CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06170229CANOUpdated Jun 16, 2026

Aerobic vs Neuromuscular Exercise for Knee OA

An interventional study of eHIIT and NEMEX-e in Knee Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Frederiksberg University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-16.

Sponsored by Frederiksberg University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to compare the effects of an education and High Intensity Interval Training program (eHIIT) with the widely used Neuromuscular Exercise and education program (NEMEX-e) on knee OA symptoms and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in people with knee OA and at least one risk factor for developement of cardiovascular disease. The main research questions the study aims to answer are:

  • Is the eHIIT program better than the NEMEX-e program for reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease?
  • Are the two programs equally good at providing improvement in knee symptoms?
02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,302 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 608 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 70 across 2,731 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

Frederiksberg University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18- years
  • Diagnosis of tibiofemoral knee OA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria
  • Radiographically confirmed diagnosis of tibiofemoral OA based on radiographs not older than 6 months.
  • Average knee pain level ≥ 4 (0=No pain and 10=Worst pain) over the past week (7 days)
  • At least one of following risk factors for development of cardiovascular disease:

    • Body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2
    • Hypertension (or in treatment of): Systolic ≥ 135 and/or diastolic ≥ 85 mm Hg
    • Elevated HbA1c (or in treatment of): ≥ 130.7 mg/dL (44 mmol/mol)
    • Elevated Triglycerides (or in treatment of): ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L)
    • Elevated Cholesterol (or in treatment of) (Low density lipides, LDL): LDL ≥ 54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to exercise (e.g., resting systolic blood pressure > 200 or diastolic blood pressure > 115, acute or reoccurring chest pain)
  • Unstable body weight the last 3 months (gain/loss outside +/- 5 kg)
  • Planned weight loss (non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical) during study participation
  • Known current cancer
  • Major cardiovascular event within the last 5 years
  • Insulin dependent type 1 or type 2 diabetes
  • Psoriatic, rheumatoid, or gouty arthritis disease
  • Generalized pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia
  • Lumbar or cervical nerve root compression syndromes
  • Scheduled surgery during study participation
  • Treatment with biological medication
  • Impairments that prevent performance in high intensity aerobic exercise
  • Current or planned participation in other health research intervention studies
  • Pregnant/considering pregnancy
  • Any other condition or impairment that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes a potential participant unsuitable for participation or which obstruct participation, such as a large knee joint effusion, uncontrolled diabetes/hypertension, psychiatric or cognitive disorders, language barriers, or opiate dependency.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Education and High Intensity Interval Training (eHIIT)

    1 educational session lasting 1 hour. 12 weeks of supervised High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) 3 times/week.

    Behavioral: eHIIT

  • Active comparator
    Neuromuscular exercise and education program (NEMEX-e)

    2 educational sessions lasting 1 hour each. 8 weeks of supervised Neuromuscular Exercise 2 times/week.

    Behavioral: NEMEX-e

Interventions

  • BehavioraleHIIT

    Education and High intensity Interval Training (Aerobic Exercise) The focus of the one educational session is rationale for aerobic exercise, expected physiological effects of aerobic exercise, diet when performing an exercise program, how the knee accommodates to exercise (including potential experience of muscle soreness and how that is different from joint pain), and management of potential knee OA symptom flares. HIIT is an aerobic exercise form. The eHITT protocol consist of eight 2-minute intervals of high intensity training (with the goal to train at a heart rate of at least 80% of HRmax) followed by 2 minutes of moderate training intensity (with the goal to train at a heart rate of at least 60% of HRmax). There will be several types of exercise modalities for aerobic exercise available (treadmills, cross-trainers, row- and cycle ergometers) and participants may choose whichever they prefer.

  • BehavioralNEMEX-e

    Education and Neuromuscular Exercise The focus of the two educational sessions is on providing knowledge of OA and treatment options to the participants, with a special focus on knee OA, diet, and exercise and its benefits. Furthermore, advice about self-management is given. The exercises are based on neuromuscular principles to improve sensorimotor control and achieve compensatory functional stability. Sensorimotor control is the ability to coordinate muscle activity and maintain functional stability during movement allowing for joint stability during physical activity. Various positions (sitting, lying, standing) are used to achieve the desired postural activity. The overall goal is to obtain muscle control and stability in situations resembling daily life and/or more strenuous activities. The focus is on achieving good quality of the performance in each exercise with appropriate postural orientation (e.g., joint positioned appropriately in relation to each other).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max)

    Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on an ergometer bicycle for evaluation maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) measured in ml/min/kg

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Knee pain

    The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscale (KOOS-pain), a disease-specific patient-reported instrument designed to assess knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The KOOS-pain subscale is scored on a 0-100 scale with 100 indicating no pain and 0 indicating extreme pain.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max)

    Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on an ergometer bicycle for evaluation maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) measured in ml/min/kg

    Time frame: Week 8 and week 26

  2. Knee pain

    The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscale (KOOS-pain), a disease-specific patient-reported instrument designed to assess knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The KOOS-pain subscale is scored on a 0-100 scale with 100 indicating no pain and 0 indicating extreme pain.

    Time frame: Week 8 and week 26

  3. Body Mass

    Body mass measured in kilograms using a scale

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  4. Blood Pressure

    Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  5. Triglyceride concentration

    From a blood sample

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  6. Low Density Lipids (LDL) concentration

    From a blood sample

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  7. Cholesterol concentration

    From a blood sample

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  8. Glucose concentration

    From a blood sample

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  9. HbA1c concentration

    From a blood sample

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  10. Patient Global Assessment of disease Impact

    Patient-reported degree of patient's perceived impact of their knee OA on their overall life will be obtained using a 100 mm analogue scale (VAS) with anchors: 0=" No impact" and 100 = "Worst imaginable impact".

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  11. Physical Functioning

    The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) function subscale (KOOS-function), a disease-specific patient-reported instrument designed to assess physical functioning in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The KOOS-function subscale is scored on a 0-100 scale with 100 indicating no functional impairments and 0 indicating extreme functional impairments.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  12. Health related quality of Life and physical and mental well-being (Short Form 12 (SF-12))

    The 12-item short form health questionnaire (SF-12) is a measure of physical and mental health. The physical health component is scored between 0-72. The mental health component is scored between 0-70. For both components 0 mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

Other outcomes

  1. Knee-related Quality of Life

    The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) quality of life subscale (KOOS-QoL), a disease-specific patient-reported instrument designed to assess knee-related quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The KOOS-QoL subscale is scored on a 0-100 scale with 100 indicating best possible knee-related quality of life and 0 indicating worst possible knee-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  2. Knee Symptoms

    The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) symptoms subscale (KOOS-symptoms), a disease-specific patient-reported instrument designed to knee symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis. KOOS-symptom is scored on a 0-100 scale with indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating worst possible symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  3. Knee Function in Sports and Recreational activities

    The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sports and Recreation subscale (KOOS-Sports/Recreation), a disease-specific patient-reported instrument designed to knee symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis. KOOS-Sports/Recreation is scored on a 0-100 scale with indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating worst possible symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  4. The World Health Organisation - Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)

    Patient reported mental well-being will be obtained with the The World Health Organisation 5-Well-Being Index consisting of five questions each scored on a 0 to 5 scale. Raw score: 0 represents worst possible well-being and 25 represents best possible well-being. Percentage score: 0 represents worst possible well-being and 100 represents best possible well-being.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  5. OMERACT-OARSI treatment responder criteria

    A classification of patients as a positive responder based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) (OMERACT-OARSI) responder criteria that classifies patients according to improvements in pain (co-primary outcome),function (secondary outcome) and patient global assessment (secondary outcome). Each participant is classified as either a "responder" or a "non-responder" at each of the post-baseline follow-ups.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  6. Sleep quality using the global Single-item sleep quality scale (SQS)

    Sleep quality will be obtained with the global Single-item sleep quality scale (SQS). SQS is scored on 0-10 scale with 0 representing worst possible sleep quality and 10 representing best possible sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  7. Nightly pain

    Self-reported pain during the night is obtained on a 0-2 scale with 0=No nightly pain, 1=pain at movement or in certain positions, and 2=Pain even without movement.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  8. Maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 peak) during a cardiopulmonary exercise test

    A cardiopulmonary exercise test will be used to assess maximal aerobic capacity (VO2peak) measured in ml/min/kg.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  9. Maximum work during a cardiopulmonary exercise test

    The maximal work during the cardiopulmonary exercise test measured in Watts (W)

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  10. Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) during a cardiopulmonary exercise test

    The respiratory exchange ratio (RER) during the cardiopulmonary exercise test is calculated as the ratio of carbon-dioxide production (VCO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2)

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  11. Maximal hear rate during a cardiopulmonary exercise test

    The maximal heart rate during a cardiopulmonary exercise test is recorded as beats/min.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8, week 12 and week 26

  12. Lean body mass from a dual x-ray absorptiometry scan

    Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) will be used to assess lean body mass

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  13. Total fat mass from a dual x-ray absorptiometry scan

    Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) will be used to assess total fat mass.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  14. Bone mineral density from a dual x-ray absorptiometry scan

    Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) will be used to assess bone density.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  15. Hip and waist circumstance

    The measurements are recorded in cm and measured during a clinical examination using a measurement tape and standardized procedures

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  16. Leg extensor power

    Muscle power (force × velocity) of the lower limb of the target knee will be assessed using the Nottingham power rig. In a seated position, the participants will be instructed to push with a single leg against a plate at maximal effort/force.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  17. Analgesics usage

    The participants' use of over-the-counter paracetamol and ibuprofen will be recorded during an interview with an investigator.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  18. Pressure pain sensitivity

    A hand-held pressure algometer will used to assess pressure pain thresholds (PPTs). Pressure will be applied at a rate of approximately 30 kilopascal per second (kPa/s), with a 1 cm2 probe. All participants are instructed to push a button when they feel that the pressure becomes just barely painful. PPTs from the medial tibiofemoral joint space on the target knee and the contralateral elbow will be assessed

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  19. C-reactive protein concentration

    From a blood sample

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  20. Interleukin 6 (IL6) concentration

    From a blood sample

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

  21. Seismocardiography - estimate of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) during rest.

    Seismocardiography (SCG) is a technique for non-invasive evaluation of cardiac activity through the measurement of precordial vibrations using an accelerometer. SCG is performed by mounting a 3-axis accelerometer on the skin covering the sternum with double adhesive tape. The measurement is performed with the participant lying in the supine position after 5 minutes of rest. The 3-dimensional accelerations are recorded and used together with age, sex, body weight and height in an algorithm to estimate cardiorespiratory function (VO2max) at rest. NOTE: This outcome is added to the protocol after recruitment was started and will therefore only be measured on a subset of participants (participants enrolled after August 15, 2024).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 26

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg Hospital
    Copenhagen, 2000, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06170229
Lead sponsor
Frederiksberg University Hospital
Responsible party
Marius Henriksen (Professor, Frederiksberg University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 14, 2023
Start date
Feb 23, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 16, 2026
Completion
Jun 12, 2026
Last update
Jun 16, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion