CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06170450Updated Jul 24, 2026Results posted

Cyclic Versus Continuous Sacral Neuromodulation for LUTS

An interventional study of Cyclic SNM and Continuous SNM in Overactive Bladder Syndrome, sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-24.

Sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This will be a prospective, randomized-controlled multi-site trial comparing cyclic versus continuous sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for OAB.

Read the detailed description

Overactive bladder (OAB) is characterized by urinary frequency, urgency, incontinence, and nocturia in the absence of other pathology. AUA guidelines recommend trial of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for patients with refractory OAB who have failed treatment with behavioral modification and medication. SNM settings are typically selected based on discussion between the patient and device representative. There is a paucity of rigorous data assessing optimal SNM stimulation programming for symptomatic improvement.

This will be a prospective, randomized-controlled multi-site trial comparing cyclic versus continuous sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in patients undergoing SNM for OAB.

Patients > age 18 with a diagnosis of refractory OAB being scheduled for a trial of SNM (either stage I lead/temporary battery placement or office peripheral nerve evaluation) will be approached by study personnel during their clinic visit or by a phone call to determine if they are interested in participating in the programming study.

Patients interested in participating will provide written informed consent. After informed consent is obtained, a baseline evaluation will be performed. This includes history, 3-day voiding diary (# voiding episodes, # nocturia episodes, # urge incontinence episodes/24h), urinalysis, urine culture (if indicated), post void residuals, and symptom assessments using questionnaires.

Only those with successful trial and eligible/ interested in permanent SNM placement will participate in this trial. Randomization will occur after stage 2/ full permanent implantation when the neuromodulator is being programmed in the recovery room. Patients will be randomly assigned to either continuous stimulation or cyclic stimulation.

Patients will then be followed with clinical evaluation and questionnaires repeated at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 3 years, and 5 years post-op.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder Syndrome
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 283 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18 years of age or older
  • Female
  • English Speaking
  • Diagnosis of urinary urge incontinence or overactive bladder
  • Meet criteria for and are planning permanent SNM (ie. successful stage I or office PNE trial of SNM with 50% or more reduction in UUI episodes)
  • Willing and able to complete all study related items

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than 18 years of age
  • Unable to provide consent
  • Non-English speaking
  • Relevant neurologic diseases (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson Disease, myasthenia gravis, - - - Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, complete spinal cord injury)
  • Current or prior bladder malignancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cyclic SNM

    Programming of the SNM device will occur as per standard protocol in discussion between patient and SNM representative. The intervention will be to set the device to cycling stimulation program mode.

    Device: Cyclic SNM

  • Active comparator
    Continuous SNM

    Programming of the SNM device will occur as per standard protocol in discussion between patient and SNM representative. The intervention will be to set the device to continuous stimulation programming (SNM is continuously stimulating without "off" periods)

    Device: Continuous SNM

Interventions

  • DeviceCyclic SNM

    SNM cycling: 8 hours on, 16 hours off

  • DeviceContinuous SNM

    Continuous SNM: on continuously, no 'off' period

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in ICIQ-OAB-QoL Score

    ICIQ-OABqol is a 28 question patient-completed survey evaluating quality of life (QoL) in patients with overactive bladder. Score ranges 25-160 points with greater value indicating increased impact on quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in ICIQ-OAB-QoL Score

    ICIQ-OABqol is a 28 question patient-completed survey evaluating quality of life (QoL) in patients with overactive bladder. Score ranges 25-160 points with greater value indicating increased impact on quality of life

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months post-operatively

  2. Change in OAB-q SF

    OAB-q SF is a 19 question patient-completed survey evaluating symptom bother and quality of life in patients with overactive bladder. Scores range 3- 36, higher values indicating increased symptom severity

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

  3. Change in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS)

    The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) is a 4 question validated symptom assessment tool for patients with OAB and assesses number of episodes of frequency, nocturia, urgency, and urge incontinence. Scores range 0-15 with higher scores indicating higher severity.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

  4. Change in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire SF (IIQ-7)

    Incontinence Impact Questionnaire SF (IIQ-7) is a 7-item validated questionnaire that assesses urinary symptoms, the symptom bother, and the impact the bother has on patients' quality of life using a 4-point bother scale. Scores range 0-100 (raw score multiplied by 33 1/3 to transform scale) with higher scores indicating higher bother

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

  5. Urinary Distress Inventory SF (UDI-6)

    Urinary Distress Inventory SF (UDI-6) is a 6 item validated questionnaire that assesses urinary symptoms, the symptom bother, and the impact the bother has on patients' quality of life using a 4-point bother scale. Scores 6 items, range 0-100 (raw score multiplied by 33 1/3 to transform scale) with higher scores indicating higher distress.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

  6. Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

    Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a 1-item 4-point scale designed to assess for disease severity where 1 indicates "normal," 2 is "mild," 3 is "moderate," and 4 is "severe." Outcome measured is number of participants per group who reported disease is "severe" at each timepoint.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

  7. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

    Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a 1-item scale designed to assess symptom improvement with answer choices: Very much better, Much better, A little better, No change, A little worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Outcome measure includes number of participants per group who reported "very much better" or "much better" at each timepoint

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

  8. Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire

    Change in Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SAT-q) is an 11-item validated questionnaire that assesses patients' satisfaction with their OAB treatment within a clinical setting from baseline. Score range 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater treatment satisfaction

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

  9. Change in Voiding Episodes Per Day

    Patients will use 3 days bladder diaries to track voiding episodes per day, voiding episodes per night, pads per day, and urge incontinence episodes per day. Daily voiding frequency will be the voiding episodes per day averaged over 3 day bladder diary.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

  10. Change in Voiding Episodes Per Night

    Patients will use 3 day bladder diaries to track voiding episodes per day, voiding episodes per night, pads per day, and urge incontinence episodes. Voiding episodes per night will be voiding episodes per night averaged over 3 day bladder diary.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

  11. Change in Pads Per Day

    Patients will use 3 day bladder diaries to track voiding episodes per day, voiding episodes per night, pads per day, and urge incontinence episodes. Pads per day will be the pad count per day averaged over 3 day bladder diary.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

  12. Change in Urge Incontinence Episodes Per Day

    Patients will use 3 day bladder diaries to track voiding episodes per day, voiding episodes per night, pad count per day, and urge incontinence episodes per day. Urge incontinence episodes will be the urge incontinence episodes per day averaged over 3 day bladder diary.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively

07

Results

Posted Jul 24, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
Started2525
Completed2124
Not completed41
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up41

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in ICIQ-OAB-QoL Score

ICIQ-OABqol is a 28 question patient-completed survey evaluating quality of life (QoL) in patients with overactive bladder. Score ranges 25-160 points with greater value indicating increased impact on quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · change in score on a scale
Change in ICIQ-OAB-QoL Score
change in score on a scaleCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
Change in ICIQ-OAB-QoL Score-29.4 ± 33-27.0 ± 36
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.82 · Median difference (final values): -2.4 · 95% CI -22.5 to 17.7
SecondaryChange in ICIQ-OAB-QoL Score

ICIQ-OABqol is a 28 question patient-completed survey evaluating quality of life (QoL) in patients with overactive bladder. Score ranges 25-160 points with greater value indicating increased impact on quality of life

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · change in score on a scale
Change in ICIQ-OAB-QoL Score
change in score on a scaleCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively-40.0 ± 30-45.7 ± 26
6 months post-operatively-25.3 ± 34-44.0 ± 32
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.49 · Median difference (final values): 5.7 · 95% CI -10.5 to 22
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.04 · Median difference (final values): 18.7 · 95% CI 1.1 to 36.2
SecondaryChange in OAB-q SF

OAB-q SF is a 19 question patient-completed survey evaluating symptom bother and quality of life in patients with overactive bladder. Scores range 3- 36, higher values indicating increased symptom severity

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score on a scale
Change in OAB-q SF
Change in score on a scaleCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively-11.1 ± 6-12.2 ± 9
6 months post- operatively-7.1 ± 9-11.9 ± 8
12 months post-operatively-7.9 ± 7-8.0 ± 9
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.62 · Median difference (final values): 1.1 · 95% CI -3.1 to 5.3
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.03 · Mean difference (final values): 4.8 · 95% CI 0.4 to 9.2
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = >0.99 · Mean difference (final values): 0.01 · 95% CI -4.9 to 4.9The Mean Difference of "0.01" was calculated using Linear Mixed Effects Models and is consistent with reported difference in change from baseline to 12-month data between groups for this Outcome Measure
SecondaryChange in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS)

The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) is a 4 question validated symptom assessment tool for patients with OAB and assesses number of episodes of frequency, nocturia, urgency, and urge incontinence. Scores range 0-15 with higher scores indicating higher severity.

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score on a scale
Change in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS)
Change in score on a scaleCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively-3.7 ± 3-5.3 ± 4
6 months post-operatively-1.9 ± 3-4.5 ± 4
12 months post-operatively-2.6 ± 3-2.6 ± 4
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1 · Median difference (final values): 1.6 · 95% CI -0.3 to 3.5
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.01 · Median difference (final values): 2.6 · 95% CI 0.7 to 4.6
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.97 · Mean difference (final values): -0.04 · 95% CI -2.1 to 2
SecondaryChange in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire SF (IIQ-7)

Incontinence Impact Questionnaire SF (IIQ-7) is a 7-item validated questionnaire that assesses urinary symptoms, the symptom bother, and the impact the bother has on patients' quality of life using a 4-point bother scale. Scores range 0-100 (raw score multiplied by 33 1/3 to transform scale) with higher scores indicating higher bother

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score on a scale
Change in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire SF (IIQ-7)
Change in score on a scaleCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively-39.9 ± 32-46.6 ± 31
6 months post-operatively-25.9 ± 37-49.0 ± 31
12 months post-operatively-25.7 ± 34-34.6 ± 39
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.43 · Median difference (final values): 6.7 · 95% CI -10 to 23.5
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.01 · Median difference (final values): 23.1 · 95% CI 5.4 to 40.8
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.39 · Median difference (final values): 8.9 · 95% CI -11.3 to 29.2
SecondaryUrinary Distress Inventory SF (UDI-6)

Urinary Distress Inventory SF (UDI-6) is a 6 item validated questionnaire that assesses urinary symptoms, the symptom bother, and the impact the bother has on patients' quality of life using a 4-point bother scale. Scores 6 items, range 0-100 (raw score multiplied by 33 1/3 to transform scale) with higher scores indicating higher distress.

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score on a scale
Urinary Distress Inventory SF (UDI-6)
Change in score on a scaleCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively-20.7 ± 21-36.2 ± 21
6 months post-operatively-15.4 ± 29-34.6 ± 19
12 months post-operatively-15.0 ± 20-25.5 ± 25
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.01 · Median difference (final values): 15.5 · 95% CI 4.1 to 27
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.01 · Median difference (final values): 19.2 · 95% CI 7.4 to 31.1
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.12 · Mean difference (final values): 10.6 · 95% CI -2.6 to 23.7
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a 1-item 4-point scale designed to assess for disease severity where 1 indicates "normal," 2 is "mild," 3 is "moderate," and 4 is "severe." Outcome measured is number of participants per group who reported disease is "severe" at each timepoint.

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
ParticipantsCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively10
6 months post-operativley54
12 months post-operatively53
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Chi-squared · p = 0.31Only Chi-Square was used to compare participants reporting severe disease per group
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Chi-squared · p = 0.71Only Chi-Square was used to compare participants reporting severe disease per group
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Chi-squared · p = 0.44Only Chi-Square was used to compare participants reporting severe disease per group
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a 1-item scale designed to assess symptom improvement with answer choices: Very much better, Much better, A little better, No change, A little worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Outcome measure includes number of participants per group who reported "very much better" or "much better" at each timepoint

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
ParticipantsCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively914
6 months post-operatively714
12 months post-operatively1114
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Chi-squared · p = 0.16only chi-squared was used to compare number of participants per group reporting improvement
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Chi-squared · p = 0.04only chi-squared was used to compare number of participants per group reporting improvement
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Chi-squared · p = 0.4only chi-squared was used to compare number of participants per group reporting improvement
SecondaryOveractive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire

Change in Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SAT-q) is an 11-item validated questionnaire that assesses patients' satisfaction with their OAB treatment within a clinical setting from baseline. Score range 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater treatment satisfaction

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire
score on a scaleCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively73.5 ± 1377.8 ± 22
6 months post-operatively67.3 ± 2276.9 ± 20
12 months post-operatively68.3 ± 1670.5 ± 13
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.53 · Mean difference (final values): -4.3 · 95% CI -17.7 to 9.1
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.12 · Mean difference (final values): -9.6 · 95% CI -21.6 to 2.4
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.69 · Mean difference (final values): -2.3 · 95% CI -13.3 to 8.8
SecondaryChange in Voiding Episodes Per Day

Patients will use 3 days bladder diaries to track voiding episodes per day, voiding episodes per night, pads per day, and urge incontinence episodes per day. Daily voiding frequency will be the voiding episodes per day averaged over 3 day bladder diary.

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Voiding episodes per day
Change in Voiding Episodes Per Day
Voiding episodes per dayCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively-3.2 (-4.1 to -2.3)-3.3 (-4.2 to -2.3)
6 months post-operatively-2.2 (-3.3 to -1.1)-3.1 (-4.2 to -2.0)
12 months post-operatively-2.5 (-3.9 to -1.2)-2.4 (-3.7 to -1.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.93 · Median difference (final values): 0.1 · 95% CI -1.2 to 1.4
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.26 · Mean difference (final values): 0.9 · 95% CI -0.7 to 2.5
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.87 · Mean difference (final values): -0.2 · 95% CI -2.1 to 1.8
SecondaryChange in Voiding Episodes Per Night

Patients will use 3 day bladder diaries to track voiding episodes per day, voiding episodes per night, pads per day, and urge incontinence episodes. Voiding episodes per night will be voiding episodes per night averaged over 3 day bladder diary.

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Voiding episodes per night
Change in Voiding Episodes Per Night
Voiding episodes per nightCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively-0.9 (-1.4 to -0.3)-0.9 (-1.4 to -0.3)
6 months post-operatively-0.02 (-0.7 to 0.7)-1.1 (-1.8 to -0.4)
12 months post-operatively-0.1 (-1.0 to 0.8)-0.3 (-1.1 to 0.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.96 · Median difference (final values): 0.02 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.8
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.03 · Median difference (final values): 1.1 · 95% CI 0.1 to 2.1
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.8 · Mean difference (final values): 0.2 · 95% CI -1.1 to 1.4
SecondaryChange in Pads Per Day

Patients will use 3 day bladder diaries to track voiding episodes per day, voiding episodes per night, pads per day, and urge incontinence episodes. Pads per day will be the pad count per day averaged over 3 day bladder diary.

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Pads per day
Change in Pads Per Day
Pads per dayCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively-1.8 (-2.7 to -0.9)-2.4 (-3.3 to -1.6)
6 months post-operatively-0.1 (-1.2 to 0.9)-1.9 (-2.9 to -0.9)
12 months post-operatively-0.6 (-1.9 to 0.7)-1.3 (-2.6 to 0.02)
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.32 · Median difference (final values): 0.6 · 95% CI -0.6 to 1.9
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.02 · Median difference (final values): 1.8 · 95% CI 0.3 to 3.3
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.48 · Median difference (final values): 0.7 · 95% CI -1.2 to 2.6
SecondaryChange in Urge Incontinence Episodes Per Day

Patients will use 3 day bladder diaries to track voiding episodes per day, voiding episodes per night, pad count per day, and urge incontinence episodes per day. Urge incontinence episodes will be the urge incontinence episodes per day averaged over 3 day bladder diary.

Time frame:
1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Urge incontinence episodes per
Change in Urge Incontinence Episodes Per Day
Urge incontinence episodes perCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
1 month post-operatively-3.1 (-4.1 to -2.0)-4.5 (-5.7 to -3.4)
6 months post-operatively-1.8 (-2.9 to -0.6)-3.4 (-4.5 to -2.2)
12 months post-operatively-2.7 (-4.2 to -1.2)-1.9 (-3.4 to -0.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.08 · Mean difference (final values): 1.5 · 95% CI -0.2 to 3.1
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.06 · Mean difference (final values): 1.6 · 95% CI -0.1 to 3.3
  • Cyclic SNM vs Continuous SNM · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.45 · Mean difference (final values): -0.8 · 95% CI -2.9 to 1.3

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cyclic SNM0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)10/25 (40%)
Continuous SNM0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)11/25 (44%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCyclic SNMContinuous SNM
Reported uncomfortable stimulationNervous system disorders8/2510/25
Surgical revision of device due to malpositioningSurgical and medical procedures2/251/25
Device infectionInfections and infestations0/251/25
Surgical removal of device due to infectionSurgical and medical procedures0/251/25

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cyclic SNMContinuous SNMTotal
Mean69 ± 1168 ± 1068 ± 11
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cyclic SNMContinuous SNMTotal
Female252550
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cyclic SNMContinuous SNMTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American538
White202242
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • University of Louisville
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • University Hospitals
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • MetroHealth
    Cleveland, Ohio 44109, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 8, 2024
  • Informed consent form · Oct 28, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Only de-identified data will be shared with co-collaborators at Northwestern University (PI: Carol E. Bretschneider) and University of Louisville (PI: Ankita Gupta)

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06170450
Lead sponsor
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Collaborators
Northwestern University, University of Louisville, Metro Health, Michigan
Responsible party
David Sheyn (Physician, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 14, 2023
Start date
Apr 15, 2024
Primary completion
May 12, 2026
Completion
May 12, 2026
Results posted
Jul 24, 2026
Last update
Jul 24, 2026

Study contacts

David Sheyn, MD
principal investigator · UH Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion