CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06171607Updated Feb 2, 2026

Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Medical Imaging for Identifying Breast Masses

A Phase 1 interventional study of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Perflutren Lipid Microspheres in Breast Carcinoma, sponsored by University of Southern California. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-02.

Sponsored by University of Southern California · Phase 1, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2020, registered Jul 2022).
  • Started Nov 2020; still recruiting 5 years 11 months later.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This clinical trial investigates the role of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in identifying cystic breast masses as benign or malignant. Ultrasound is a diagnostic imaging test that uses sound waves to make pictures of the body without using radiation (x-rays). Ultrasounds are widely used to diagnose many diseases in the body. This trial may help researchers learn if using CEUS will help in determining whether or not an ultrasound guided biopsy is necessary.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To examine and compare the distribution of CEUS parameters in breast masses that were evaluated as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4a, 4b, 4c or 5 by conventional ultrasound (US) and were recommended for ultrasound guided biopsy, and to evaluate whether these parameters can be used to classify suspicious cystic-appearing breast masses as benign or malignant.

Ia. To develop a CEUS-based radiomics workflow to extract radiomic metrics (> 1600 features) in classifying breast mass malignancy (Radiomics).

Ib. To develop a systematic and rigorous machine learning (ML)-based framework comprised of classification, cross-validation and statistical analyses to identify the best performing classifier for breast malignancy stratification based on CEUS-derived radiomic metrics (time-intensity curve [TIC] analysis and Radiomics).

Ic. To assess the independent contribution of radiomics classifier and time-intensity curve classifier to the model accuracy in discriminating benign from malignant cases (TIC analysis versus [vs.] Radiomics).

Id. To assess the potential benefit of machine learning classifier in preventing unnecessary biopsy (TIC analysis and Radiomics).

OUTLINE:

Patients receive a contrast agent (Lumason or DEFINITY) intravenously (IV) and then undergo CEUS scan over 60-90 minutes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Carcinoma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southern California is the lead sponsor of 773 studies on the registry; 135 are open to participants now.

Of its 68 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 32 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Newly diagnosed breast masses assigned as BIRADS 4a, 4b, 4c or 5 by conventional US and recommended for ultrasound guided biopsy
  • Age >= 18 years
  • Female

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to microbubble contrast: Patients who have a known pulmonary hypertension and any known hypersensitivity to US contrast agent
  • Women with renal failure or insufficiency (only if patient is receiving CESM scan)
  • Women with Iodine contrast allergy (only if patient is receiving CESM scan)
  • Women with the largest side of the mass measuring ≤ 1 cm (only if patient is receiving CEUS scan)
  • Women who are pregnant, possibly pregnant, or lactating
  • Women currently undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Women \< 18 years of age
  • Patient ≤ 30 years (only if patient is receiving CESM scan)
  • Masses in the same breast that had prior lumpectomy for cancer
  • Women with cancer in the same breast will be excluded however, women with cancer in the contralateral breast will be eligible to participate in the study
  • Women with an allergy to perflutren (only if patient is receiving CEUS scan)
  • Prior history of biopsy for that specific lesion
  • Women with breast implants
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Diagnostic (contrast agent, CEUS)

    Patients receive a contrast tracer (Lumason or DEFINITY) IV and then undergo CEUS scan over 60-90 minutes.

    Procedure: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound · Drug: Perflutren Lipid Microspheres · Drug: Sulfur Hexafluoride Lipid Microspheres

Interventions

  • ProcedureContrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

    Undergo CEUS

    Also known as: CEUS

  • DrugPerflutren Lipid Microspheres

    Given IV

    Also known as: Definity

  • DrugSulfur Hexafluoride Lipid Microspheres

    Given IV

    Also known as: Lumason, SF6 Lipid Microspheres, Sulfur Hexafluoride Lipid-type A Microspheres

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiomics-based ML-classifier framework

    The performance of radiomics-based ML classifier framework will be compared to the performance of the TIC metrics. The joint performance of radiomics and TIC analysis will be compared to their individual performances. The classifier performance will be assessed using the area under curve (AUC). The Z-test will be used to compare the difference between the area under the curves 1) AUCboth versus (vs.) AUCradiomic 2) AUCboth vs. AUCTIC 3) AUCTIC vs. AUCradiomic.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  2. Performance of radiomics-based ML approach to prevent unnecessary biopsies

    Will assess the percentage of benign cases that can be classified as benign by ML (Specificity) thus been prevented from biopsy. Will select the diagnostic cut-off point based on the ROC curve constructed from the predicted probability. Such a cut-off point will result in a maximal sensitivity (100%). Specificity with 95% Clopper Pearson confidence interval will be obtained.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
    Recruiting
  • USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06171607
Lead sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 14, 2023
Start date
Nov 5, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 5, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 5, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 2, 2026

Study contacts

Janet Jaime
Contact
Janet.jaime@med.usc.edu
323-865-3205
Bino A Varghese, PhD
principal investigator · University of Southern California

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion