ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06171386Updated May 7, 2026

Microneedling vs Dermabrasion for Early Facial Scar Resurfacing

An interventional study of Microneedling and Dermabrasion in Scar, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-07.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to determine whether microneedling or dermabrasion in the early post-operative period is superior in improving the appearance of surgical scars on the face.

Read the detailed description

Microneedling and dermabrasion are two common modalities that may be performed in-office to treat surgical scars.

Microneedling is a form of collagen induction therapy, often used in conjunction with platelet-rich plasma or hyaluronic acid.

Dermabrasion is a technique that improves the skin structure, quality, and appearance of scars through collagen remodeling and reepithelization.

To determine which modality is most effective, a prospective study; randomizing a volunteer sample of adult patients with new surgical vertical forehead scars will receive either dermabrasion or microneedling in the early postoperative period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scar

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dermabrasion
  • Microneedling
  • Surgical scars
03

In context

Cicatrix

611 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 40 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix.

Browse Cicatrix studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,351 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 332 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 251 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Volunteer adult patients will be identified by visiting the Facial Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist.
  • Patients will be 18 years old+ and have a vertical surgical scar in the superior 1/3 of the face (trichion to glabella).
  • Patients will enroll in the clinic research registry and indicate an interest in being involved in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who rate Types 4-6 on the Fitzpatrick scale will be excluded due to risk of poor outcome from dermabrasion.
  • There are no other planned exclusion criteria. Patients will not be excluded on the basis of gender, race/ethnicity, or age, provided that they meet the described inclusion criteria.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    microneedling

    microneedling is a form of collagen induction therapy, often used in conjunction with platelet-rich plasma or hyaluronic acid - Patients will receive two treatments, once at 6-8 weeks following facial surgery, and the second at 12-16 weeks following facial surgery

    Procedure: Microneedling

  • Active comparator
    dermabrasion

    dermabrasion is a technique that improves the skin structure, quality, and appearance of scars through collagen remodeling and reepithelization - Patients will receive the standard of care treatment 6-10 weeks following facial surgery

    Procedure: Dermabrasion

Interventions

  • ProcedureMicroneedling

    a form of collagen induction therapy

  • ProcedureDermabrasion

    a technique that improves the skin structure, quality, and appearance of scars through collagen remodeling and reepithelization

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Vancouver Scar Scale Scores

    Four characteristics of the scar are assessed. These are: vascularity, height, pliability, and pigmentation. Each characteristic is given a score, which are added together to give an overall score between 0 and 13 - lower scores denoting normal skin

    Time frame: Month 7

  2. Change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Scores

    Items and total scale scores for the patient and observer: Each item on both scales has a score of 1 to 10. The lowest score is 1 and corresponds to the normal skin situation. The total score of both scales can be calculated simply by adding the scores of each of the six items. The total score will range from 6 to 60 - lower scores denoting normal skin

    Time frame: Month 7

  3. Change in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Scores

    5-point scale wherein 2 = much improved (marked improvement in appearance), 1 = improved (improvement in appearance but a touch-up or re-treatment is indicated - lower scores denoting normal skin

    Time frame: Month 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient perceived benefit

    At the time of intervention, patients will be asked to rank pain of procedure on a scale of 1-10 (1: minimal discomfort, 10: severe pain). At 6 months, they will also give a yes/no response as to whether they would undergo the study protocol (procedure) again.

    Time frame: At time of procedure (pain scale); at 6 months (yes/no)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — photo documentation, de-identified, for review of scar appearance after treatment

Time frame: Data will become available after all data collection is complete in order to perform independent blinded analysis of scars at all time points.

Access criteria: Researchers on the study protocol involved in scar assessment

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 36 months after the start.

Of 173 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cicatrix, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 206 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 5, 2023
First posted
Dec 14, 2023
StartActual
Apr 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 2027
Last update
May 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06171386
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 14, 2023
Start date
Apr 1, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2026

Study contacts

Candace M Waters, MD
Contact
cmwaters@wakehealth.edu
336-716-4000
Alexa l Lacy
Contact
Alexa.Lacy@advocatehealth.org
336-716-3850
Candace M Water, MD
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion