satiety, post-prandial fullness, bloating, belching, and upper abdominal discomfort Gastroparesis cardinal symptoms index (GCSI) is a reliable, reproducible, and valid instrument for measuring symptom severity in patients with gastroparesis.
This will be a randomized controlled trial of all the patients who are referred to the University of Arkansas Medical Sciences (UAMS) for gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) for treatment of refractory and severe gastroparesis. During G-POEM procedure, either single or double pyloromyotomy will be performed with randomization. The aim is to compare clinical outcomes and the efficacy of single versus double pyloromyotomy in G-POEM for refractory and severe gastroparesis.
Gastroparesis is a chronic disease of the stomach that causes delayed gastric emptying without stenosis. It is a chronic alteration of gastric motility that leads to a delay in stomach emptying. It is an underdiagnosed condition. The prevalence is estimated at around 3% in the United States (mean age of 37.7 years, with an F: M ratio of 4:1. It is mainly an idiopathic condition; however, it can also be caused by diabetes mellitus and post-surgical conditions, such as fundoplication, vagotomy, bariatric surgery, and esophagectomy. Less frequently by conditions like post-infectious gastro-paresis, neurological or autoimmune diseases. The clinical symptoms of gastroparesis include nausea, vomiting, early satiety, post-prandial fullness, bloating, belching, and upper abdominal discomfort. The gastroparesis cardinal symptoms index (GCSI) is a reliable, reproducible, and valid instrument for measuring symptom severity in patients with gastroparesis. It is based on three sub-scales (post-prandial fullness/early satiety-4 items; nausea/vomiting-3 items; bloating-2 items), and each item ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (severe). GCSI is not a diagnostic tool, but it is helpful to measure the severity of the disease and the post-treatment improvement. Though the prevalence of gastroparesis has significantly increased over the last decade, management is still challenging. Patients with mild symptoms can be referred for dietary modifications coupled with medical therapy with prokinetics, especially metoclopramide. However, the response to prokinetics decreases over time. Moreover, these drugs have side effects, such as extrapyramidal symptoms and amenorrhea. Surgical approaches have been proposed; however, the invasive nature of those procedures and the low rate of clinical success have made them less favorable. Endoscopic interventions have also been described, including intra-pyloric injection of botulinum toxin, endoscopic gastrojejunostomy, and transpyloric stenting. For patients with refractory (persistent symptoms for >6 months refractory to medical therapy) and severe gastroparesis based on GCSI > 2, gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy can be considered. In 2013, the first human gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) was performed. It was inspired by the per-oral endoscopic myotomy technique, with a similar dissection method, that allows pyloromyotomy. The technical steps of G-POEM involve mucosal incision about 5 cm from the pylorus with the creation of access to the submucosal plane after detaching the planes by injection of lifting solution; creation of the submucosal tunnel with dissection technique up to the duodenal bulb and exposure of the pylorus; verification of the integrity of the mucosal surface; pyloromyotomy and closure of the mucosal flap with multiple endoclips. In the single pyloromyotomy group, a selective circular pyloromyotomy is performed at the 6 or 7 o'clock position after identifying the pyloric ring. In the double pyloromyotomy group, another selective cut is performed at the 4 or 5 o'clock position to keep at least 1 cm between the two pyloromyotomies.
Only one retrospective case-controlled study compares single versus double pyloromyotomy at G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis. It showed a higher clinical response rate with double pyloromyotomy when compared with single pyloromyotomy in a 3- to 6-month follow-up period.
In this randomized controlled prospective multicenter study, the aim is to compare clinical outcomes and the efficacy of single versus double pyloromyotomy in G-POEM for refractory and severe gastroparesis. Prospective subjects will be approached regarding study inclusion either during a pre-endoscopy visit or shortly before the planned endoscopy procedure. If the latter, the prospective subject will be approached during intake and before being brought to the back for the procedure. The prospective subjects will be approached before any pre-procedure medication is administered. The study will be explained in detail and, if the prospective participant agrees, an informed consent form - HIPAA Research Authorization will be taken.
Prospective subjects will be randomized into one of two study groups: Single pyloromyotomy vs Double pyloromyotomy G-POEM using a computer-generated random sequence (prepared by the UAMS Biostatistics group) that will be placed in sealed envelopes. The envelopes will accompany the informed consent form will be opened after obtaining informed consent from the patients to determine their group assignment. The patient will open the envelop and hand it to the endoscopist performing the procedure.
Once randomized, the subjects will undergo the scheduled endoscopic procedure as planned.
Subjects will be followed up in the clinic at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months (one year) after procedure per routine care.
307 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroparesis; 68 are open to participants now.
Browse Gastroparesis studies →University of Arkansas is the lead sponsor of 391 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.
Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 34 (92%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Single cut pyloromyotomy technique during gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) procedure
Procedure: gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM)
Double cut pyloromyotomy technique during gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) procedure
Procedure: gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM)
Comparing single versus double pyloromyotomy in G-POEM for refractory and severe gastroparesis.
Clinical success at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months follow up
Measuring clinical success
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score before and after GPOEM at 3, 6 months and 12 months follow up
Measuring GCSI scores
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Technical success rate
Measuring technical success
Time frame: At time of procedure
Total procedure time for each method
Documenting total time to perform procedure
Time frame: At time of procedure
Adverse events like pneumoperitoneum, gi bleeding, perforation, infection and abdominal pain
Adverse events with both techniques
Time frame: 0 and1 month
Recurrence of symptoms
Any recurrence of gastroparesis symptoms
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Arkansas