CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06166576RESOLVEUpdated Aug 20, 2026

Radioembolization as a Spearhead Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Localized Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ablative radioembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Recruiting at 5 sites in South Korea. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The RESOLVE trial, an open-label, single-arm, multi-center study, aims to assess the efficacy and safety of ablative radioembolization using TheraSphere Yttrium-90 microspheres. This trial specifically targets patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma accompanied by localized portal vein tumor thrombosis (Vp1-Vp3) and who maintain good liver function.

Read the detailed description

Patients diagnosed with unilobar hepatocellular carcinoma and localized portal vein tumor thrombosis (Vp1-Vp3), who also exhibit good liver function, will undergo ablative radioembolization with a dose exceeding 205 Gy to the tumor using TheraSphere glass microspheres. These patients will be monitored over a two-year period to evaluate their clinical course, treatment outcomes, and safety.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Radioembolization
  • Portal vein tumor thrombosis
03

In context

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

3,182 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; 954 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 55 across 2,298 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.

Browse Carcinoma, Hepatocellular studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,860 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults aged 18 and over
  2. Patients diagnosed with unilobar hepatocellular carcinoma, either histologically and/or radiologically (LI-RADS 4 or 5)
  3. Patients with at least one measurable lesion greater than 10 mm on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI
  4. Patients with localized portal vein invasion limited in one lobe (Vp1-3) on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI
  5. Patients with no extrahepatic metastasis on lung CT and contrast-enhanced abdominal CT or MRI
  6. Patients with no prior treatment for liver cancer
  7. Child-Pugh class A
  8. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or less
  9. Patients without serious dysfunction of major organs, as indicated by blood tests conducted within one month of study enrollment

    1. Leukocytes ≥ 2,500/µL and ≤ 12,000/µL
    2. Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3
    3. Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL (transfusions allowed to meet this criterion)
    4. Total bilirubin ≤ 3.0 mg/dL
    5. Platelets ≥ 50,000/µL
    6. For patients not on anticoagulants, INR ≤ 2.0
    7. AST ≤ 200 IU/L (i.e., ≤ 5X upper normal limit)
    8. ALT ≤ 200 IU/L (i.e., ≤ 5X upper normal limit)
    9. ALP ≤ 575 IU/L (i.e., ≤ 5X upper normal limit)
    10. Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
  10. Patients with a life expectancy of more than 3 months
  11. Patients who have fully understood the clinical trial and given written consent
  12. Female patients of childbearing age confirmed not to be pregnant

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients unsuitable for ablative radioembolization as per the pre-test with macro-aggregated albumin labeled with technetium-99 (99mTc-MAA) for radioembolization.

    1. Cases where, according to multi-compartment Medical Internal Radiation Dose method, delivering 205 Gy of radiation to the tumor exceeds an estimated lung dose of 25 Gy.
    2. Cases with severe hepatic artery-portal vein shunting leading to expected irradiation of the non-tumorous opposite lobe.
  2. Patients whose volume of non-tumorous liver not included in the treatment area is less than 30% of the total non-tumorous liver volume.
  3. Patients with hepatic vein or bile duct invasion as seen on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI.
  4. Patients scheduled to use immunotherapy regardless of the response to radioembolization.
  5. Patients who had active cancer within two years prior to joining the clinical trial.
  6. Patients who have undergone surgery or procedures related to the bile duct.
  7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radioembolization

    Hepatocellular carcinoma with localized portal vein tumor thrombosis (Vp1-Vp3) will be treated by ablative radioembolization using TheraSphere (Boston Scientific) glass microspheres

    Procedure: Ablative radioembolization

Interventions

  • ProcedureAblative radioembolization

    The interventional radiologist utilizes a pre-test with 99mTc-MAA SPECT-CT and cone-beam CT for procedural planning. For tumors confined to a single segment, the treatment area is planned to receive a radiation dose of over 400 Gy using the single-compartment MIRD technique. For tumors extending beyond a single segment, the multi-compartment MIRD technique is used to plan a radiation dose of 700 Gy (± 20%) to the tumor. The upper limit for the estimated lung dose is set at 25 Gy, and the upper limit for the perfused non-tumoral liver dose is 250 Gy. In cases where tumors extending beyond a single segment cannot receive the planned dose of 700 Gy (± 20%) due to limits on lung or normal liver dose, the plan is adjusted to deliver the maximum dose to the tumor within the permissible range for lung and normal liver doses. Radioembolization is typically performed in a single session, and any methods not mentioned here should follow the instructions for use of TheraSphere.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective response rate according to mRECIST

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  2. Duration of response according to mRECIST

    Time frame: Time of response up to progression, subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  3. 2-year restricted mean duration of response according to localized mRECIST and mRECIST

    Time frame: Time of response up to progression, subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or 24 months after the initial treatment

  4. Complete response rate according to localized mRECIST and mRECIST

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  5. Duration of complete response according to localized mRECIST and mRECIST

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  6. 2-year restricted mean DoCR (RMDoCR) according to localized mRECIST and mRECIST

    Time frame: Time of complete response up to progression, subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or 24 months after the initial treatment

  7. Best response within 2-years according to localized mRECIST and mRECIST

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  8. Time to best response according to localized mRECIST and mRECIST

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  9. Time to progression according to localized mRECIST and mRECIST

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  10. 2-year restricted mean survival time of overall survival

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or 24 months the initial treatment

  11. Progression-free survival

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  12. Hepatic progression-free survival

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  13. Pathological necrosis rate (%) after curative resection or liver transplantation

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  14. Time to subsequent HCC treatment

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  15. Reason for subsequent HCC treatment

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  16. Rate for conversion to curative resection and liver transplantation

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  17. Adverse event and serious adverse event

    Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to 90 days after the initial treatment or subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first

  18. Changes in Child-Pugh class

    Time frame: Baseline up to 90 days after the initial treatment or subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first

  19. Changes in ALBI (albumin-bilirubin) grade

    Time frame: Baseline up to 90 days after the initial treatment or subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first

  20. Changes in MELD (Model for end-stage liver disease) score

    Time frame: Baseline up to 90 days after the initial treatment or subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first

  21. Changes in ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status scale

    0 (fully active) to 5 (dead)

    Time frame: Baseline up to 90 days after the initial treatment or subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first

  22. Objective response rate according to localized mRECIST

    The number of patients with partial or complete response as the best local response divided by the total number of participants

    Time frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

  23. Duration of response according to localized mRECIST

    The time from first documentation of partial or complete response to the first documentation of progressive disease, death due to any cause, or receipt of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first

    Time frame: Time of response up to progression, subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

Other outcomes

  1. Pre-treatment dosimetry based on 99mTc-MAA SPECT-CT

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Post-treatment dosimetry based on Y90 PET-CT

    Time frame: Within two days after the procedure

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • National Cancer Center
    Ilsan, Gyeonggi-do 10408, South Korea
    • In Joon Lee, MD, PhD · Contact · 2injoon@hanmail.net · +82 319200114
    • In Joon Lee, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13620, South Korea
    • Gun Young Kim · Contact · kky2kkw@gmail.com · +82 317877619
    • Gun Young Kim, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, Seoul 03080, South Korea
    • Jin Woo Choi, MD, PhD · Contact · jwchoi.med@snu.ac.kr · +82-220722584
    • Jin Woo Choi, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Severance Hospital
    Seoul, 03722, South Korea
    • Gyoung Min Kim · Contact · kimgm@yonsei.ac.kr
    • Gyoung Min Kim, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Samsung Medical Center
    Seoul, 06351, South Korea
    • Dong-Ho Hyun, MD, PhD · Contact · mesentery@naver.com
    • Dong-Ho Hyun, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Choi JW, Kim GM, Hyun D, Jang MJ, Kim HC. Radioembolization as a Spearhead Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Localized Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis (RESOLVE): Protocol for an Open-label, Multi-center, Single-arm Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Mar;48(3):398-404. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03935-2. Epub 2025 Feb 13. PubMed 39948248 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06166576
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Responsible party
Jin Woo Choi (Associate Professor, Seoul National University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2023
Start date
Nov 20, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Study contacts

Jin Woo Choi, MD, PhD
Contact
jwchoi.med@snu.ac.kr
+82-220722584
Jin Woo Choi, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Seoul National University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion